Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1322>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.pyth
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue28788>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Matej Cepl added the comment:
So, this bug report could be closed, right?
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue23159>
___
___
Pytho
Matej Cepl added the comment:
OK, Serhiy you have the point: it was just a good exercise for me, but the
benefit is doubtful. Could somebody close this ticket then?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue28
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33233>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue12735>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32771>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue13940>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue5305>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.pyth
Matej Cepl added the comment:
What about WONTFIX here? I completely agree with rhettinger: this is a waste of
time with potential for causing damage.
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue18
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Are you able to reproduce it with IMAP4.debug value set to 3 or more? Clean up
passwords etc. and paste the log here, please. Thank you.
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26
Matej Cepl added the comment:
ping?
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue18540>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Matej Cepl added the comment:
UTF-7 is tackled in https://bugs.python.org/issue5305
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Well, and would it be too much to refresh capabilities attribute in the end of
login method?
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue18
Matej Cepl added the comment:
I do agree with http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0476/#other-protocols:
This PEP only proposes requiring this level of validation for HTTP clients, not
for other protocols such as SMTP.
This is because while a high percentage of HTTPS servers have correct
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> Module imaplib has pretty sparse test code.
On that note: would anybody be willing to express in form of (simplified) test
case, what's the problem reported here? I am not sure, I follow.
--
___
Python
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Oh, this is 2.6 bug. This should be closed.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue5430>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
New submission from Matej Cepl :
I am in the process of writing script working with IMAP first time using Python
3 for it (unfortunately, most of servers where I run other code is so ancient
that even Python 2.7 is a stretch), and it is really nice experience so far.
Many problems which are
Matej Cepl added the comment:
See also issue 33327.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue28320>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Matej Cepl :
When running
box = IMAP4_SSL(host)
box.login(user, pass)
msgs = somehowget_uids_of_messsages_to_move()
box.uid('MOVE', msgs, 'target')
I get an error "Unknown IMAP4 UID command: MOVE". The problem is that imaplib
c
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +6266
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue6>
___
___
Python-
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue18153>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue5430>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.pyth
Matej Cepl added the comment:
The last patch (clear_buffer_on_error.patch) has still not been applied
(looking at 2.7 and master branches).
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue14
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30345>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue23395>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
pull_requests: +7384
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue23395>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
pull_requests: +7385
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue23395>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Matej Cepl added the comment:
I would add that Debian doesn't seem to fare that much better ...
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python3.7&arch=amd64&ver=3.7.0-1&stamp=1530136859&raw=0
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
P
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34008>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Hmm, what about version of gcc? I suspect some troubles could be caused by gcc
version 8 (we have in openSUSE), or LTO option switched on?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34
Matej Cepl added the comment:
It's somehow complicated, in the build chroot I can make tests run only with
LD_LIBRARY_PATH set to $(readlink -f Python-3.7.0) and PYTHONPATH to Lib
directory. However, then the set of failed tests changes. For example
test_runpy runs without problems
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Yes, it must be something in the chroot, because when run in the plain command
line, all tests as well on openSUSE Tumbleweed (with the latest updates).
393 tests OK.
1 test failed:
test_epoll
21 tests skipped:
test_ctypes test_devpoll test_idle
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> Are you testing with patches? It may be interesting to try to get these
> patches upstream:
Tested both and without patches, the same results. Everything in openSUSE is
done in open (rather strikingly similar to RH openness, although things are
eve
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue29708>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Matej Cepl :
Many Linux distribution (most of them) distinguish between library directory
/usr/lib for noarch or 32bit libraries and /usr/lib64. This patch (originally
from openSUSE) enables to capture this distinction.
--
components: Build
files: python-3.6.0
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
pull_requests: +7678
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34032>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
Matej Cepl added the comment:
>From https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-July/154273.html
(by Nick Coghlan):
In particular, if a build system sets SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH without
specifying a pyc format for py_compile or compileall, Python 3.7 will
give you checked hashes by defa
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34033>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Matej Cepl added the comment:
So, if this is a duplicate of #32007, shouldn't it be closed?
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Matej Cepl added the comment:
It seems to be even more weird. Even with installed libnsl-devel
(libnsl-devel-1.2.0-2.5.x86_64 on openSUSE/Tumbleweed) I get this in config.log:
checking for t_open in -lnsl... no
and truly, when grepping for t_open in /usr/include/rpc* I get nothing
Matej Cepl added the comment:
It seems to be even more weird. Even with installed libnsl-devel
(libnsl-devel-1.2.0-2.5.x86_64 on openSUSE/Tumbleweed) I get this in config.log:
checking for t_open in -lnsl... no
and truly, when grepping for t_open in /usr/include/rpc* I get nothing. When
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> Matej is this about Python 2?
