[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Your posts are making it. It's just that everyone's ignoring you :)
>
> Christopher> I feel loved .
>
> Christopher> Seriously, why would somoene ignore this? this is
> Christopher> obviously not a pebkac problem.
>
> I'm not sure what a "pe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not sure what a "pebkac" problem is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PEBKAC
You'll learn some new nonsense every day ;-)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
>> Your posts are making it. It's just that everyone's ignoring you :)
Christopher> I feel loved .
Christopher> Seriously, why would somoene ignore this? this is
Christopher> obviously not a pebkac problem.
I'm not sure what a "pebkac" problem is. I will attempt to cha
> Your posts are making it. It's just that everyone's ignoring you :)
I feel loved .
Seriously, why would somoene ignore this? this is obviously not a
pebkac problem.
Respectfully,
Christopher Taylor
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@pyt
Christopher Taylor wrote:
> Ok, here's what I found: In addition to the configure script not
> taking changing LIBDIR, Modules/getpath.c uses a hardcoded value for
> static chat lib_python[] = "lib/python" VERSION;
> which appears on line 134. So even if the configure script changes
> LIBDIR it w
Christopher> I'm wondering if my posts are going through??
Yup. Sorry, but I've no useful comments to make on your problems though.
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscri
Ok, here's what I found: In addition to the configure script not
taking changing LIBDIR, Modules/getpath.c uses a hardcoded value for
static chat lib_python[] = "lib/python" VERSION;
which appears on line 134. So even if the configure script changes
LIBDIR it won't do much good because the value
