[issue40280] Consider supporting emscripten/webassembly as a build target

2021-11-26 Thread Roman Yurchak
Change by Roman Yurchak : -- nosy: +Roman Yurchak ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue40280> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue40280] Consider supporting emscripten/webassembly as a build target

2021-11-26 Thread Roman Yurchak
Roman Yurchak added the comment: Thanks a lot for working on this! > _sys_shutdown is the syscall for shutdown(2) used by the socket module. Yes, the issue with Emscripten is that a number of system calls are either not implemented or implemented but not tested. See a list we are using

[issue45898] ctypes cfield.c defines duplicate ffi_type_* symbols

2021-11-26 Thread Roman Yurchak
Change by Roman Yurchak : -- nosy: +Roman Yurchak ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45898> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue40029] test_importlib.test_zip requires zlib but not marked

2020-03-21 Thread Roman Yurchak
Change by Roman Yurchak : -- keywords: +patch nosy: +rth nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0 pull_requests: +18465 stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/19105 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.p

[issue41498] Undefinied _Py_Sigset_Converter function when HAVE_SIGSET_T not set

2020-08-06 Thread Roman Yurchak
New submission from Roman Yurchak : The `_Py_Sigset_Converter` function is conditionally defined in https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/777b611c8c5676b80898a429f71d28e59bddc49d/Modules/posixmodule.h#L27 if `ifdef HAVE_SIGSET_T` However this function is called unconditionally in https

[issue41498] Undefinied _Py_Sigset_Converter function when HAVE_SIGSET_T not set

2020-08-06 Thread Roman Yurchak
Change by Roman Yurchak : -- type: -> compile error ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue41498> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue35429] Incorrect use of raise NotImplemented

2018-12-06 Thread Roman Yurchak
New submission from Roman Yurchak : In two places in stdlib, `raise NotImplemented` is used instead of `raise NotImplementedError`. The former is not valid and produces, ``` >>> raise NotImplemented('message') Traceback (most recent call last): File "

[issue35429] Incorrect use of raise NotImplemented

2018-12-06 Thread Roman Yurchak
Change by Roman Yurchak : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +10237 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue35429> ___ ___ Py

[issue35430] Lib/argparse.py uses `is` for string comparison

2018-12-06 Thread Roman Yurchak
New submission from Roman Yurchak : Lib/argparse.py uses `is` for string comparison, ` 221:if self.heading is not SUPPRESS and self.heading is not None: 247:if text is not SUPPRESS and text is not None: 251:if usage is not SUPPRESS: 256:if action.help is not

[issue35430] Lib/argparse.py uses `is` for string comparison

2018-12-06 Thread Roman Yurchak
Change by Roman Yurchak : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +10241 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue35430> ___ ___ Py

[issue35430] Lib/argparse.py uses `is` for string comparison

2018-12-06 Thread Roman Yurchak
Roman Yurchak added the comment: Thanks, Alexey and Serhiy! Looking at the code more closely I would agree. I guess changing the value of the suppress object to something else to avoid the warning, has a potential of breaking code that relies on the current functionality and is not worth it

[issue35429] Incorrect use of raise NotImplemented

2018-12-06 Thread Roman Yurchak
Roman Yurchak added the comment: Resolved in https://bugs.python.org/issue33023 -- resolution: -> duplicate ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu