Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org

2016-02-08 Thread Zachary Ware
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote: > Zachary, > > Do you run the benchmarks in rigorous mode? Not currently. I think I need to reschedule when the benchmarks are run anyway, to avoid conflicts with PyPy's usage of that box, and will add rigorous mode when I do that. -- Zach

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org

2016-02-08 Thread Yury Selivanov
Zachary, Do you run the benchmarks in rigorous mode? Yury On 2016-02-04 1:48 AM, Zachary Ware wrote: I'm happy to announce that speed.python.org is finally functional! There's not much there yet, as each benchmark builder has only sent one result so far (and one of those involved a bit of chea

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org

2016-02-05 Thread Brett Cannon
To piggyback on Zach's speed.python.org announcement, we will most likely be kicking off a discussion of redoing the benchmark suite, tweaking the test runner, etc. over on the speed@ ML. Those of us who have been doing perf work lately have found some shortcoming we would like to fix in our benchm

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org

2016-02-05 Thread Yury Selivanov
Big thanks to you, Zachary (and everyone involved)! It's a very good news. Yury On 2016-02-04 1:48 AM, Zachary Ware wrote: I'm happy to announce that speed.python.org is finally functional! There's not much there yet, as each benchmark builder has only sent one result so far (and one of those

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org

2016-02-04 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 4 February 2016 at 16:48, Zachary Ware wrote: > I'm happy to announce that speed.python.org is finally functional! > There's not much there yet, as each benchmark builder has only sent > one result so far (and one of those involved a bit of cheating on my > part), but it's there. > > There are

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org

2016-02-04 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 4 February 2016 at 16:48, Zachary Ware wrote: > I'm happy to announce that speed.python.org is finally functional! > There's not much there yet, as each benchmark builder has only sent > one result so far (and one of those involved a bit of cheating on my > part), but it's there. > > There are

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org

2016-02-04 Thread Victor Stinner
Great! 2016-02-04 7:48 GMT+01:00 Zachary Ware : > I'm happy to announce that speed.python.org is finally functional! > There's not much there yet, as each benchmark builder has only sent > one result so far (and one of those involved a bit of cheating on my > part), but it's there. > > There are l

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org (was: 2.7 is here until 2020, please don't call it a waste.)

2015-06-24 Thread Philip Jenvey
> On Jun 22, 2015, at 6:58 PM, Zachary Ware > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:32 PM, R. David Murray >> wrote: >>> OK, so what you are saying is that speed.python.org will run a buildbot >>> slave so that when a change is commi

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org

2015-06-23 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 23.06.2015 03:58, Zachary Ware wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:32 PM, R. David Murray >> wrote: >>> OK, so what you are saying is that speed.python.org will run a buildbot >>> slave so that when a change is committed to cPython,

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org (was: 2.7 is here until 2020, please don't call it a waste.)

2015-06-22 Thread Zachary Ware
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:32 PM, R. David Murray wrote: >> OK, so what you are saying is that speed.python.org will run a buildbot >> slave so that when a change is committed to cPython, a speed run will be >> triggered? Is "the runner"

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org (was: 2.7 is here until 2020, please don't call it a waste.)

2015-06-04 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:32 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:55:55 +0200, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: >> On 04.06.2015 04:08, Tetsuya Morimoto wrote: >> >> If someone were to volunteer to set up and run speed.python.org, I think >> > we could add some additional focus on performance

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org (was: 2.7 is here until 2020, please don't call it a waste.)

2015-06-04 Thread R. David Murray
On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:55:55 +0200, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > On 04.06.2015 04:08, Tetsuya Morimoto wrote: > >> If someone were to volunteer to set up and run speed.python.org, I think > > we could add some additional focus on performance regressions. Right now, > > we don't have any way of reliabl

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org (was: 2.7 is here until 2020, please don't call it a waste.)

2015-06-04 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 04.06.2015 04:08, Tetsuya Morimoto wrote: >> If someone were to volunteer to set up and run speed.python.org, I think > we could add some additional focus on performance regressions. Right now, > we don't have any way of reliably and reproducibly testing Python > performance. > > I'm very inter

Re: [Python-Dev] speed.python.org machine online

2011-06-29 Thread Eric Snow
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jesse Noller wrote: > I've posted a more expansive entry on my blog: > http://jessenoller.com/2011/06/29/announcing-the-new-speed-python-org-machine/ > > But the short version, that as discussed at the VM and language > summit, we now have a hosted machine dedicat