New submission from Rahul :
Attempt to `make` Python 2.7.14 on Ubuntu 16.04/GCC 5.4 throws the following
error:
Objects/floatobject.c: In function ‘PyFloat_GetMax’:
Objects/floatobject.c:59:5: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction
return DBL_MAX;
^
Please submit a full bug
Rahul added the comment:
Thanks for your response. I'll follow up with GCC.
On Nov 28, 2017 14:48, "STINNER Victor" wrote:
>
> STINNER Victor added the comment:
>
> "internal compiler error" is a bug in GCC, not in Python. Please follow
> instructions
New submission from rahul :
what is the reason for this
--
components: 2to3 (2.x to 3.0 conversion tool)
messages: 91809
nosy: rahul1618
severity: normal
status: open
title: -1**2=-1
type: compile error
versions: Python 2.5
___
Python tracker
rahul added the comment:
>>>-1**2
>>>-1
???
what is reason for this
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6752>
___
___
Pytho
New submission from Rahul:
Snippet code is below:
from kafka import KafkaConsumer
from kafka.client import KafkaClient
from kafka.consumer import SimpleConsumer
consumer = KafkaConsumer('eventdetails_ingestion' ,
group_id='1',bootstrap_servers=‘:9092', max_parti
New submission from Rahul Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I am trying to save a csv file from a scope and then open it to post
process the data.
The file is getting created currectly, but when it tries to open the
csv file it complains about file not found. I am trying to do this in
a sing
Rahul Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I wrote a python GPIB command to the scope to export the waveform as a
csv file. Then in another function I try to read this file that I just
saved and it cannot find the file till I rerun.
___
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43978>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Rahul Kumaresan added the comment:
Although the documentation for 'typing.NoReturn' is made in:
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/7107/files
The actual inclusion of the 'typing.NoReturn' was made through the following
this PR: https://github.com/python/typing/pull/
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24247>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Rahul Kumaresan added the comment:
Hello Ken Jin, Thanks for this clarification!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43978>
___
___
Python-bug
New submission from Rahul Lakshmanan :
I face this error when trying to use a package called streamlit.
Streamlit calls Tornado which calls SSL.
File "C:\Users\\.conda\envs\stockprediction\lib\ssl.py", line 589,
in create_default_context
context.load_default_certs(purpose)
Rahul Lakshmanan added the comment:
Thanks for the answer!
When I upgraded Python to 3.8.12, the issue went away.
Can be closed.
--
resolution: -> works for me
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracke
New submission from Rahul Gupta :
On lines 725, 737 and 749 there is the following code:
'''for c in (self, other) for e in c''' which generates an iterable with all
the keys in self and other - casting c to a set will remove duplicates and
allow faster itera
Change by Rahul Gupta :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +28222
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/2
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Rahul Gupta added the comment:
After looking at this again, I agree with you - the key duplication issue seems
to have gone. Thank you for providing this feedback, it is very helpful.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46
Rahul Kumaresan added the comment:
I would like to work on this issue.
Can you please suggest me specifics that I should be considering before I
update the doc with the suggested inclusions.
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<ht
Rahul Kumaresan added the comment:
I would like to work on this documentation improvement task.
Please help me understand if this is not being worked on already.
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0
pull_requests: +18289
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18937
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Rahul Kumaresan :
In the whatsnew section, under the point which mentions the deprecation of
getchildren() and getiterator() through bpo-36543, it is suggested to use
iter() instead.
Ideally there should be a suggestion to use Element.iter() instead.
--
assignee
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39935>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue20039>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +18346
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18999
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Rahul B :
Even though item assignment throws error, the list inside tuple 'a' gets
modified in place. Refer below, where the list value [8] gets added to the list
value [5,6,7,7] at a[3]
>>> a
(2, 3, 4, [5, 6, 7, 7], 1)
>>> id(a[3])
14053121217
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40640>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40657>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40666>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40042>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40670>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: -rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40646>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40646>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40620>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25872>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27820>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue29860>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35783>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Jha :
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue12915>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Jha :
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34451>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Jha :
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30044>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: -rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40670>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Rahul Kumaresan added the comment:
I think the ommission of secondary prompt(...) at the end of the loop in the
code snippet doesn't affect what the example wanted to demonstrate. Even so, if
this has to be fixed, this correction is to be done in versions 3.5 through
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40725>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40579>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Rahul Jha added the comment:
Nick, hello! I'd like to take it onwards from here.
