Changes by Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3609>
___
___
Python
Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Hello Mez, I don't think this will be implemented in the language. There
have discussions on supporting braces (as accessibility mechanism)
before, but it is not generally agreed upon.
I would like to point to you the discussion betwee
New submission from Senthil :
Hi,
I am trying to install Python 2.6.5 in IBM AIX(6.1) machine. The make seems to
failing with the following error.
Fatal Python error: Interpreter not initialized (version mismatch?)
make: *** [sharedmods] IOT/Abort trap (core dumped)
--
components
Senthil added the comment:
Hi ocroquette,
Even though I have seen ftp sites requesting email addresses as user
names, I would rather put this issue for discussion as this not per any RFC.
urlparse is based upon RFC1808 and it points to RFC1738 for the URL
Syntax. RFC1738 specifically says
Senthil added the comment:
Irrespective of the patch, this issue is reproducable with the code in the
trunk for Python 2.6. Should we close this then?
n 2.6a0 (trunk:59600M, Dec 25 2007, 13:54:34)
[GCC 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat 3.4.2-6.fc3)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright
Senthil added the comment:
>
> Senthil added the comment:
>
> Irrespective of the patch, this issue is reproducable with the code in the
> trunk for Python 2.6. Should we close this then?
> __
Sorry, I meant to say
Senthil added the comment:
> Olivier Croquette added the comment:
>
>
> The problem right now is that urlparse parses silently an URL which is
> not compliant, but does the wrong thing with it (since usernames can
> contain @, and hostname can not, it's a more logical th
Senthil added the comment:
>
> Olivier Croquette added the comment:
>
> And about the decoding, sorry, it's clear from your snippets that
> urlparse doesn't do it:
> >>> print q.username
> user%40xyz
>
> Maybe it should do it, I am not sure. W
Senthil added the comment:
> I feel that "alias" is the wrong word to use here, though I don't know
> a suitable replacement.
Should we say, "The older built-in open() serves the same purpose as file."
--
nosy: +orsenthil
_
Senthil added the comment:
If we observe carefully in the urlparse.py and test_urlparse.py, over
the releases from Python 2.3 to Python 2.6, the changes required for
supporting RFC2396 has been implemented. (RFC2396 replaced 1808 in URL
Specification.)
But the header of urlparse.py still says it
Senthil added the comment:
Hi Guido,
I have added the unit tests, tested it on my system and created a new patch
combining the previous one against the trunk.
You can verify and check in this.
Thank you,
Senthil
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9054/issue1698-withtests.patch
Senthil added the comment:
Thank you, Yes having it in the 2.5.2 would be a good idea. The bug
report is also on 2.5 only.
I have attached the patch for the release25-maint branch.
Thanks,
Senthil
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9102/issue6898-r25-maint.patch
Senthil added the comment:
The patch against the trunk could also have been applied to 2.5. There
is NO change in the trunk and 2.4-maint patch.
Thanks,
Senthil
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/
Senthil added the comment:
> Georg Brandl added the comment:
>
> There are quite a lot more functions in __all__, more than 10 split*
> functions... should they all be documented?
>
> Also, isn't urlparse meant to do such tasks?
I agree. I too feel that not everyth
Senthil added the comment:
I don't think this is a valid issue. If you browse through the RFC 1808
you will find that.
1) For net_loc information it refers to a broad section 1738 and we wont
specifically find any information on port number in that.
2) But, have a look at the BNF Represent
Senthil added the comment:
Should this 'undesirable' behavior be documented? My thoughts are
a) All the key,value pairs in the named section be retrived from entire
file. Just appending the dict.
Otherwise,
b) An Exception can be thrown if it encounters an invalid Configfile
havin
Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I understand your implementation of _cap_header_key function.
But should not this patch be handled in a way wherein.
key.capitalize() is just replaced by key.upper()?
Should not that suffice?
What is the difference between _cap_header_k
Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Hi John, Greetings!
I agree with both of your suggestions.
Attached is the patch which aims to implement both in one go.
Please provide your comments on that.
If this method is okay, I shall go ahead with patches for tests and
attach i
Changes by Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file9906/issue2275.patch
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2275>
__
_
Changes by Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9907/issue2275.patch
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2275>
__
_
Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
John, issue3647 tries relative url parsing and joins to be RFC3986
compliance.
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
http://bugs.python.org/issue4079
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
This report almost seems like a bug with urlparse, but it is not. We
have to consider certain cases here.
