Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Thanks for the bug report Alan & for the PR Ngalim!
I've checked the current docs and this is a valid bug.
I've also reviewed the Pull request and it looks good to me.
@Mariatta, @Senthil can you please have a look at this?
Many thanks!
-
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
I've checked and approved this PR.
This needs a core-review now.
Thanks, Hai for your contribution.
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner, Mariatta
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Duplicate of Issue 37854
Fatih,
Thank you for your report. I'm marking this one as a duplicate of another.
Request you to not create multiple issues at once for the same thing.
Thank you!
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
resolution: -> duplica
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Closed Issue 37853 as a duplicate.
Adding Fatih's comment from there for urllib.parse.urlparse
-
No problem for these:
"http://localhost:9100";
"http://user:password@l
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40358>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +13409
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21914>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Mariatta, I see it also needs a backport to 3.8
We can close it once the backport is completed.
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Backport successfully completed. Marking this as fixed.
Congrats on your first patch, Krishna!
Thank you, everyone!
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
_
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
I was trying to search the mailing list archives for the URL posted by Eric:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2011-May/1272604.html
But I couldn't find it. Also that URL shows 404.
Eric, is it possible for you to post the correct
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hi Alexander,
Can you please address the reviews and turn this patch into a GitHub PR, please?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue16
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
I'm changing the versions to Python 3.8 and 3.9 for this bug.
--
versions: +Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hi Jakub,
Welcome and thank you for contributing. I've added a suggestion on your pull
request.
Python 3.6 and Python 3.5 are in security fixes stage, so I've removed those
tags from this bug.
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
type: -> beha
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Removing 3.5 as it is in security fix mode. Also, the PR just contains the test
case that would trigger the condition and not the actual code.
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
stage: -> patch review
versions: +Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hey ankostis,
Please let us know if you've time to complete the PR.
Thank you :)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32912>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Adding 3.9 to this bug. I've reviewed the PR and it looks good to me.
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
versions: +Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
versions: +Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37819>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +14935
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15206
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hi Eric,
This is with reference to https://bugs.python.org/issue10528.
I've looked at the PR and it's ready for a core-review:
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15161
Can you please take a look at this?
Many thanks!
--
nosy
New submission from Sanyam Khurana:
While working on issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue30597 to enhance the custom
error message by showing expected output in Python3 syntax when someone uses
Python2 syntax, a PR was raised: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/2009,
where we just handled
Changes by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +2390
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30721>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Ah, sorry for that. I'll just fix that right away in a few mins :)
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Changes by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +3165
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30721>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
assignee: -> CuriousLearner
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25439>
___
___
Python-
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
I'm working on applying the patch cleanly to master branch for this.
Also adding 3.8 and 3.7 as candidates for the bug.
--
versions: +Python 3.7, Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +9862
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25439>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
PR is up for a review: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/10616
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +9886, 9887
stage: test needed -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24746>
___
___
Py
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +9886
stage: test needed -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24746>
___
___
Python-
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
> Unfortunately I was reminded a few days ago that there is a commit hook that
> prevents patches containing trailing whitespace from being committed to the
> repository.
Is this still the case?
I tried to figure out writing the test case, but I c
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Thanks for your suggestion, Tim.
I've fixed the patch and it is ready for review at
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/10639
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
assignee: -> CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24746>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hey R. David Murray,
Where do you think the unit test for `doctest` should be placed?
Should it be in `test_doctest.py`?
--
assignee: -> CuriousLearner
versions: +Python 3.7, Python 3.8
___
Python trac
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
keywords: +patch, patch
pull_requests: +10670, 10671
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +10670
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35614>
___
___
Py
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
keywords: +patch, patch, patch
pull_requests: +10670, 10671, 10672
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +10999
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24746>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +10999, 11000
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24746>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hi Victor,
Senthil reverted the backport commit on 2.7 branch.
Is there a way I can test reference leaks in CPython? Is it using valgrind or
some other tool? Can you please point me to that?
I can then see if I can fix this on 2.7
Thanks
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +11416
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31506>
___
___
Python-
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +11416, 11417
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31506>
___
_
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +11416, 11417, 11418
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hi, I'm working on this issue.
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29710>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +1784
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29710>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hi,
If this work is not being actively worked on, can I work on this and fix the
remaining links?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hi r.david.murray,
What error do you think should be raised in this case, when path is an instance
of str?
I'll issue a PR once I know what end results are expected.
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tr
Changes by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +2006
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24744>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +2010
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25910>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
I've updated the PR with required changes along with the test. Please have a
look and let me know if any changes are needed.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hi Nick,
Can I work on this issue?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30597>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +2075
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30597>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
I'm working on applying this patch cleanly and writing a test for this.
However, it seems I'm unable to import `readline` in compiled version of
Python. I'm trying to provide a path to the installation of readline in my
system using LD
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Given that Python 2.x and async chat is deprecated in favor of new async io,
we're better in closing this issue, rather than trying to apply this cleanly on
the master branch.
