On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I don't think moralist arguments should have a weight when deciding
> which features we add. If developers want to introduce bugs or
> limitations in their software they will always be able to do it.
Actually when designing language feature
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:59:17 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> Exposing those flags would
> encourage people to do exactly that, and that would be a *really* bad
> idea
Making DNS resolution configurable (for example by allowing the user to
supply their own resolution function) in the stdlib's netwo
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> We are sorry but we cannot help you. This mailing list is to work on
>> developing Python (adding new features to Python itself and fixing bugs);
>
> Well, it seems
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 04:12:45PM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
> > We are sorry but we cannot help you. This mailing list is to work on
> > developing Python (adding new features to Python itself and fixing bugs);
>
> Well, it seems th
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
> Hello.
>
> We are sorry but we cannot help you. This mailing list is to work on
> developing Python (adding new features to Python itself and fixing bugs);
Well, it seems this post is about adding a new feature isn't it?
Cheers,
fijal
Hello all,
Can any of you core devs have a look at
http://bugs.python.org/issue10271. It seems Brett is really busy right
now and this uncontroversial (AFAICT) one liner only needs someone to
review it and commit it. The pb is, it's holding me back a little bit,
and I really would like to have it