1) First of all, we cannot equate urlparsing, urlsplit, urljoin with
path normalization provided by posixpath.normalize. The reason is t
Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
> Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
>
> Reopening: I reproduce the problem consistently with both 2.6 and trunk
> versions (not with python 3.0), on Windows XP.
>
I think this bug is ONLY
Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I agree, gregory. I had verified the fix and supplied patch for py2.6
and py3K. If those still apply to the trunk, I think we should go ahead,
otherwise I shall come with the new patch for 2.7/3k.
___
Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I verified this bug in the Py3.0 and Py3.1. Shall come out with a patch
for it.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Changes by Senthil :
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4217>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pyth
New submission from Senthil :
I am not sure, if this is intentional. But if you look at Python 3k and
3.1 installation.
changing mode of /usr/local/bin/pydoc to 755
changing mode of /usr/local/bin/idle to 755
changing mode of /usr/local/bin/2to3 to 755
changing mode of /usr/local/bin/smtpd.py
Senthil added the comment:
Here is a patch to fix the issue.
Jeremy, is it approach okay? Or do you have any other suggestion?
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12410/issue4608_py31.diff
___
Python tracker
<h
Changes by Senthil :
--
versions: +Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4608>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Senthil added the comment:
This issue makes a request to implement, plain-text inurl password
authentication like "https://user:passw...@host:port/ for HTTP Basic
Authentication. " for urllib2.
As per rfc3986, this is strongly discouraged and is deprecated.
See the section: 3.
New submission from Senthil :
This is a new change in the documentation.
Tutorial -> More Control Flow Tools -> pass Statements
There is a new section which says:
"However, as pass is silently ignored, a better choice may be to raise a
NotImplementedError exception:""&quo
Senthil added the comment:
Derek,
This patch was along the lines that when IPv6 address is present, return
the first address,which I assumed to be active address and would make
the urllib2 work.
I am not sure, if returning all the addresses would help and how would
we define which address to
Senthil added the comment:
> I am a little confused by this though. It looks like
> FileHandler.file_open() checks if there is a hostname in the URL, and
> if so, uses FTPHandler instead. So why does FileHandler.open_local_file
> check the hostname value?
You are right. Even I
Senthil added the comment:
Jakub,
I have attached a revision to the patch.
You are right, when __iter__ returns self.fp (as in previous patch), the
__next__ is superflous.
But, I was thinking of __iter__ returning an instance of addbase,
instead of self.fp and in that case __next__ was
Senthil added the comment:
I also think that documentation should be improved for
round(number, [ndigits]). The doc/help says, ndigits can be negative,
but does not really say what it means to be negative.
It can be confusing to anyione. Take the following example:
>>> round(26.
Senthil added the comment:
> I'd like to add the ability to parse nfs url (rfc2224). Which look like:
> nfs://server/my/path
>
> To do this, we only need to add 'nfs' in uses_netloc to make it work
Do you encounter any errors or weird behaviors while using nfs ur
Senthil added the comment:
Terry, I think you mean the Sidebar content, right?
Yes, I agree with you. It would be desirable to have the Sidebar
Fixed, while we scroll the document (Like this:
http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/)
This has to be worked out in the Sphnix CSS.
--
nosy
New submission from Senthil :
When using the python debugger, most often I step ('s') through the
code base and I often Call the standard library modules, whichever are
imported in the scripts.
This is often not desirable as I know that errors are within my modules
and not in standa
Changes by Senthil :
--
components: +Library (Lib)
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5142>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Senthil added the comment:
Sorry to bring this fixed-closed issue back again.
I see that this was committed in a hurry.
Either, shutil.destinsrc should be Documented, there currently does not
exists any documentation to explain what destinsrc is supposed to do, or
the function should be made
Senthil added the comment:
Thanks for the quick action. Really nice.
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2047>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Senthil added the comment:
And that is how it is at all others places too. Optionals are placed inside [].
--
nosy: +orsenthil
title: urllib2.build_opener([handler, ...]) incorrect signature in docs ->
urllib2.build_opener(
___
Python trac
New submission from Senthil :
In the Document, : Doc/library/optparse.rst,
The first usage example is given with an '=' sign for the options. This
is a mistake.
---file=outfile -q
+--file outfile -q
--
assignee: georg.brandl
components: Documentation
messages:
Senthil added the comment:
Georg, Ignore this bug. This is Invalid and sorry for the confusion.
