Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Accidentally set to pending?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I think this was meant to be closed rather than moved to pending see msg210788.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Accidentally set to pending?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Presumably this can be closed as fixed.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
ntpath.join() was fixed in issue19456 so I think all we need here is a commit
review of the attached documentation patch.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've asked for a commit review on issue 15414 so can we close this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch is against test_file2k.py which I can't find in my default cpython
setup. If this was removed from (say) Python 3.0 how do I check for that?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I agree with the sentiment expressed in msg218513 and would close this as "out
of date".
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: pending -> open
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyth
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
msg81942 states "structmember.h lacks a 'T_SIZET' define in order to properly
support struct fields of type 'size_t' within PyMemberDef." As we have
managed without this feature for the last five years do we really nee
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I believe this is still valid in which case could we have the stage and
resolution fields set appropriately please. You might also like to take a look
at issue 13238 which is referred to by issue 7839.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can confirm that this works fine with 3.4.1 and 3.5.0a0. I don't run 2.7 any
more so I don't know if this is fixed in later versions.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.6, Python 3.1
___
Pyth
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +steve.dower, zach.ware
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still relevant or has it been overtaken by other work from Zach or
Steve?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Pekka sorry about the delay in getting back to you.
I can confirm that this is still in issue in 3.4.1 and 3.5.0a0.
--
components: +Library (Lib)
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Jason I'm very sorry about the delay in getting back to you.
Can our Windows gurus shed any light on this one?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.4, Py
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Robert can we have a response to Victor's question please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Glenn can you provide a formal patch so we can take this forward?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can our Windows gurus advise on this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20117>
___
___
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +jlt63, stutzbach
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7405>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Steve/Zach just FYI
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, zach.ware
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Zach can you add anything to this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, zach.ware
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This can be closed as "out of date" as extensive changes made to the Windows
FAQ have removed the wording referenced in the patch.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just a reminder that there are comments on Rietveld.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I think a message as suggested in msg187571 would be more than adequate.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Using latest default.
c:\cpython\PCbuild>python_d -c "import os; os.fdopen(2)"
-c:1: ResourceWarning: unclosed file <_io.TextIOWrapper name=2 mode='r'
encoding='cp1252'>
Do we need to do anything with 2.7, can t
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I believe this should be closed as the patch refers to various win32xxx imports
that no longer exists in subprocess.py.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1175
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Please note the work being performed on #1191964 which was first referenced in
msg54591.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1260
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@hct I'm very sorry about the delay in getting back to you. The reported
bevaviour is the same with 3.4.1 and 3.5.0a0 on Windows 7.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
P
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The example code works fine using 3.4.1 and 3.5.0a0 on Windows 7.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, paul.j3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Thorsten sorry about the delay involved here.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, paul.j3
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Dougal sorry about the delay in getting back to you.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, paul.j3
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
All cbytes tests passed after the change was made but I've no idea as to the
impact of this.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35940/Issue16376
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
My understanding is that we can't use the patches as the originator has never
signed the CLA. Am I correct or does this only apply to code, or what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.py
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Michiel I'm sorry about the delay in replying to you. I can confirm the same
behaviour in 3.4.1 on 3.5.0a0 on Windows 7.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, christian.heimes
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm assuming that this should be treated as an enhancement request.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm assuming that this is still an issue. I've not tested it myself as I've
never understood why python gets put in "Program Files" so I don't have such a
setup and won't be creating one.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBo
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is XP under Python support now? I'm sure I've read that it isn't but can't
find a reference.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Any thoughts from our Windows gurus?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Anything else to do here, noting the references to #21059 and #20035 ? Great
work by the way, things on Windows are far cleaner than they were just a few
months ago.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I believe the patch on #1576120 is related to this but it was never reviewed.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Facundo please accept our apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, meador.inge
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Matt I'm sorry that we haven't got back to you on this.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, christian.heimes
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Gregory do you intend to follow up on this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2698>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As nobody has even commented on this, let alone proposed a patch, I'd be
inclined to close as "won't fix" or "out of date".
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@wchlm sorry about the delay in responding, but would you like to propose a
patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Slipped under the radar?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17250>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Dominique please accept our apologies for the delay in replying. Can someone
please review the attached patch as it's only five extra lines. I'd do it
myself but I know nothing about openSUSE, internationalization or gettext.
--
nosy: +B
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
#7951 has an interesting debate on negative indexes that is possibly applicable
here.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Nothing has been done with #17605 or the associated issues to my knowledge.
