Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Where do we stand with this and #14945 ?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Where do we stand with this and #11260 ?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Raymond what is your opinion on this proposal?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Terry is this something you can comment on please?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, terry.reedy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Terry just a reminder for yourself and your band of merry men and women.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Any volunteers to document what appears to be a relatively obscure function :)
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've no idea what having a file called __main__.py is likely to do so can
someone comment please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a patch review please, I'm not touching C code at that level within
Python. Are people happy with the concept of moving code from main.c to
pythonrun.c ?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've looked at managers.py and can't see any evidence that the sockets are ever
closed. Please check this out as I can't believe that a technical problem like
this could have been around for so long without someone else spotting it during
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Zach can you do a patch review on this as it's holding up #13837 ?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a patch review on this please as it's holding up #13837.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've asked for patch reviews on #9949 and #15411.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As the patch is short can we have a commit review please. Can we also close
issue 18392 as a duplicate of this.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch LGTM at a quick glance so can we have a formal review please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
It appears, especially from the later messages, that this is not wanted.
However noting msg170616 should we close this with #10967 to supersede it?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Denver are you still interested in working on this as a week or two has
passed? :)
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Are these sporadic failures still happening? I've glanced over the logs and
only found failures due to recent code changes.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have this followed up please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, paul.j3
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle reminder.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
My reading of msg166737 is that the type should be behaviour. The patch is
only five lines of actual code so can we have a review please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Pyt
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've confirmed that the behaviour is identical in 3.4.1 on Windows.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, jnoller, sbt
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Siona sorry about the delay in getting back to you. Can someone try this
please as I've only got Windows.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle reminder.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Guys I asked on IRC and was advised to add you to the nosy list to see if you
can help out on this. Please be aware that there are plenty more where this
came from.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, loewis, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
versions: +Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just curiosity why such a name change?
--
components: +Tests
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
title: create_autospec -> unittest mock create_autospec doesn't correctly
replace mocksignature
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.4,
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Stefan could you provide a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Florian can you provide a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python
3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
&l
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Baptiste can you provide a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17286>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Aivars sorry about the delay in getting back to you.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, David.Edelsohn
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm sorry but this site is for reporting bugs on Python itself, not on third
party packages.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone comment on this please as I haven't got a clue, sorry :(
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a formal review on the latest patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: enhancement -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
>From the 3.5 docs.
io.open(file, mode='r', buffering=-1, encoding=None, errors=None, newline=None,
closefd=True, opener=None)
This is an alias for the builtin open() function.
There is a description for closefd at the open() function link.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/fastcache/0.4.0 also seems relevant.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/fastcache/0.4.0 also seems relevant.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
components: -Distutils2
nosy: +dstufft
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue818
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue644744>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The output now is
c:\Users\Mark\PythonIssues>cgitbbug.py getattr1
3.4.1 (v3.4.1:c0e311e010fc, May 18 2014, 10:38:22) [MSC v.1600 32 bit (Intel)]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Users\Mark\PythonIssues\cgitbbug.py", line 34, in
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Given the comments in msg126979 do we formally review this, close as "won't
fix" or what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyt
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Does this render the patch against build_pgo.bat on #17667 obsolete?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
See also #21907.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17667>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I don't understand this at all, but if this is a Sphinx bug shouldn't it be
reported on the appropriate bug tracker and not here?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I also find the location annoying and would be happy to see it moved.
Regarding the "extra long build time on the buildbots due to having to
recompile Tcl/Tk and OpenSSL" is this a one off the first time you run after
the commit, or does it alw
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
>From what I can see the code is completely the same in default but does this
>matter or not? As a matter of interest is there an official policy regarding
>code clones, whether in C or pure Python?
--
nosy: +Br
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch is very short so can we have a formal review please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The chain of dependencies goes from here to #15403, #18576 and back here. How
do we break this loop?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3, Python 3.4
___
Python trac
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Changes were made to this module on #20555.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17665>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm getting lost in all the enhancement requests for tests. How does this
relate to e.g. 16748 or 10572?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +David.Edelsohn
type: -> crash
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The latest patch reflects msg112886 and msg149117 so I believe it should be
committed.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +Lita.Cho
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1702036>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'd like to see this in 3.5 as I often use sqlite so what needs doing here?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
David is listed against AIX on the experts list
https://docs.python.org/devguide/experts.html. That alone suggests to me that
AIX is an officially supported platform.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@David what is your opinion on this issue?
--
nosy: +David.Edelsohn
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5718>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just flagging this up as testing is rather important.