I was trying with single option with '=' sign.
May be, I have forgotten the Unix standard that '=' symbol goes with
'--' options only.
If other people also ge
Senthil added the comment:
I noticed this one yesterday. There is a similar issue Issue1424152, the
fix for which is available in Py2.7. Would you try to that patch?
--
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Changes by Senthil :
--
assignee: -> orsenthil
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1448934>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Senthil added the comment:
This is actually fixed in Py2.7 and I am trying to get it Py3.2 before
marking this as fixed.
Based on the comments, should this be backported to Py2.6?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1424
Senthil added the comment:
Fixed and committed in revision 74089 and revision 74090.
Should this be backported?
--
resolution: -> fixed
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
New submission from Senthil :
Just noticed this while fixing another bug issue5102.
Need to figure out why urllib.urlopen does not have timeout in the first
account and if it was due to some overlook, then:
1) add timeout parameter to urllib.urlopen
2) propage it across redirects.
It may not
Changes by Senthil :
--
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5102>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Senthil added the comment:
backported to release26-maint in the revision 74093
and release31-maint in the revision 74092
Closing this issue.
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Changes by Senthil :
--
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5102>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Senthil added the comment:
Fixed for 3.2 in py3k branch revision 74198. Asked python-dev for
objections on back porting changes 2.6.
Shall back port changes to py2.6 and py3.1
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1424
Changes by Senthil :
--
resolution: -> fixed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1424152>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Senthil :
--
assignee: -> orsenthil
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6557>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Senthil added the comment:
Agreed to the suggestions made by Greg.
The fix is now backported.
For Py2.6 in the revision 74203.
For Py3k in the revision 74204.
Closing this issue.
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyth
Senthil added the comment:
Well, the fix for this same as that for Issue1424152.
Closing this issue as it is already handled.
--
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Senthil added the comment:
sorin:
You meant the commands module, correct?
It is well documented in the commands reference:
http://docs.python.org/library/commands.html
* It is applicable to unix only.
* the getstatusoutput is moved to subprocess in 3x.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
Senthil added the comment:
I would also suggest run the following command:
$python /usr/local/lib/python2.6/test/regrtest.py -v test_urllib2
test_urllib test_socket > output-of-tests.txt
And attach output-of-tests.txt. It might help in getting to
the root cause of the issue.
--
n
Senthil added the comment:
Thanks for the update. I am closing this as Invalid.
--
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Senthil added the comment:
This bug is already fixed in trunk (Python2.7) and py3k branch -
Issue918368.
I see that the fix was not backported, I shall do that (once the svn is up).
--
resolution: -> accepted
versions: +Python 2.6 -Python
Changes by Senthil :
--
assignee: -> orsenthil
resolution: -> accepted
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1712522>
___
Senthil added the comment:
The way to handle this issue would be add these characters
'%/:=&?~#+!$,;'@()*[]' to always_safe list.
There has been a similar issue in the past Issue918368, tough in a
different context.
And if you see, urllib.urlopen function always passes t
Senthil added the comment:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 03:40:47PM +, Nir Soffer wrote:
> for query string. This will break exiting code that assume the default
> safe parameters.
>
> Other characters may be unsafe in other parts of the url - I did not
I agree with your commen
Senthil added the comment:
Fixed and Committed revision 74462
--
resolution: accepted -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Senthil added the comment:
Thanks for the patch.
Fixed it and
Committed revision 74469 - py3.2
Committed revision 74470 - py3.1 maint.
I wonder how it got unnoticed so far.
--
assignee: -> orsenthil
nosy: +orsenthil
resolution: ->
Senthil added the comment:
I am assigning this to myself. I shall do some research on this issue +
plus current standings by other clients/libraries and come out with a
summary.
--
assignee: -> orsenthil
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyth
Senthil added the comment:
I agree with John on this ticket. At the outset, this is Not a bug.
And reading through the referenced ticket indicates the design decision
for the behavior.
In summary:
This suggests to me that *no* automatic repeat of POST
requests should ever be done, and that in
Changes by Senthil :
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6711>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Senthil added the comment:
I see adding this information to the docs, might clarify a bit.
"By default, this function is intended for quoting the path section of
the URL."
This is already present in the function docstring.
