Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
I reproduced this with 3.1.1 on xp. It took a while to get the shell menu to
restart as the calculation process is hogging the cpu 99%.
KeyboardInterrupt (^C) would not stop the runaway process. There may have been
other issues about this.
Two processes is
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
General policy is that ordinary code (not using, for instance, ctypes) should
not crash or segfault the interpreter. I believe there is a 'crashers'
subdirectory somewhere in the tree for examples that do so that people so
inclined can work on the
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
@dauerbaustelle
I believe your question is a separate issue and that it should have been asked
on Python list. However, yes, subclasses of immutables must override __new__.
For more, do ask on the list, not here
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Too late for 2.7, but I would like this to hit 3.2. Some calculators have
engineering format as an output option and it would be good for Python.
This issue is being discussed in python-list in thread "Engineering numerical
format...". The OP (
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8404>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Can this be closed, either as 'fixed' or 'obsolete' (too late)?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
___
Python tracker
<http://bu
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Tarek, when you set the resolution to 'accepted', did you mean to close this?
Resolutions are meant for closed issues.
--
nosy: +tjreedy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Since 'pending' is not implemented, should this be 'closed'?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http:/
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3620>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Fixed?, Out-of-date? (or in process?)
--
nosy: +tjreedy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2340>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3080>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Can this be closed as either fixed or out-or-date, as the case may be?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Resolution should only be set when an issue is closed. So should this be
closed? or unfixed and the versions updated?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
I am assuming that this is an unfixed bug that might still be fixed in 2.7
sometime and that it should not be closed yet, so I am just updating the
version.
--
nosy: +tjreedy
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2380>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Ok, I though 2.7 was in feature freeze.
Updating version.
--
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
I would close this, but I am not sure what the resolution should be.
--
nosy: +tjreedy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Can this be closed as either out-of-date or rejected?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3328>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3536>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3957>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4262>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3433>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
In the absence of further complaints, this appears to really be fixed. Should
it be closed as such?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Closing this pending 2.4 Irix issue as out of date.
Martin, reopen if you object.
--
nosy: +tjreedy
resolution: -> out of date
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5407>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5494>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue785031>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1004810>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1473979>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue658693>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Is everything fixed, so this can be closed?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1367628>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1027>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6788>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Skip, can we close this?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6941>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1756343>
___
___
Pyth
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Should this be closed? As out of date?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Too late for new 2.7 features.
--
nosy: +tjreedy
resolution: -> out of date
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6306>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1155>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
2.5 is frozen. 2.6 and 3.1 are in bug-fix mode only, and 2.7 is in beta so new
features are unlikely there. So I recommend doing a patch against 3.1 or even
the 3.2 trunk. And of course, make sure this proposal makes sense for 3.x.
--
nosy: +tjreedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
The fix works for 3.1.2, giving
TypeError: iter() returned non-iterator of type 'BadIterator'
Too late to patch 2.5. Is there any intention of patching 2.6 before its final
bug-fix release, in a couple of months?
--
keywords: -needs rev
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Double underscore name mangling is for avoiding name clashes with base classes,
not for 'private attributes'. This is such an advanced and rarely used feature
that it hardly seems appropriate for the tutorial.
--
nosy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
u'whatever' is not valid syntax for 3.x.
In any case, with IDLE on my WinXP 3.1.2 system, all string literals are green,
with or without a leading b.
If you want this to stay open, cut and paste the opening header like
Python 3.1.2 (r312:79149, M
New submission from Terry J. Reedy :
As reported on python-list by Alan G Isaac,
Lib Ref 6.1.3.1. Format Specification Mini-Language, for instance
http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/library/string.html#formatstrings
wrongly says in the alignment section
"'<'Forces the field
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4653>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
PEP 101 now says
___ If this is a final release, also unpack the HTML docs to
/data/ftp.python.org/pub/docs.python.org/release/X.Y[.Z].
___ If this is a major release: Tell the DE to adapt redirects for
docs.python.org/X.Y in the
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2716>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1397>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3006>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3710>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1745035>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1615>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1868>
___
___
Python-bug
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
'works for me' contradicts 'open', so I unset that
--
nosy: +tjreedy
resolution: works for me ->
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http:/
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5180>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue886488>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.3, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2437>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5464>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3699>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Is this still an issue for 2.7?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1451466>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1599254>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1646068>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1669539>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4608>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5945>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1598083>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4188>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2 -Python 2.5, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1621>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1621>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2122>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5219>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Neal committed changes for 2.4,2.5, so I removed those.