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue17490>
___
___
Rahul Jha added the comment:
Some of the test cases from Nick's patch are not passing on master:
ast.literal_eval('') # raises SyntaxError; expected: ValueError
ast.literal_eval('6j--3') # expected: 3+6j
ast.literal_eval('(2j+4j)+(1+2)') #
Change by Rahul Jha :
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Rahul Jha :
After configuring and building using the command:
./configure --with-pydebug ** make -j
I ran the test suite (without changing anything) and saw that test_pkg has
failed. Here is the output of `./python.exe -m test -v test_pkgutil`:
== CPython 3.10.0a0
Change by Rahul Jha :
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34360>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Rahul Jha added the comment:
> That may actually be another alternative: instead of doing the "try
> appending newlines and see if it works or generates different errors",
> we may be able to switch to the tokenizer if the initial compilation
> fails and check for hang
Rahul Jha added the comment:
> Note that these are two solution that take very different approaches. What
> Nick is suggesting with "checking for two or more hanging INDENTS" would
> drastically change how codeop._maybe_compile does its thing, while his other
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39326>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Kumaresan :
--
nosy: +rahul-kumi
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41822>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Rahul Virpara added the comment:
This happened to me when I used customized option and unticked "pip".
I assume you are not doing the same.
--
nosy: +Rahul Virpara
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.o
Rahul Jha added the comment:
Hi Ethan,
The only thing which is left is to change the Deprecation Warning to raise a
`TypeError` and alter the tests accordingly.
Seeing that most of the work for the issue has already been done, can I take it
forward from here on wards, please
Change by Rahul Jha :
--
pull_requests: +6347
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33217>
___
___
Python-bugs-lis
New submission from Rahul Ravindran :
make run_profile_task
runs the tests and does not seem to have any mechanism to exclude tests that I
could find based on looking at the Makefile.
Previously, on Python 3.6, this test test_poplib was
failing(https://bugs.python.org/issue32753) and the
Rahul Gupta added the comment:
isn't it logical?
[] is a mutable data structure
while () is a immutable data structure
(b, a) = [1, 2] is fine because a and b are mutable
--
nosy: +Rahul Gupta
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
New submission from Tangellapalli Sai Hanuma Rahul :
Feature Request:
Where we can use custom Names for separate threads submitted in
ThreadPoolExecutor.
It achieves by sending the name string to _work_queue of ThreadPoolExecutor and
then in _worker function modifies the name of the
Change by Tangellapalli Sai Hanuma Rahul :
--
hgrepos: +410
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +27619
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/29359
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Tangellapalli Sai Hanuma Rahul :
--
hgrepos: -410
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue45689>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by Tangellapalli Sai Hanuma Rahul :
--
versions: -Python 3.10, Python 3.11
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue45689>
___
___
Python-bug
Tangellapalli Sai Hanuma Rahul added the comment:
ThreadPool handles tasks concurrently through Threads so users need not worry
about the creation/deletion of Threads, it uses reuses threads whenever
possible and it can handle any tasks.
However, it should be possible for users to at least
Tangellapalli Sai Hanuma Rahul added the comment:
There is a new function submit_with_name in _base.Executor that can accept name
parameters before args and kwargs, submit can continue to be used as before.
submit internally calls submit_with_name with name as None. Calling
submit_with_name
Tangellapalli Sai Hanuma Rahul added the comment:
In summary;
==
Current Problem:
--
ThreadPoolExecutor handles all threads-related activities so the user needs to
just submit tasks and set max_workers and other Executor settings if necessary.
If ThreadPoolExecutor
Tangellapalli Sai Hanuma Rahul added the comment:
Yes, it's true, it's so naive method, Contextvars! may be inside the Future
Object?
--
resolution: -> rejected
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Pyt
65 matches
Mail list logo