Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-18 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Zachary Ware wrote: > +angelico-debian-amd64 - all green Just FYI, I'm currently experiencing a partial network outage, which is impacting my ability to connect to the build farm. So these guys are probably all offline at the moment; they should be up again within

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-18 Thread Zachary Ware
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:56 PM, David Bolen wrote: > Just an FYI related to these: > >> "Iffy" (have failures that look related to the slave, but are >> platforms that should be stable. If I reshuffle right now, they'll be >> marked unstable): >> bolen-ubuntu >> bolen-windows >> bolen-windows8 >

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-18 Thread Zachary Ware
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote: > I do think we > want to resolve the bolen issues and not just move them to unstable, > though. I agree with that. > It looks like jcea brought the OpenIndiana buildbot back on-line, > but it seems to have gotten into trouble processing t

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-18 Thread R. David Murray
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 04:04:37 +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 19/11/2015 3:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote: > > It would be nice to have that bot back, since IIRC it was one of the > > fastest and so gave quick feedback on bad changesets. > > If mine are no longer the fastest, I have more work to do

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-18 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 19/11/2015 3:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote: > It would be nice to have that bot back, since IIRC it was one of the > fastest and so gave quick feedback on bad changesets. If mine are no longer the fastest, I have more work to do :] ___ Python-Buildbots

Re: [Python-buildbots] Stable builders

2015-11-18 Thread R. David Murray
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:40:50 -0600, Zachary Ware wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Zachary Ware > wrote: > > I had intended to audit all of the builders and come up with a new > > stable set months ago, but it hasn't happened yet. I'll see whether I > > can find some time to get anywher