3.0 is dead. Is this an issue for 3.1,3.2 or should it be closed?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2
Changes by Terry J. Reedy :
--
versions: -Python 2.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7152>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
I have the strong impression that Carbon is no longer used (or is being phased
out) in modern Mac ports of Python. Reopen is this is wrong and there is a
problem in 2.6,7 or 3.1,2.
--
nosy: +tjreedy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open ->
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
To my mind, the inaccurate result is a bug that should be fixed.
Note: (3.0a3)
>>> 10e40/10e39
10.0
The rationale for the division change is that (as far as reasonably
possible) arithmetic operations with same values should g
New submission from Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Python 3.0a3 (r30a3:61161, Mar 1 2008, 22:51:17) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on win32
>>> a,b=1,1//1
>>> a is b
False
IDLE 3.0a3
>>> a,b=1,1//1
>>> a is b
True
ditto for 2.5.2 interpreter
Changes by Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
title: Integer floor division (//): small int check omitted -> [py3k] Integer
floor division (//): small int check omitted
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Changes by Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file9754/posix-strerror.diff
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Removed earlier version
--
nosy: +tjreedy
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2413>
__
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I agree that this is not a bug in the strict sense. I could have
selected Type: resource usage (for memory increase). But the change of
behavior is also visible. I suspect the change is not intentional both
because of the patte
Changes by Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: -tjreedy
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2413>
__
___
Python-bugs
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
The fact that other languages have factorial does not in itself impress
me. What is the actual use case other than illustrating computational
induction (whether by iteration or recursion) and for calculating
binomial coefficients?
I
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
While I agree with Raymond that the interpreter should be left alone,
this could be reclassified (and reopened) as a doc issue. The current
trace doc (Lib Ref 25.10) says rather tersely "The trace module allows
you to trace progra
New submission from Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>From py3 devel list today:
> r23331 | gvanrossum | 2001-09-25 05:56:29 +0200 (Di, 25 Sep 2001) | 5
lines
>
> Change repr() of a new-style cl
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Finish the change from 'type' to 'class'
(See carefully written title ;-)
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
New submission from Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Based on c.l.p discussion with Mark Dickinson, who supplied details and
corrections, we propose the following for the int() entry at
http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#int
int([number | string[, radix]])
Convert a
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I consider the difference between builtin and def'ed functions to be
something of an implementation wart -- one that I would like to see
someday removed if sensibly possible. How is a beginner to know that
the parameter names
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Ludovico quoted from LangReg 5.3.4 of old style doc. The same paragraph
about keyword args is under Expressions/Primaries/Calls in the 2.6/3.0 docs
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
What module is this in that you want to change?
Note 1: hashlib checks upper and lower case versions of names.
So this seems like reasonable request.
Note 2: I would start hashlib.__get_builtin_constructor(name):
with 'name =
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Whoops, just checked the title.
Function is about 2/3rds down in urllib2.
comments still apply
Note 4: I consider 'name = lambda ...' inferior to 'def name...'
but I am not
Changes by Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2695>
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http
Changes by Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2695>
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Function is about 2/3rds down in urllib2.
Note 1: hashlib checks upper and lower case versions of names.
So this seems like reasonable request.
Note 2: I would start hashlib.__get_builtin_constructor(name):
with 'name = name.l
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I like the two changes: jump to command line and scroll previous command
lines without having to search back up through the output. Just don't
imitate the Windows terminal too closely with its inability to just
select prev
Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Does this/will this supercede
http://bugs.python.org/issue2690
?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
New submission from Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Filter() allows None as a stand-in for either the still-nonexistent
identity() or the now existent bool(). Removing the now redundant
option would slightly simplify the language. It is certainly a glitch
for newcomers. Would this
New submission from Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
StdLibMan Built-in Functions
I believe that at one time this section only contained functions.
But this has not been true since at least 2.2.
Please add "and Classes" to the title and first sentence.
Possibly add "
1401 - 1500 of 12707 matches
Mail list logo