Matej Cepl added the comment:
Hmm, then I don’t care about this anymore. Solution which I won’t be able to
use for couple of years doesn’t make sense to me to struggle with it. If
anybody cares about python 3.5, feel free to reopen.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open ->
Matej Cepl added the comment:
OK, so perhaps developing of tests is not such complete waste of time. And yes,
I hoped that at least in terms of external API I wouldn´t introduce any change.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Well, basically any solution is better than nothing ;)
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1005
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> In my own case I use os.popen(“wget …”) instead of urllib2 just because some
> version long ago failed on some web site. I can trust that this external
> tool works all the time. It would be great if urllib2 worked as well
> nowadays.
I believe
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> Regardless of whether we add this to 2.7 or not, it should be an entirely
> separate class. I personally feel this isn't a bug fix but a feature addition
> for 2.7 so I'm -0.5 on adding it there. It's also not a security backport so
&
Changes by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14465>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7559>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.pyth
Changes by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5680>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.pyth
Changes by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23665>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
201 - 209 of 209 matches
Mail list logo