[Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-16 Thread David Edelsohn
What's the plan about updating the list of stable builders? The current stable builders don't appear very stable (not all green). There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the stable builders list. Thanks, David ___ Python-Buildbot

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-16 Thread R. David Murray
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:11:44 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: > What's the plan about updating the list of stable builders? > > The current stable builders don't appear very stable (not all green). At a quick glance it looks like those are bugs that need fixing, not stability errors. We should ping

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-16 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:35 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:11:44 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: >> There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the >> stable builders list. > > Do you have ones you'd like to nominate? > > It's probably time to put the docs

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-16 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:35 AM, R. David Murray wrote: >> There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the >> stable builders list. > > Do you have ones you'd like to nominate? AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green. Should that be declared stable?

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-16 Thread R. David Murray
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: > AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green. > Should that be declared stable? It's proving that the test suite can > run with full root privileges. Sound good to me. The ones mentioned in the other email I want

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-16 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:46 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: >> AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green. >> Should that be declared stable? It's proving that the test suite can >> run with full root privileges. > >

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-16 Thread Zachary Ware
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:11 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > What's the plan about updating the list of stable builders? > > The current stable builders don't appear very stable (not all green). > There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the > stable builders list. I had inten

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-16 Thread R. David Murray
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 16:11:54 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:46 PM, R. David Murray > wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: > >> AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green. > >> Should that be declared stable? It's

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-16 Thread Zachary Ware
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Zachary Ware wrote: > I had intended to audit all of the builders and come up with a new > stable set months ago, but it hasn't happened yet. I'll see whether I > can find some time to get anywhere on that this week. Here's the breakdown as I see it currently: "

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-16 Thread David Bolen
Just an FYI related to these: > "Iffy" (have failures that look related to the slave, but are > platforms that should be stable. If I reshuffle right now, they'll be > marked unstable): > bolen-ubuntu > bolen-windows > bolen-windows8 > bolen-windows10 I've watched them consistently failing for a