On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 23:20:41 -0700, Craig Rodrigues
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Berker PeksaÄ
> wrote:
> > Can't we refer people to https://devguide.python.org/buildslave/ and
> > update all outdated information there? It looks like the buildbot
> > pages on the wiki mostly contai
The question most relevant to this list is, what are the consequences on
the slave maintainers? Assuming we convert the master, will the slaves
be required to run python3/0.9? (That would certainly be desirable,
but would it be required?)
Are there advantages for the slave maintainers in the new
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 23:52:34 +, "Gregory P. Smith" wrote:
> I *believe* where and how the buildbots pull code from is controlled
> entirely by the buildbot master/server based on what I see my my own build
> slave's log. So switching is likely easy from that standpoint.
Correct, the slave po
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:16:46 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> The fingerprint needed to be updated in both PPC64 systems.
>
> I had better look at the Z systems as well.
Out of curiosity, what's the reason for using the hardcoded fingerprint
instead of just relying on the normal cert verify?
Also
Infra has updated the cert that serves hg.python.org. If you have
hardcoded the fingerprint in your slave's hg config you'll need
to update it to:
31:d8:79:0f:ca:b5:c4:76:85:ba:61:84:e7:5b:52:4f:78:7d:38:3e
At least one buildbot seems to be affected by this (PPC64LE Fedora).
--David
___
On Tue, 24 May 2016 09:39:48 -0500, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Palanikumar Gopalakrishnan
> wrote:
> > Hi ,
> > Iam completely new to bots and python, where i start my bot
> > creation
>
> Have a look here: https://wiki.python.org/moin/BuildBot
>
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:11:15 +0200, Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> On 23.11.15 18:00, R. David Murray wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:58:01 -0600, Zachary Ware
> > wrote:
> > I haven't looked at this, but unless the buildbot does *not* have write
> > access to th
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:58:01 -0600, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Inspired by a couple of issues about testing installed Python that
> popped up this morning (#25694 and #25696), I've set up a new set of
> builders[1] to build, install, and test the installed Python. They
> run on the same slav
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 04:04:37 +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 19/11/2015 3:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> > It would be nice to have that bot back, since IIRC it was one of the
> > fastest and so gave quick feedback on bad changesets.
>
> If mine are no longer the fastest
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:40:50 -0600, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Zachary Ware
> wrote:
> > I had intended to audit all of the builders and come up with a new
> > stable set months ago, but it hasn't happened yet. I'll see whether I
> > can find some time to get anywher
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 16:11:54 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:46 PM, R. David Murray
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
> >>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
> Should that be declared stable? It's proving that the test suite can
> run with full root privileges.
Sound good to me.
The ones mentioned in the other email I want
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:11:44 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> What's the plan about updating the list of stable builders?
>
> The current stable builders don't appear very stable (not all green).
At a quick glance it looks like those are bugs that need fixing, not
stability errors. We should ping
On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 07:54:01 +, "Papa, Florin"
wrote:
> The values for the requested fields are:
> Owner:Intel
> OS: Ubuntu 15.10 64-bit
> Architecture: Intel Core i7-6700K aka Skylake
The skylake is the unique aspect of this buildbot, so either that
14 matches
Mail list logo