I am currently ONLY on building python 3.7.0, nothing else bothers me at the
moment.
Let me summarize my findings, or what I think is the situation (of course, I
could be completely wrong):
* See
https://build.opensuse.
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> - I agree with Benjamin, let's deprecate the NIS module. NIS/YP functionality
> has been replaced by NSS a long time ago.
Agree. a) who will separate its functionality into separate module for PyPI, b)
who start a thread on p
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> On Fedora after the fix we had also to BuildRequire libnsl2-devel and
> libtirpc-devel after the glibc change was implemented for the correct headers
> to be included within the buildroot.
libnsl-devel requires libtirpc-devel here, so that isn
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.6, Python 3.7
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue6>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> This is superceded by:
>
> http://bugs.python.org/issue18906
Then it should be closed, right?
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
pull_requests: +7904
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue6>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
pull_requests: +7906
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue6>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
pull_requests: +7916
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue6>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26171>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33255>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
versions: +Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue23847>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue14465>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
pull_requests: +8405
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue14465>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> I suggest to:
>
> * close bpo-17318 as a duplicate of this issue (bpo-17239)
> * close bpo-24238
> * close this issue
+1 from me.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.pyt
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Guys, really, don't we have anything better to do with your time than this
silliness?
Even if the terminology would be used in the strictest and most brutal meaning,
i.e., slave must mindlessly follow orders of its master, there is nothing of
approval o
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: -mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34605>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue12733>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30717>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26852>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34726>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Matej Cepl added the comment:
It seems to me that this adds escape4chm as unconditional dependency on all
platforms. Which seems like a bad idea to me, I don't think users on Linux or
Mac OS X are that keen on *.chm files.
I think this change broke my build of python3-doc packa
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Sorry, my mistake, it seems I was using python2 Sphinx even for building
python3 documentation, which is a bad idea, I guess.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32
Matej Cepl added the comment:
On 19.5.2012 12:25, Petri Lehtinen wrote:
> Against which branch or Python version your patch is? It doesn't
> apply cleanly on any branch (and yes, I changed the target filename
> to .gitignore first).
It used to be master, but probably some ti
Changes by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15873>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pyth
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Is this the same as when tests with python-3.3.2 fails on me with RHEL-6?
test_locale (test.test_format.FormatTest) ... ERROR
test_non_ascii (test.test_format.FormatTest) ... test test_format failed
'\u20ac=%f' % (1.0,) =? '\u20ac=1.000
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Hmm, so with this patch
diff -up Python-3.3.2/Lib/test/test_format.py.fixFormatTest
Python-3.3.2/Lib/test/test_format.py
--- Python-3.3.2/Lib/test/test_format.py.fixFormatTest 2013-10-22
10:05:12.253426746 +0200
+++ Python-3.3.2/Lib/test/test_format.py
Matej Cepl added the comment:
To #200912: now, system locale is UTF-8 all the way:
santiago:python3 (el6) $ locale
LANG=en_US.utf8
LC_CTYPE="en_US.utf8"
LC_NUMERIC=en_IE.utf8
LC_TIME=en_IE.utf8
LC_COLLATE="en_US.utf8"
LC_MONETARY=en_IE.utf8
LC_MESSAGES="en_US.utf8&quo
Matej Cepl added the comment:
>>> import locale
>>> locale.localeconv()
{'p_cs_precedes': 127, 'n_sep_by_space': 127, 'n_sign_posn': 127,
'n_cs_precedes': 127, 'grouping': [], 'positive_sign': ''
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Perhaps version of glibc might be interesting as well?
glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
Matej Cepl added the comment:
What I did:
1) run the build (it is a building of Fedora Rawhide python3 package on RHEL),
and see it failed in this test.
2) see below
santiago:python3 (el6) $ cd Python-3.3.2/build/optimized/
santiago:optimized (el6) $ ./python -m test test_format
[1/1
New submission from Matej Cepl:
With pure clone of https://github.com/python/cpython.git (no patches applied
whatsoever, and the last commit is
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/650406fe7373f31b595b381d4f2f02065607386a)
and pure
./configure && make -j2 && make -j
Matej Cepl added the comment:
On 22/10/13 17:32, Stefan Krah wrote:
> It looks like some other test in the test suite did not restore a changed
> locale. If you're motivated enough, you could try if it still happens in
> 3.4 and open a new issue (it's unrelated to thi
Matej Cepl added the comment:
On 22/10/13 20:43, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Christian Heimes added the comment:
>
> What's the output of "uname -r" on your machine?