--
components: +Tests
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2091>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Both of these tests are still commented out in the default branch.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is Solaris 9 supported as I can't find any buildbots for it?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, jcea
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Only one Solaris box was online when I looked and that had passed ctypes tests,
but surely this will have been sorted out by now?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Clearly the long term solution is to fix the problems in the cpython code
referenced in msg205227, but in the short term is it worth attempting a work
around as suggested in msg205131 ?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I suppose that technically this can only go into 3.5, but is there any real
reason that this couldn't be backported?
--
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36141/Issue19980
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can our testing gurus shed any light on this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, pitrou
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we get this into 3.5 for the reasons given in msg179596 ?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this ever likely to be implemented or is it more likely to be rejected owing
to the reasons given in msg75587 ?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Looking at msg128306 and msg128319 I believe this can be closed.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@David (Edelsohn) what is your take on this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, David.Edelsohn
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have the opinions of our testing experts please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, pitrou
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3, Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This works perfectly on 64 bit Windows 8.1 for 3.4.1 and 3.5.0a0.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
It states in msg136119 that this is already fixed and I've confirmed this in
3.4.1 and 3.5.0a0 so believe this can be closed.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
components: -Distutils2, Windows
nosy: +dstufft
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -3rd party, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8170>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
PEP 418 states "time.monotonic(): timeout and scheduling, not affected by
system clock updates" and has also deprecated time.clock() so I believe this
can be closed as "out of date".
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
__
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
How does the new pathlib module handle this? Also note from the docs for
os.samefile() "Changed in version 3.4: Windows now uses the same implementation
as all other platforms.".
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower,
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Stage needs setting to "patch review", any volunteers to undertake a review?
--
components: +Cross-Build -Extension Modules, Windows
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, jlt63
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1,
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
main.c has this.
#if defined(MS_WINDOWS) || defined(__CYGWIN__)
#include
#ifdef HAVE_FCNTL_H
#include
#define PATH_MAX MAXPATHLEN
#endif
#endif
Wouldn't inserting #else before #define fix this issue?
--
components: +Build -Installation, Windows
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
components: +Windows
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8548>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can you please retest with Python 2.7.8 as this has an updated version of
openssl.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can't reproduce this with 64 bit Windows 8.1 using 3.4.1 or 3.5.0a0, I don't
have 2.7 to test on.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
___
Pyth
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I have no intention of finding out what is in the 48 attached html files :(
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Alexander apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Who is best placed
to look at this issue, I'll admit to knowing squat about cgi?
--
components: +Library (Lib)
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I don't see how we can do anything with this as mingw is unsupported. If any
docs need changing wouldn't that best be done as a completely separate issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python trac
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
msg185039 from #4969 also complains about this issue. I agree with the
solution put forward in the last sentence of msg172531. If we think this is the
best idea I'll work on a patch unless anybody else wants to pick this up.
--
nosy: +Breamo
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Christoph please raise a new issue regarding the problem you describe in
msg219788.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Christoph sorry #21652 has already been raised to address the problem of mixed
str and unicode objects.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Ben you're correct. The other issues have been addressed in #10162 and #9291
so I believe this can be closed. One 2.7 regression regarding mixed str and
unicode objects is addressed in #21652.
--
___
P
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Should we create the scripts dir during install? Is it that big a deal?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, zach.ware
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Works fine for me on Windows 8.1 64 bit using 3.4.1 and 3.5.0a0. Can one on
our Windows gurus confirm this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I suggest we close this as "won't fix" since I don't see how we can justify
spending time working around a known limitation of Windows.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
components: -Distutils2
nosy: +dstufft
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -3rd party, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could somebody respond to the originator please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
components: -Distutils2
nosy: +dstufft
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -3rd party, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Of the two issues mentioned in msg179485 #4508 is still open but #13765 has
been closed "not a bug".
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
components: -Distutils2
nosy: +dstufft
versions: +Python 3.5 -3rd party, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
According to http://matthew-brett.github.io/pydagogue/python_msvc.html Python
3.3 has always been compiled with 2010 on Windows so I think this can be closed
as "user sorted it out for him/herself" :)
--
nosy: +B
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
PEP 446 supersedes PEP 433.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Who is best placed to look at this, there's nobody active on the experts list
for subprocess?
--
components: +Library (Lib) -Interpreter Core
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a gentle reminder.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14105>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14111>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've tried to make the title more meaningful, feel free to change it if you can
think of something better.
--
components: +Interpreter Core
nosy: +tim.golden, zach.ware
title: coding bug remains in 3.3.5rc2 -> SyntaxError: encoding problem:
is
1701 - 1800 of 3464 matches
Mail list logo