On Sun, Jul 9, 2023, 23:35 Christopher Barker wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 8:37 AM James Addison via Python-ideas <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> ISTM the primary use cases advanced here have been for "naive" users.
>>>> Likely they won'
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, 01:19 Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 15/07/2023 21:08, Dom Grigonis wrote:
>
> Just to add. I haven’t thought about evaluation. Thus, to prevent
> evaluation of unnecessary code, introduction of C-style expression is
> needed anyways:
>
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023, 16:25 Paul Moore wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 15:56, Stephen J. Turnbull <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> James Addison via Python-ideas writes:
>>
>> > The implementation of such a system could either be c
packaging infrastructure.
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023, 16:09 James Addison wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 9, 2023, 15:52 Stephen J. Turnbull <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> James Addison via Python-ideas writes:
>>
>> > The implementation of such a system co
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023, 15:52 Stephen J. Turnbull <
[email protected]> wrote:
> James Addison via Python-ideas writes:
>
> > The implementation of such a system could either be centralized or
> > distributed; the trust signals that human users infer from
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023, 09:13 Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 18:06, James Addison via Python-ideas
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 02:11, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > > I have always thought that any community scoring system should allow
> > &g
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 02:11, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> On 04Jul2023 17:21, Christopher Barker wrote:
> >3) A rating system built into PyPi -- This could be a combination of
> >two
> >things:
> > A - Automated analysis -- download stats, dependency stats, release
> >frequency, etc, etc, etc.
> >
hird party module on a UEFI
>> interface.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:11 AM James Addison via Python-ideas <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 19:06 Chris Angelico wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 6 Jul 2023
ty use cases.
>
> I don’t want to load a hash table to load a third party module on a UEFI
> interface.
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:11 AM James Addison via Python-ideas <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 19:06 Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 19:06 Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 03:57, James Addison via Python-ideas
> wrote:
> > I also agree with a later reply about avoiding the murkier side of
> blockchains / etc. That said, it seems to me (again, sample size one
> anecdata) th
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 01:24 Christopher Barker wrote:
> Stating a new thread with a correct title.
>
> On 2 Jul 2023, at 10:12, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, too much of this discussion is framed as “someone should”,
>> or “it would be good if”. No-one is saying “I will”. Naming groups, li
Hi Richard,
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 12:49, Richard Hajek wrote:
>
> I encountered that Enum having a len hid a mistake on my part. If len(Enum)
> raised, my mistake would be immediately apparent, however at the end of the
> day, my mistake was easily found.
Can any Python linting tools (such as
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 02:06, Inada Naoki wrote:
>
> `-X importtime=2`
>
> This is expert-only tool. So no need for verbose name.
+1 that re-using existing parameter names is both concise and also convenient.
However: do we have an opportunity to make the parameter _value_ both
concise and also
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 11:29, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Trying to squeeze many lines of code into one line is a bad idea.
Agreed, in most cases - but there can be (no pun intended.. probably)
exceptions to that.
if cloudy or raining:
print("Bring an umbrella")
else:
print("Looks fair out"
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 20:20, dn wrote:
>
> (and hence earlier illustration/question: does the sep belong with the
> string forming the left-side of that partition, or the 'right'?)
There's no connection implied between each separator and the
partitions that surround it in the results.
In the use
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 08:32, Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
>
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 10:48:48AM -0800, Peter Ludemann wrote:
> > > You can get almost the same result using pattern matching. For example,
> your
> > > "foo:bar;baz".partition(":", ";")
> > > can be d
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 13:20, Barry Scott wrote:
> Maybe combine the ideas by allowing a tuple where a string is used.
> 'a=b;c'.partition('=', (':',';')) => ('a', '=', b, ';', 'c')
I like that idea - and it seems to fit neatly with the existing
partition contract: the inclusion of the matched-de
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 03:44, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> Keep it nice and simple: provided with multiple separators, `partition`
> will split the string on the first separator found in the source string.
>
> In other words, `source.partition(a, b, c, d)` will split on a /or/ b
> /or/ c /or/ d, whic
Hi folks,
I'd like to gather some feedback on a feature suggestion to extend
str.partition and bytes.partition to support multiple arguments. Please find
the feature described below.
# Feature or enhancement
The str.partition[1] method -- and similarly the bytes.partition[2] method --
is useful w
19 matches
Mail list logo
