[issue34773] sqlite3 module inconsistently returning only some rows from a table

New submission from Shankar : I am running a Python based system on an Android phone. The database is in Sqlite3. It has been running well for approximately five years now, with various upgraded phones, changes to the system, etc. However, in the last week or so, there has been a problem in

[issue39868] Stale Python Language Reference docs (no walrus).

SHANKAR JHA added the comment: Can I take this issue? -- nosy: +shankarj67 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue39868> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list m

[issue39868] Stale Python Language Reference docs (no walrus).

SHANKAR JHA added the comment: Thank you for that!!! Can you please provide some pointers to what exactly I have to do? -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue39

[issue39868] Stale Python Language Reference docs (no walrus).

SHANKAR JHA added the comment: This is my first contribution to Python. This is why I am looking for some guidance, just point me to some resource, and then I will look into it thoroughly. I am reading this https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/ for better understanding

[issue39868] Stale Python Language Reference docs (no walrus).

SHANKAR JHA added the comment: Thank you for helping me out brandtbucher. As per my understanding, I am looking into the code (https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Doc/reference/expressions.rst) and finding where the code doesn't follow the pattern described in (

[issue39868] Stale Python Language Reference docs (no walrus).

SHANKAR JHA added the comment: I am also checking your commit for this: (https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/8bae21962bab2fac7630982abd73676b89930902) and see that you are changing the "expression: to "assignment_expression". Do I have to fill what assignment expression

[issue39868] Stale Python Language Reference docs (no walrus).

SHANKAR JHA added the comment: I got it that I have to fill the "Assignment expression" section in the code. I am working on it and send you the for review once I am done. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.o

[issue39868] Stale Python Language Reference docs (no walrus).

SHANKAR JHA added the comment: I have created my draft with an example but I am confused about where exactly do I have to add the code and push it. I have cloned these two repositories in my system and setup everything: https://github.com/python/cpython https://github.com/python/devguide 1

[issue39702] PEP 614: Relaxing Grammar Restrictions On Decorators

Change by SHANKAR JHA : -- nosy: +shankarj67 nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0 pull_requests: +18208 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18851 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue39868] Stale Python Language Reference docs (no walrus).

SHANKAR JHA added the comment: I have added the pull request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18851. Please check it out and let me know if I need to change anything. Thank you everyone for your guidance. -- ___ Python tracker <ht

[issue39868] Stale Python Language Reference docs (no walrus).

Change by SHANKAR JHA : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +18213 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18851 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue36200] display index on Index

Change by Aditya Shankar : -- nosy: Aditya Shankar priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: display index on Index ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue36

[issue36200] display index on IndexError

Change by Aditya Shankar : -- components: +Interpreter Core title: display index on Index -> display index on IndexError type: -> enhancement versions: +Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/i

[issue36200] display index on IndexError

New submission from Aditya Shankar : considering a list of 5 elements, if the 6th element is asked, the Interpreter would raise IndexError: list index out of range, I think It'd be better if it actually said what the invalid index is Improvement benefits: *quicker debugging of faulty p

[issue36200] display index on IndexError

Aditya Shankar added the comment: closed as this is a duplicate for https://bugs.python.org/issue18162 -- stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/i

[issue36628] Enhancement: i-Strings

New submission from Aditya Shankar : Problem: multiline strings are a pain to represent (other than of-course in docstrings), representing a multiline string inside a function looks something like this - def foo(): # some code ... ... # some code text = """

[issue36628] Enhancement: i-Strings

Change by Aditya Shankar : -- resolution: postponed -> duplicate ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue36628> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mai

[issue21302] time.sleep (floatsleep()) should use clock_nanosleep() on Linux

New submission from Shankar Unni: I know that an earlier request to use nanosleep() has been rejected as "wontfix", but I'm filing this one for a different reason. Today, timemodule.c:floatsleep() calls select() on platforms that support it. On Linux, select() with a

[issue21302] time.sleep (floatsleep()) should use clock_nanosleep() on Linux

Shankar Unni added the comment: I'm working on a patch, but I noticed a similar issue in Condition.wait(), which also keeps re-evaluating the "remaining sleep time" based on the current kernel clock, with similar effects. I'll try to address both issues, or we could ope

[issue21302] time.sleep (floatsleep()) should use clock_nanosleep() on Linux

Shankar Unni added the comment: > If you want to modify time.sleep(), you must be careful of the portability: > Windows, Linux, but also Mac OS X, FreeBSD, Solaris, etc. Oh, I totally agree. What I'm trying to do is to define another autoconf flag (HAVE_CLOCK_NANOSLEEP), that doe

[issue44549] BZip 1.0.6 Critical Vulnerability

New submission from siddhartha shankar mahato : Python (3.9.5 and 3.9.6 are using Bzip2 1.0.6 which has a known critical vulnerability. CVE-2019-12900 (BDSA-2019-1844) 9.8 Critical NVD CVE-2016-3189 (BDSA-2019-2036). Please upgrade the same to a stable version. -- components