[issue26994] unexpected behavior for booleans in argparse

2016-05-10 Thread Nathan Naze
New submission from Nathan Naze: Setting a boolean type in argparse gives unexpected behavior when setting "True", "False", etc. https://gist.github.com/nanaze/db63e3f63e318408e3223bf1245d9752 Would have expected parsing to fail for unclear input that doesn't neatl

[issue26994] unexpected behavior for booleans in argparse

2016-05-10 Thread Nathan Naze
Nathan Naze added the comment: > It does 'bool(value)', and 'bool("False")' is True, since "False" is a > non-empty string. Yes, I understand this. It's fine to mark as "working as intended", but coming from other flag-parsing libr

[issue26994] unexpected behavior for booleans in argparse

2016-05-10 Thread Nathan Naze
Nathan Naze added the comment: I also buy the argument that changing the behavior now would be problematic given the existing usages in the wild. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue26