New submission from Matthäus Wander:
RFC4648 specifies two different alphabets for Base32: 1) the common one already
used in RFC3548 and implemented in Python, and 2) an "Extended Hex" alphabet
which is used by e.g. DNSSEC NSEC3 but not yet implemented in Python.
The attached patch
Matthäus Wander added the comment:
Added single patch as requested.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28772/py3_base32hex.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Matthäus Wander added the comment:
I've created a new patch that works against the current 3.5 sources. Should be
fine for 3.6, I guess.
Separate functions b32hexencode and b32hexdecode are used now. There is no
optional parameter "base32hex" anymore.
--
versions: +Pyt
Matthäus Wander added the comment:
*facepalm* Yes, I uploaded the old patch twice. Sorry for that.
- Added doc update.
- Added test case that includes all 32 characters codes.
I'm reusing the existing Base32 table generation logic without changes. It has
been changed (in 3.4 or so) sinc
