Maybe the problems in issue 23968 [1] could have been detected earlier
if the Gentoo "installed Python" buildbots setup by Zachary had been
on the stable list.
[1] http://bugs.python.org/issue23968
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots@pyth
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> Maybe the problems in issue 23968 [1] could have been detected earlier
> if the Gentoo "installed Python" buildbots setup by Zachary had been
> on the stable list.
I had planned a few months ago to completely rework the stable set,
but tha
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>> Maybe the problems in issue 23968 [1] could have been detected earlier
>> if the Gentoo "installed Python" buildbots setup by Zachary had been
>> on the stable list.
>
> I had planned
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware
> wrote:
>> I had planned a few months ago to completely rework the stable set,
>> but that hasn't actually happened yet. There was no disagreement with
>> adding more bots to the stable set whe
Great!
Thanks for including the PPC64 Linux and s390x Linux systems.
- David
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware
>> wrote:
>>> I had planned a few months ago to completely
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware
>> wrote:
>>> I had planned a few months ago to completely rework the stable set,
>>> but that hasn't actually happened yet. There was no
On 2 August 2016 at 03:28, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Cool! A glance at the current stables looks rather pretty... colourful
> at the moment, though.
The new tests for PEP 495's local time disambiguation flushed out some
underlying issues in the timezone database:
http://bugs.python.org/issue24773#m
