Hi,
I saw many changes related to pyc last week, so I had a look. I don't
understand well these issues. Here are my notes to try to understand the
context ;-) I don't request any change, I'm fine with the latest choices
made in Fedora.
--
There are different issues:
(1) Performance regre
Hi,
It sounds like an issue in SWIG which access directly the
PyInterpreterState structure which became opaque in Python 3.8.
SWIG should use PyImport_GetModuleDict() public function instead, to
access PyImport_GetModuleDict(). In short, it returns interp->modules.
Victor
Le mar. 24 sept. 2019
Hi,
I'm not used to poetry yet. Is it a flaw in poetry to skip
documentation and tests by default? On my personal projects, I'm
trying to ensure that the sdist contains all files of the Git
repository using MANIFEST.in.
I agree with Miro that it's better to collaborate with upstream to
ensure tha
> Solution 4: ZIP the entire standard library
> (...)
> Nevertheless, this might (in theory) **save 17.8 MiB / 47 %**.
It's my favorite option. Almost 50% smaller is quite good! It would be
very efficient to have such disk space gain!
Using a ZIP file for the stdlib is commonly suggested solution
Hi,
There are currently 4 issues which prevent to build the Python package
on Fedora Rawhide: Python 3.8.1 and Python 3.9.0a3 packages are
impacted, at least.
My Python 3.9.0a3 PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python39/pull-request/16
Example of Python 3.8.1 PR with failing tests:
https://
That's great, thanks!
Victor
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 1:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hey Pythonistas,
>
> I've just retired Python 2.6 and Python 3.4 from rawhide (Fedora 33+).
>
> - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetirePython26
> - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetirePython3
I replied on the issue.
Victor
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 3:11 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> I've attempted to update python-pyface to 7.1.0 in Rawhide, however a
> test is segfaulting. I've reported upstream here:
>
> https://github.com/enthought/pyface/issues/784
>
> but perhaps someone with kno
Hi José,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:17 PM José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Probably the build was erased, another place where it can be found is:
> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nonamedotc/nbconvert-6.0.7/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01795144-python-nbconvert/
I cannot find "xelatex" nor "OSE
Oh, GCC 11 already landed on the Fedora Python buildbots running
Rawhide. I created an issue to track the bugs on Python upstream:
test_buffer fails on Python built with GCC 11
https://bugs.python.org/issue42587
Victor
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:26 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I've been
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 4:08 PM Victor Stinner wrote:
> Oh, GCC 11 already landed on the Fedora Python buildbots running
> Rawhide. I created an issue to track the bugs on Python upstream:
>
> test_buffer fails on Python built with GCC 11
> https://bugs.python.org/issue42587
I bi
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 4:20 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> I would expect it'll be in Jakub's next Fedora GCC build. He's on PTO
> right now, but I wouldn't be surprised if he spins up a build between
> now and Christmas to pick up this (and other) fixes.
Ok, fine, IMO it can wait for a few days, it does
Wow, impressive list of enhancements, that's really great! I didn't
realized that so many things were done only in 2020!
Fedora is and remains my favorite OS to develop on Python!
Victor
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Inspired by a similar report from the Copr team, I’v
Congratulations, this change impacted tons of packages! That's also a
nice step towards more explicit build dependencies. I understood that
it's also the purpose of the pyproject.toml file ;-)
Victor
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 2:39 PM Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> we successfully pus
Congrats, that's amazing! :-) Let's fix remaining broken packages!
Victor
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 9:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 08. 06. 21 1:01, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 02. 06. 21 10:02, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> >> Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.10, we are running a coordinated
> >>
How can someone reproduce the issue? I was asked by a developer
running Ubuntu. Is there an easy way to:
(*) Get Fedora 36
(*) Build PyPy 2.7 for 32-bit: can it be done on x86-64? What is the
command line for that?
Victor
___
python-devel mailing list -
Thanks, I reported the issue to PyPy:
https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy/-/issues/3702
Victor
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 1:26 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 07. 03. 22 10:51, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > How can someone reproduce the issue? I was asked by a developer
> > running U
That's great! It makes Python 3.11 usable in more cases.
Victor
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:19 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 16. 03. 22 17:12, Tomáš Orsava wrote:
> > Hi Python-devel,
> > we are considering splitting the alternative Python versions from a
> > single-package format (e.g. python3.11)
Hi,
Some background on pathfix.py. On Fedora, pathfix.py is available as
/usr/bin/pathfix.py but also /usr/bin/pathfixX.Y.py where X.Y is the
Python version (ex: pathfix3.10.py). So it's an executable program
(implemented in Python).
Yep, I just removed pathfix.py from Python 3.12, as part of the
Which kind of computers and hardware use 32-bit ARM these days?
Raspberry Pi Zero 2 (2021), Raspberry Pi 3 (2018), Raspberry Pi 4
(2019) use 64-bit ARM, whereas older Raspberry Pi 1 (2012), Raspberry
Pi 2 (2015) and Raspberry Pi Zero (2015) use 32-bit ARM.
Victor
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:08 AM
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:34 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The Python standard library distutils module will be removed from Python 3.12+
> https://peps.python.org/pep-0632/
It's done:
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/0faa0ba240e815614e5a2900e48007acac41b214
I created a discussion to co
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 8:23 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Python 3.13 has an experimental JIT compiler:
> https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.13.html#experimental-jit-compiler
>
> Enabling it is a configure (hence build-time) option.
>
> How do we handle this in Fedora?
>
> - We can keep it disable
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 2:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Victor, do you think it would be possible to build in the JIT support but have
> a runtime opt-out/opt-in switch? That way, we can build it, but disable it by
> default, unless our users want to experiment with it.
PEP 744 "JIT Compilation" in
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 9:47 AM Karolina Surma via python-devel
wrote:
> ## How to run things locally?
>
> You can use mock. Make sure to:
> 1. Clear all caches first: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64--scrub=all
> 2. Use the Koji repo: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64
> --enablerepo=loca
23 matches
Mail list logo