If there is no objection, I shall commit the attached
Changes by Senthil :
--
assignee: -> orsenthil
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1755841>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Senthil :
--
assignee: -> orsenthil
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue735515>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Senthil :
--
assignee: -> orsenthil
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5007>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Senthil added the comment:
Fixed and
Committed revision 74608 - trunk
Committed revision 74609 - py3k
--
resolution: -> fixed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Senthil added the comment:
Yes, this is a duplicate of issue858809 and tarek is assigned to that
one too.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Senthil added the comment:
Alexandru: You commented on a closed issue. If you see any problem
with mimetypes.guess_type() w.r.t to .ogg files, please open a new
open stating your problem.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker
<h
Senthil added the comment:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 04:35:37AM +, Terry J. Reedy wrote:
> Was 2.x different?
Even in 2.x it returns
{}
And I thought that was expected. Even I am confused by the free
variable explaination as you pointed out. Perhaps, Georg could explain
bet
Senthil added the comment:
I think it is okay to close this, with Martin's Howto.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python
Senthil added the comment:
Please close this, Daniel.
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4191>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Senthil added the comment:
Yup, This should be closed too. Thanks.
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5072>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Senthil added the comment:
I got into thinking if sphinx-dev or docutils be the best place for this ticket?
Python Documentation is nothing but ReStructured text and it is
required to create a rst2epub that would convert restructured text to
epub format. If you are already aware of any such
Senthil added the comment:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:12 PM, wrobell wrote:
> probably sphinx/docutils "deserve" their own tickets,
I agree with your points and I would wait for Georg's call on this ticket.
It would definitely help if you have already raised any tickets at
Senthil added the comment:
And also look at the help on string.replace which sets -1 as the
default value for maxsplit optional argument and which again defaults
to replace-all.
Clearly, maxsplit= -1 is not equal to maxsplit = 0.
replace(s, old, new, maxsplit=-1)
replace (str, old, new
Senthil added the comment:
Would someone like to point the python-ideas discussion which
rationalizes this request?
And what would be written in the documentation? As much as I
understand this, emptry braces {} for replacement fields is kind of
unseen and leaves much thinking if this can be
Senthil added the comment:
Confirming this bug. It seems to be the case with the code in py3k trunk
also.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13418/unnamed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Changes by Senthil :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file13418/unnamed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5560>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Senthil added the comment:
This is issue is FIXED in the trunk code. Please ignore my previous
comment.
The problem area is in between line 350-352 in the Python 3.0:pydoc.py
module.
348 docloc = os.environ.get("PYTHONDOCS",
349 "http://
Senthil added the comment:
Verified the patch. Added unittest.
Can be applied against the trunk (py27) and py3k (3.1)
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13479/issue4675-py27.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4
Changes by Senthil :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13481/issue4675-py3k.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4675>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Senthil added the comment:
Georg, I think this can be closed as invalid. Thanks.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5208>
___
___
Python-bug
Senthil added the comment:
Patch to fix this. Looked into the RFCs and I do not find a reason why
the nfs://server/path/to/file.txt should not be parsed as:
>>> urlparse.urlsplit('nfs://server/path/to/file.txt')
SplitResult(scheme='nfs', netloc='server
Changes by Senthil :
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13490/issue4962-py27.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4
Changes by Senthil :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13491/issue4962-py3k.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4962>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Senthil added the comment:
Fixed.
--
assignee: -> orsenthil
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Senthil added the comment:
fixed.
--
assignee: -> orsenthil
resolution: -> fixed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4962>
___
___
Pyth
Changes by Senthil :
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4962>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Senthil added the comment:
I spent sometime on the patch which replaces the self.msg usage with
self.headers in http.client. Everything is fine.
The next step is to provide an interface in the urllib.response and the
equivalent changes to py2k.
--
assignee: georg.brandl -> jhyl
Senthil added the comment:
Nope, this is not yet fixed.
$ ./python
Python 3.1a1+ (py3k:70929, Mar 31 2009, 19:18:12)
[GCC 4.3.2] on linux2
...
...
>>> f_bytes = urllib.request.urlopen("http://www.python.org";)
>>> f_string = io.TextIOWrapper(f_bytes,"iso
New submission from Senthil :
In Py2x, have this code:
import urllib
s = urllib.urlopen('http://www.python.org')
print s
Run 2to3, on this, refactoring works only on import urllib and print
statements.
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-import urllib
+import urllib.request, urllib.parse, urlli
101 - 200 of 1805 matches
Mail list logo
