Changes by lekma :
--
nosy: +lekma
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7330>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pyth
lekma added the comment:
Thank you very much for your help
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10271>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
New submission from lekma :
Overriding warnings.showwarning() with a c/python module function (from a
c/python module) doesn't work because warn_explicit() only allow PyFunction or
PyMethod objects to be called (unfortunately c/python module functions are of
type PyCFunction).
Sugg
lekma added the comment:
- split the patch between the actual fix and the test
- rewrote the test a little bit (I'm not sure it's even needed, hence the split)
- rediff against 3.3 (should still apply cleanly on top of 3.2 (modulo offset))
--
versions: +Python 3.3
Added
Changes by lekma :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21695/Issue10271.33.test.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10271>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
lekma added the comment:
Is there anything else I should be doing?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10271>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
lekma added the comment:
how should we go about that?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10271>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by lekma :
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20647/Issue10271.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10271>
___
___
lekma added the comment:
brett,
is there any chance for this to make it in?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10271>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
lekma added the comment:
thinking out loud here: maybe both behavior can be exposed, i.e. a
PyCapsule_Import that would expect a valid import statement and a Py_GetCapsule
that would behave more like getattr?
--
___
Python tracker
<ht
New submission from lekma :
shouldn't otherset be decrefed before returning on error in
set_symmetric_difference? if not, what am I missing?
--
components: Interpreter Core
files: setobject.c.diff
keywords: patch
messages: 315945
nosy: lekma
priority: normal
severity: normal
s
Change by lekma :
--
pull_requests: +6365
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33391>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
lekma added the comment:
> Good catch! Do you mind to create a pull request on GitHub?
done
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33391>
___
_
Change by lekma :
--
pull_requests: +6366
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33391>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by lekma :
--
pull_requests: +6367
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33391>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from lekma :
When capsule name is in the form 'package.module.capsule', PyCapsule_Import
fails with an AttributeError (module is never an attribute of package).
--
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 308950
nosy: lekma
priority: normal
severity: normal
st
lekma added the comment:
> PR 4988 will break the case 'module.attr.capsule' if 'module.attr' is
> not a module.
you are right, but is that a case you would expect in an import
statement?
--
___
Python tracker
<https
New submission from lekma :
Am I wrong in thinking 'filename_obj' should be decrefed before the last two
return statements in set_main_loader()? If yes, what am I missing?
--
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 317789
nosy: lekma
priority: normal
severity: normal
status:
lekma added the comment:
sorry, my mistake, I missed the format specifier in PyObject_CallFunction()
sorry for the noise
--
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Changes by lekma :
--
nosy: +lekma
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15870>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pyth
New submission from lekma :
It would be nice to have an obvious/simple way to document C exceptions
(especially when using the autoexception feature from Sphinx).
Something along:
PyObject *PyErr_Create(char *name, const char *doc)
Creates and returns a new exception object.
This
lekma added the comment:
First attempt at implementing this.
Diff is against trunk.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15021/issue7033_trunk.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
lekma added the comment:
The same against py3k
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15022/issue7033_py3k.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
lekma added the comment:
Even though I don't fully agree with your comments here is a second
attempt addressing them, against trunk.
For the record, I think that the signature difference is enough to
warrant a name that is a clear cut from PyErr_NewException.
And in the spirit o
lekma added the comment:
Same as previous against py3k
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15036/issue7033_py3k_2.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
Changes by lekma :
--
nosy: +lekma
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3605>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pyth
New submission from lekma :
It would be nice to have those.
See http://udrepper.livejournal.com/20407.html for background.
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 96482
nosy: lekma
severity: normal
status: open
title: add SOCK_NONBLOCK and SOCK_CLOEXEC to socket module
type: feature
lekma added the comment:
First attempt, against trunk.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15573/Issue7523.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
lekma added the comment:
better patch (mainly test refactoring).
still against trunk.
should I provide one against py3k?
--
components: +IO
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15578/Issue7523_2.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
lekma added the comment:
> - when importing fcntl, bear in mind that some systems don't have this
> module (e.g. Windows), so you should catch and silence the ImportError
would something like the following be ok?:
try:
import fcntl
except ImportError:
fcntl = False
an
lekma added the comment:
> It would be better to use test skipping: (eg: @unittest.SkipUnless
> before the test class).
I didn't know about this feature, thanks for the tip.
Now I wonder if it would be better to do it this way:
@unittest.SkipUnless(hasattr(socket, "SOCK_CLO
lekma added the comment:
this one addresses Antoines's comments (with the help of R. David Murray).
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15621/Issue7523_3.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
lekma added the comment:
Is there any chance that this will make it in?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7033>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
lekma added the comment:
patch against trunk:
- fix tabs issue (I hope)
- add test
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15645/issue7033_trunk_3.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
lekma added the comment:
The same with a simpler test.
I leave it up to you guys to choose which one is the best.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15646/issue7033_trunk_3_alt_test.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
lekma added the comment:
> Thanks for the patch! I rewrote the C function a bit to also take a dict
> argument, and added a test for that. Committed in r77088. Will merge
> to py3k.
Great!
Thanks to all for the help!
--
___
Python track
lekma added the comment:
> lekma, this patch is now listed in the 2.7 "what's new" document as
> contributed by "the lekma user", please tell us if you want your name
> there.
Nope, that's ok (it's perfect).
--
_
lekma added the comment:
> lekma, do you have a real name that we should add to the ACKS file?
no, lekma is fine (that's a nick I carry since childhood)
> Looking at it again, there's the question of accept() behaviour. [...]
Sorry for not having seen that earlier and thanks
New submission from lekma :
It would be useful to have the ability to run arbitrary code before a
manager's server subprocess is started (I'd use this feature to install
signal handlers for example).
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 84302
nosy: lekma
severity: normal
st
lekma added the comment:
here is a patch doing just that (against trunk).
ps: this is my first bug report and contribution to Python, please, be
gentle :)
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13438/Issue5585.patch
___
Python
lekma added the comment:
AFAIK there is no equivalent to the managers api in threading.
As for the tests, what kind of tests would you like to see? Jesse, some
thoughts on that?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
lekma added the comment:
> Right, it's just the Thread/Process API equivalance. I'm not saying
> it's a stopper, but the docs would probably need to be modified
> accordingly.
I'm a bit confused here. The patch only adds a small feature to
BaseManager and subtyp
lekma added the comment:
The same against py3k.
Jesse, is there any chance that this will make it in, or should I just
go and implement a local solution?
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13508/Issue5585_2_py3k.patch
___
Python tracker
lekma added the comment:
> I'm thinking about it and plan on discussing it with other core devs
> today. Altering the Api is not something done lightly
yep.
Thanks for considering it.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python
lekma added the comment:
thanks guys
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5585>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pyth
45 matches
Mail list logo
