Mark Lawrence added the comment:
In msg126496 MVL says "I'll also point out that this is not a bug: copying over
an installation is not supposed to work" so can we close this as "not a bug"?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.golden
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Has this issue been overtaken by events?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could this now be implemented in the turtle module?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, terry.reedy
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Does anyone wish to take this forward, is it simply dead in the water or what?
You might like to note that msg111963 refers to #812369 which was superseded by
#18214 which was fixed in 3.4.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still a problem? Normally I'd be perfectly happy to try something on
Windows but the mere mention of distutils sends shivers down my spine :(
--
components: +Windows
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, dstufft, eric.araujo
versions: +Python 3.4, Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Daniel could you supply a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8041>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch is a one line addition to fficonfig.py.in, could someone glance at it
please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Thomas can you provide a patch for this issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle reminder guys.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch simply adds backticks markup around load_tests.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3, Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm not sure what machine I'm meant to be looking at but is this still a
problem one year on?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
At this stage is this something that we'd want to back port or fix in 2.7 or
would a doc change suffice?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Xavier can you provide a patch for this issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch is a one line change to distutils/command/build_ext.py. Can we have
the stage set and a patch review done please, distutils is black magic to me.
--
components: +Distutils
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, dstufft, eric.araujo
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Terry can you pick this one up?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
PEP 227 (Not 277 as wrongly quoted in one place) is about Statically Nested
Scopes. There are several XXX place holders in the current doc. For all I
know it would be possible to simply remove all of them, but who is best placed
to give a definitive answer
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
With Stage "resolved" and Resolution "duplicate" surely this can be closed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
#10382 has been closed in favour of #2382.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10384>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this out of date as the only buildbot I could find is running OpenBSD 5.5?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@jwishnie can you provide a patch for this, as without it the issue goes
nowhere?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Slipped under the radar guys?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Serhiy can you take a look at this as I recall you've been doing some regex
work?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, serhiy.storchaka
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.py
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Surely this can't be a problem nearly four years on?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still a problem? How do I go about reproducing it, assuming that I can
on Windows?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I think this should be an enhancement request. Regardless it goes nowhere
without a patch, anybody?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: behavior -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
&l
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@David one for your TODO list or does this rightfully belong with somebody else?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've no idea whether or not the patches are still valid after all this time.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, jcea
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.py
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Peter could you provide a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Eric can you provide a doc patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Santiago can you provide a patch for this issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Ronny can you provide a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +eli.bendersky, scoder
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +alanmcintyre, serhiy.storchaka
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Matthias can you provide a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Matthias can you provide a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17780>
___
___
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
type: -> compile error
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11598>
___
_
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Ned can you provide a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The original function names are still listed and the wide versions have been
added to the docs so this can be closed as "out of date".
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle reminder guys.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch only changes six lines. At a quick glance it seems fine to me so can
we have a formal review please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone respond to this please as I know nothing about CentOS builds.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19402>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch is a one line change, can we have a commit review please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
A quick glance says the patch is okay so can we have a commit review please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can a linux guru comment on this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch changes four lines in Modules/_ctypes/libffi/configure.ac which means
nothing to me, can someone review it please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Eric what is your opinion on this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone please confirm that my assessment of this as an enhancement is
correct, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: behavior -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
&l
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Who is best placed to look at this as nobody is listed on the experts index?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we or can't we remove the check as Eric has proposed in msg201874?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Sorry I've no idea whether this should be set to enhancement request, behaviour
or what.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Stefan can you provide a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
If this is referring to the box on docs.python.org shouldn't this be logged
elsewhere?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle reminder guys.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Yury do you agree with this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, yselivanov
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19472>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Ned just a reminder as I see you've been talking tcl/tk on c.l.py earlier
today.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
How do we take this forward, also considering #12939, #21859 and #14243 and
possibly others?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As #13247 has been closed "not a bug" and #16656 "won't fix" shouldn't this be
done sooner rather than later?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This is one of several Windows file related issues, see also #12939, #21859,
#15244 and possibly others. How can we take this forward? If it's of any use I
can help with testing as I've a new Windows 8.1 HP laptop with 8G of memory.
-
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Terry can you comment on Westley's patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
There's a two line patch inline in msg201750. If it's acceptable I'll do a
formal patch myself unless someone else wants to pick this up.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just to note that this is referenced from #19453 pydoc and ironpython.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle prod in the ribs guys.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Still a problem or out of date?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19482>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Anybody volunteering but please don't look at me :)
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch just adds the version added tag to urllib2.rst. Can someone commit
this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Philip could you provide a reference to (say) discussions on python-dev for
lesser mortals such as myself?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone answer Christian's question please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can confirm that this problem still exists so can someone take a look please,
thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is there any work still needed here? Surely the 2.6.x patches can't be applied
unless there are security issues?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Slipped under the radar? Note the patch suggested in msg184958.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Has there been any discussion regarding this elsewhere or is this as far as
we've got?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Richard have you had any thoughts about this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
A one line change is given in msg189992 so is this correct or isn't it?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, meador.inge
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Ram Rachum can you provide a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle reminder.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Slipped under the radar?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18119>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Jakub does this apply to all Python versions and OSes?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, loewis
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This won't go anywhere until a patch is provided on #19904 as requested in
msg205765.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.3, Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a reminder that a patch review is needed here guys.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we please have a response to the question put in msg218050 so we can
investigate?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm concerned that 3.5 is creeping ever closer and I wouldn't like to see work
done on the installer backed out at the 11th hour because there has been no
agreement here. Does this need a discussion on python-dev? For that matter
has there been o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Pardon me for breathing. As you clearly don't like the way I work would you be
so kind as to reopen the issues that I've helped close in the last few months.
It might bugger the stats on the bug tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
What's the verdict on this guys?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can this be closed as "won't fix" or what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a decision as to whether or not the patch should be back ported to
2.7.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I have never had a problem building ssl with vs2010 express so can this be
closed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Terry what is your take on this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, terry.reedy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As there has been no response can this be closed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm assuming that this can now be closed.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Should this be closed as I'm not aware of any similar problems with 2.7,
particularly when this addresses 2.7.3.rc3?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we close this as I cannot see how a test failure against a 6.5 year old
alpha build can still be relevant?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
mmarkk we're sorry about the delay in getting back to you. Who is best placed
to reply to this enhancement request, the only name on the experts list is
inactive?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 3.3, Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Shane, there are major differences between the makefile docs versions 2 and 3,
so could you prepare a patch for this addressed at version 2 only?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle reminder guys.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle reminder guys.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle reminder guys.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm uncertain as to whether or not the patch can be considered stand alone, or
whether the pep3121 keyword is also relevant here.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle reminder guys.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could we have a reply to this from our ctypes experts, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
1901 - 2000 of 3464 matches
Mail list logo