2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.i686
--
___
Python tracker
<http:/
New submission from Matej Cepl:
GitHub API v3 is intentionally broken (see
http://developer.github.com/v3/auth/):
> The main difference is that the RFC requires unauthenticated requests to be
> answered with 401 Unauthorized responses. In many places, this would disclose
> the exi
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Also let me add from RFC 2617, end of section 2:
> A client MAY preemptively send the corresponding Authorization
> header with requests for resources in that space without
> receipt of another challenge from the server. Similarly, when
> a client sen
Changes by Matej Cepl :
--
nosy: +mcepl
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19279>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Matej Cepl added the comment:
I am trying to work on fixing issue 19494 (HTTPBasicAuthHandler doesn't work
with Github and other websites which require prior Authorization header in the
first request).
I have created this testing script calling GitHub v3 API using new
“authentic
New submission from Matej Cepl:
looking at
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/543c76769c14/Lib/http/client.py#l847
(logging in HTTPConnection.send method; but this code has been same since like
forever) I see that the HTTP request is NOT pretty printed:
if self.debuglevel >
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Whole package with tests has been uploaded to PyPI as
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/urllib2_prior_auth/
The code for this module is on
http://luther.ceplovi.cz/git/python-http_basic_auth.git/
--
___
Python tracker
Matej Cepl added the comment:
I meant, please comment on the code.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19494>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Well, I hoped to get first some comments on the code itself (and especially the
test).
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Matej Cepl added the comment:
This is a patch with tests working for the tip of cpython.
--
hgrepos: +267
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36343/fix-issue19494-py35.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Changes by Matej Cepl :
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19494>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Matej Cepl :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36344/fix-issue19494-py27.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19494>
___
___
Python-bug
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Mercurial seems to be incredibly slow to clone, for anybody who is willing to
deal with git, my real repo is http://luther.ceplovi.cz/git/cpython.git/
(branches basicAuth19494 and basicAuth19494_py3k).
--
___
Python
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> This patch looks like a feature addition rather than the discussed
> optimization of always sending auth on the first request. As such it could
> only go into 3.5.
??? I was trying hard not to break current API, so I have created a new handler
to
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> But that introduces a new element of the API, which is an API change. I
> thought the plan was to change the existing code to always send the auth when
> it was available.
Well, it seems to me a little bit suspicious that with changing the current
Changes by Matej Cepl :
--
hgrepos: +268
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19494>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Which are all reasons why I believe more conservative approach (i.e., new
separate handler) is better.
It seems to be a little more silly to have 21 lines long module separately in
PyPI for 2.7, but whatever
Matej Cepl added the comment:
> The patch for Python 3.5, however, looks great.
So, could we get some resolution here, please? Before this bug celebrates a
first birthday, could somebody decide what to do? Whom should I pester? Who has
the responsibility to make a decis
Matej Cepl added the comment:
New version of the HTTPBasicPriorAuthHandler patch
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file36595/0001-Alternative-handler-adding-Authorization-header-even.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Matej Cepl added the comment:
BTW, should I add anything for https://docs.python.org/3.5/whatsnew/3.5.html ?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Matej Cepl added the comment:
ping? Could I ask for a review of the refreshed patch, please?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19494>
___
___
Matej Cepl added the comment:
This is the suggested patch for this issue. Just adding new http_request method
of HTTPBasicAuthHandler which adds Authorization header to the initial request.
Patch is now just for python 2.7, but it may be trivially ported to any other
version of Python as it
Changes by Matej Cepl :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file32835/test_create_1.py
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19494>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Matej Cepl added the comment:
Concerning the compatibility with py3k. Yes, of course, I know that py2k is not
compatible, but see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/145473 ...
I guess the main idea (http_request method overriding) is the same and it could
be ported to py3k more
Matej Cepl added the comment:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:14:16PM +, Chris Angelico wrote:
>I suspect, though, that this will be called a feature addition,
>ergo it won't go into 2.7 (and for 3.x, will be deferred until
>3.5). I would advise working with the current 3.x branc
Matej Cepl added the comment:
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 16:52 +, Terry J. Reedy wrote:
> Both patches have an unusual email section at the top that is not
> needed for this tracker, and which I have not seen here before. Is this
> something idiosyncratic to git?
Yes, it is output of g
101 - 200 of 209 matches
Mail list logo