On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 11:20 PM Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> It's getting the fiddly stuff right (numerical stability and accuracy,
> catching edge cases in algorithms) so that you can use it with
> confidence for work that has consequences if you get it wro
Greg Ewing writes:
> On 16/08/20 4:26 am, Ricky Teachey wrote:
> > There are certainly
> > instances where I've needed to used matrices to solve a system of
> > equations in an automated way. But most of time it's simply not needed,
>
> If we're going to have a class that supports matrix
Christopher Barker writes:
> Anyway, I would like to see a nice linear algebra lib -- but not 'cause I'd
> use it, only because I find it interesting.
SymPy.
Except that in this conversation, "linear algebra" is likely neither
restricted to linearity nor so much algebraic as computational, so
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 10:50 AM David Mertz wrote:
> What is happening in the discussion is that each potential user who
> comments finds some related capability that is relevant to their particular
> needs. But the union of all those wishes is something substantially
> large... Maybe not NumPy
On 17/08/20 8:19 am, Sebastian Berg wrote:
[1] The difference is that `arr[()]` extracts a scalar, while
`arr[...]` returns the array (container) unchanged. This difference
only matters for zero dimensional arrays. There may be reasons to
prefer one over the other, but I can't think of any righ
*unconcerned
(sorry for the spam)
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 3:57 PM Caleb Donovick
wrote:
> > Fine, so the use case you claimed was fiction. If you had just said
> "DSL" instead of "anonymous protocols and dataclasses" you would have
> gotten straight to the point and we would have been talking a
> Fine, so the use case you claimed was fiction. If you had just said "DSL"
instead of "anonymous protocols and dataclasses" you would have gotten
straight to the point and we would have been talking about whether extended
subscription would be useful for DSLs (I can see various use cases), rather
On Sun, 2020-08-16 at 12:07 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 5:45 AM Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:32:08AM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> > > On 16/08/20 11:49 am, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > > >SEMANTICS OF NO ARGUMENTS
> > > >I can see two
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 1:19 AM Christopher Barker
wrote:
Well, I was trained and an engineer, but now call myself an oceanographer,
but in any case, I don't need to submit my calculations for review to
anyone. Though I do need to present algorithms / calculations / methods in
written form that
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 5:45 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:32:08AM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> > On 16/08/20 11:49 am, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > >SEMANTICS OF NO ARGUMENTS
> > >I can see two basic ways of allowing no arguments. One is for the
> > >interpreter
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 10:00 PM Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 08:26:10PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > Are you saying that for xarray it is important to distinguish between
> > `d[day=3, detector=4]` and `d[detector=4, day=3]`? If we just passed the
> > keyword args to
The more this discussion goes on, the more convinced I am of my initial
opinion. A matrix library doesn't belong in the standard library.
What is happening in the discussion is that each potential user who
comments finds some related capability that is relevant to their particular
needs. But the u
+1 for the idea of a module for matrices and vectors in the stdlib.
One aspect that I would like to highlight is that NumPy is not always so easily
available. I got feedback from many schools that they were using tablet
computers or something like Chrome books and thus basically limited to anyt
Ram,
If you install pandas from source,
(https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas#installation-from-sources) then there is
a reasonable chance that you will be able to tie the error messages to the
source code.
If you are finding that the error messages are not clear then I would encourage
you to
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:32:08AM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> On 16/08/20 11:49 am, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >SEMANTICS OF NO ARGUMENTS
> >I can see two basic ways of allowing no arguments. One is for the
> >interpreter to construct an object that is the argument passed to
> >__get
Ram Rachum schrieb am 15.08.20 um 21:08:
> Here's something that's been bugging me for years. I'll suggest something,
> but since I'm a total newbie about this area, it's possible that everything
> I'm saying is impossible or doesn't make sense.
>
> I'm working with some Pandas code now, and there
On 16/08/20 11:49 am, Guido van Rossum wrote:
SEMANTICS OF NO ARGUMENTS
I can see two basic ways of allowing no arguments. One is for the
interpreter to construct an object that is the argument passed to
__getitem__ and so forth. The other is to not pass an argument at
all. I
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 10:03 PM Marco Sulla
wrote:
>
> ...up?
>
What do you mean?
ChrisA
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/pyth
...up?
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 04:41, Marco Sulla wrote:
> Think if you're able to do:
>
>
> from aenum import const
> @const a = 5
>
>
> Notice that I'm using the "at" char because I can't find a better character.
>
> I give the rest to your imagination:
>
>
> # previous declarations of x in the s
Thanks for the responses everyone.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 9:43 AM Marco Sulla
wrote:
> You probably wants also the python extension for gdb, to go faster to
> the interesting code:
> https://stackoverflow.com/q/41160447/1763602
> ___
> Python-ideas ma
20 matches
Mail list logo