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
resolution: -> out of date
stage: patc
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hello Anjali,
This PR is still lurking for your updates from almost 11 months. Please let us
know if you're still working on this, else, we'll get this in.
Thanks for your work!
--
___
Python track
New submission from Sanyam Khurana :
While working on translations, I saw a minor grammatical error in
`Doc/glossary.rst`:
```
* The default Python prompt of the interactive shell when entering
code for an indented code block ...
```
should be
```
* The default Python
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +13058
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hey Ron,
Friendly ping :)
Can you please convert this into a pull request?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
versions: +Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue18
New submission from Sanyam Khurana :
I was testing this issue: https://bugs.python.org/issue10598
I checked both Python 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 and tagged commit v3.7.0 but I'm not able
to run the test suite on any of them. I'm currently working on MacOS Mojave
10.14.4
I landed on i
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
title: Test Suite not working on 3.4 and 3.5 on MacOS Mojave -> Test Suite not
working on 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 on MacOS Mojave
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
I had to clean-up my build a bit, and it seems like it's not really happening
on 3.6, but it is still an issue with 3.4, 3.5, etc.
I've added a PR for 3.5 to resolve the issue.
--
assignee: -> CuriousLearner
title: Test Suite not w
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +13083
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36836>
___
___
Py
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
The issue does not seem to be on 3.7 and master branch, so I'm closing the bug
as well as the pull request.
--
resolution: -> out of date
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
versions: +Python 3.5, Python 3
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +13135
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue18387>
___
___
Python-bugs-lis
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +13170
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36822>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Victor, there is just one last thing to do in here.
All the links pointing to Github (that are build automatically) are permanently
redirected from https://github.com/python/cpython/tree/master/* to
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/*
I will
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Thanks for the report Mayank!
As we discussed offline, it is indeed reproducible if someone uses `print` on
the same line (such as in this case, where a loop is used).
I will look into this issue.
--
___
Python
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +5217
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32685>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
assignee: -> CuriousLearner
versions: +Python 3.8 -Python 3.7
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue8525>
___
___
Py
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hey Erin,
Can you please convert your patch to a PR on Github?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hey David,
I'm working on this issue. Will submit a PR in a while :)
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5849
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue3014>
___
___
Py
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5850
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Carol, Yes, I've raised a PR.
Currently, I've updated the docs for `str.isidentifier` clarifying the usage of
`keyword.iskeyword`
For updating the docstring of `keyword.iskeyword`, I saw that `Lib/Keyword.py`
defines this on line 55: `iskeyword =
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hey Jurjen,
Do you mind converting your patch in a Pull request please?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hi Haypo,
I'd like to work on a patch for this issue.
Can you please guide me how the tests are configured for buildbots?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4023
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31810>
___
___
Py
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hey, seems like this bug is not updated for a while. Can I work on this?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Thanks for the heads up! I'll do that ;)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21862>
___
___
Python-bugs-l
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +4259
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21862>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hey ncoghlan,
Does this issue makes sense to be worked on for Python 3.7?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Thanks a lot Antoine and Nick :)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21862>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Is this bug still valid or we can just close it?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue10
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +4325
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue16055>
___
___
Python-
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Sure, let me have a look at it and work on fix.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32028>
___
___
Python-bug
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +4496
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue22671>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +4582
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25910>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
New submission from Sanyam Khurana :
The current master branch at commit af5a895073c24637c094772b27526b94a12ec897
fails while building the interpreter.
The following is the traceback while running `make` after `./configure
--with-pydebug`
gcc -c -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
I used git bisect to track down the commit that broke the build.
Seems like this is the SHA: ebac19dad6263141d5db0a2c923efe049dba99d2
ebac19dad6263141d5db0a2c923efe049dba99d2 is the first bad commit
commit ebac19dad6263141d5db0a2c923efe049dba99d2
Author
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
I tried to resolve the issue by trying to figure out the syntax for the
SET_DECODE_ERROR macro.
I tried to call a function from the macro, and eventually do the checking in
that function.
Second way I tried was to replace statement for macro instead of
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Even a simple use of ternary operator instead of using if-else inside do-while
to handle the macro like:
#define SET_DECODE_ERROR(NAME, LEN) \
pymain->err = ((LEN) == (size_t)-2) \
? _Py_INIT_USER_ERR("cannot decode " #NAME) \
: _Py_I
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4601
stage: test needed -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Hey Victor, thanks for the update.
I was confused about how the macro was replaced in the previous version.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
I'll work on a fix for this and issue a PR.
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Nick,
I think the error messages are incorrect. We expect error message to be `takes
no argument` rather than `takes exactly one argument`. Can you please confirm
that?
I think for the class without any method overrides, the functionality should be
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +4643
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31506>
___
___
Python-
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Ezra, can you please convert your patch to a Pull Request on Github?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue15
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Leslie, would you like to work on a patch for this?
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19
Sanyam Khurana added the comment:
Serhiy, can you please elaborate on that a bit? I'll try to fix this.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Sanyam Khurana :
--
pull_requests: +4708
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue22671>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