I've no idea as to whether or not the originator will be picking them up again
or if he is open to another user picking them up. I do know that there are 56
open issues with min
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll provide a patch but I don't know which test file to use, can somebody
please advise.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, meador.inge
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Joachim I'm sorry about the delay in replying to you. Can someone take a look
at this please as it's out of my league.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
FTR PEP 419 has been deferred as there's no champion.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Kaarle please accept our apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Can
one of our unicode gurus comment please.
--
components: +Unicode
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, ezio.melotti, lemburg, loewis
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Slipped under the radar?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16185>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@emeaudroid please accept our apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
Can someone take a look at this please as I don't have a *nix box to play with.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Joseph please accept our apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, alexandre.vassalotti, pitrou
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Who is best placed to produce a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Andrew we're sorry about the delay in getting back to you. @Senthil can you
comment on this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.py
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm assuming that this still needs doing.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Eric could you comment on this please.
--
components: -Distutils2
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, dstufft
versions: -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Yuval sorry about the delay in replying. Can a *nix person comment on this
please as I stick with Windows.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@r3m0t we're sorry about the delay in getting back to you. Could you write a
patch that covers this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Lars can we have a comment on this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Terry one that appears to have escaped your eagle eye :)
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, terry.reedy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm assuming that this classifies as an enhancement and that the whole world
ought to be interested in regrtest.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracke
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
There are a pile of mingw enhancement requests with this and
#18653, #18654 and #19245 being meta issues. What is the official status of
mingw within Python? Is the originator of these issues solely responsible for
taking them forward?
--
nosy
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can our OSX gurus comment on this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, ned.deily
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can't reproduce this with 3.4.1 or 3.5.0a0. I don't have a 2.7.x to test on,
can it still be reproduced with later versions of 2.7? Does the introduction
of pylauncher impact all on this wrt registry keys?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, s
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
With 3.4.1 and similarly with 3.5.0a0 I get
Testing python 3.4
C:\python34\python.exe: can't open file 'attributeError.py': [Errno 2] No such
file or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Users\Mark\MyPython\mytest.py"
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The attached patch is short and sweet and looks okay to my untrained eye. I
believe it should apply cleanly as there've been very few changes to _msi.c.
Can we have a formal patch review please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.g
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Tim can you pick this up?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm not sure how we take this forward as the code was changed via #11750, can
somebody please advise.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
There is no way that I'm commenting on the patch as it's against pyconfig.h,
what do our experts think of this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6
___
Python trac
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Senthil what if anything can we do with this issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +paul.j3
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13023>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Jonas do you wish to follow up on this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, paul.j3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Paul what is your take on this, other opinions seem positive?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, paul.j3
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Works fine for me.
Python build: 3.4.1 (v3.4.1:c0e311e010fc, May 18 2014, 10:38:22) [MSC v.1600 32
bit (Intel)]
Path 'C:\Windows\system32' exists in $PATH: True
File 'C:\Windows\system32\acledit.dll' exists: True
ctypes says for '
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Robert we're sorry about the delay in getting back to you. Sorry Windows
gurus this is over my head :(
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.py
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Apparently #13923 is related to this.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12806>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +paul.j3
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13923>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Knowing the platform this occurred on would be useful, but given the age do we
care?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Consider yourself reminded :)
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Paul the attached patch is extremely simple and follows the work on #13609.
Is it okay with you if the patch was committed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, paul.j3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
#11076 was closed as a duplicate of #8982 which was closed as fixed so can this
also be closed as a duplicate?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone follow this up noting it refers to #15903.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Please note this is also referred to from #15994.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a response to this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, benjamin.peterson
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Senthil do you still intend to run with this or could somebody else pick it up?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Nosy list set according to experts page.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, georg.brandl
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Paul what is your opinion of this documentation patch?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, paul.j3
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm not particularly interested in 2.7 documentation but is there anybody out
there who could review this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Daniel could you provide a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16509>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is it possible to backport the fix from #10845 to 2.7? Is it actually worth
doing?
--
components: +Library (Lib)
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
At a quick glance the patch looks okay to me so as there's been a lot of
positive comments can we have a formal patch review please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Presumably the responsibility for this lies with the person who made the
changes for #4074 ?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
How do we stand with eight outstanding issues here?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a review of the one line patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Should this have the same nosy list as #11016 ?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
1601 - 1700 of 3464 matches
Mail list logo