Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a review on this fairly small patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch adds 'system' to _supported_dists in platform.py. I've no idea
whether or not this is acceptable.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: behavior -> enhancement
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can this be closed as the code from rev. 54343 is live on Python 3.3. See also
Issue6426.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1605
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Are the tests for HTTPAuthDigest still outstanding?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I think this should be closed as slice.indices behaves exactly as I expect it
to, and the returned values are for any sequence and not just range().
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could someone please review this with a view to getting the patch into the 3.4
code base, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1100
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Presumably the implementation of PEP 409 on issue 6210 can be used to fix this
problem.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Please find attached a new file with the copyright notice removed. Would
someone like to review it please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27875/fix_reload.py
___
Python tracker
<h
New submission from Mark Lawrence:
Both Python 2 and 3 docs refer to Raymond Hettinger's original recipe here
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/576693/. Would it be better to link to
pypi https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ordereddict?
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Document
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I suggest that there is a zero chance of this being actioned unless the OP
wants to do all of the work and attach all of the required patches to this
issue.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This strikes me as a rather unusual case. How about discuss it on python-dev,
come to an agreement and document the process for this type of issue somewhere
for future reference? Or is that simply OTT?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
If it ain't broke don't fix it.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19499>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
How can you rant about something "won't get fixed" when it's an enhancement
request? If it's that important and/or so simple the OP or anyone else for
that matter can provide a patch, including tests and doc changes. Given that
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could they be documented with a massive warning in red "Cpython implementation
detail - subject to change without notice"? Or documented in a place that is
only accessible to developers and not users? Or...???
--
nosy: +B
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Are we at beta for 3.5 already? :)
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19655>
___
___
Python-bug
New submission from Mark Lawrence:
On the PEP index 397 is listed under the section "Accepted PEPs (accepted; may
not be implemented yet)". I believe it should be moved to Finished PEPs (done,
implemented in code repository).
--
messages: 204227
nosy: BreamoreBoy
priori
New submission from Mark Lawrence:
http://docs.python.org/3/using/windows.html#compiling-python-on-windows still
refers to Visual Studio 97 but there's no mention of 2010. Can we have this
updated please?
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 204844
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As a Windows user myself I'd say close it as it's been the better part of four
years since there was a comment here.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is there anything to backport as referred to in msg136670 or can this be closed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can somebody reset the status to open please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, zach.ware
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I cannot see a fix that would keep everybody happy. Also allow for potential
backward compatibility issues. Given that there are at least two if not more
suggested workarounds I'm inclined to close as "wont fix".
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I don't think there's anything to do here so can it be closed? If anything
else needs discussing surely it can go to python-ideas, python-dev or a new
issue as appropriate.
--
___
Python trac
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20880>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscrib
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can reproduce this with 3.4.1 and 3.5.0.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20844>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can somebody set the stage to patch review and give my patch the once over
please, thanks.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@David this is now out of date?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6462>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Lars can we have a response on this issue please?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
To me the patched code in readwrite seems cut and paste. Could it be written
something like this?
have_fileno = not map or obj._fileno in map
if have_fileno and flags & select.POLLIN:
obj.handle_read_event()
if have_fileno and flags & select
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is there a good reason for this being set to third party when it was raised
against Python 2.7rc1? Is it still a problem with the 2.7 series or any of the
3.x series?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could somebody review the patch please as it's well over my head.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Steve/Zach any interest in this one?
--
nosy: +steve.dower, zach.ware
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Steve/Zach FYI.
--
nosy: +steve.dower, zach.ware
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9194>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone do a patch review please, it's way over my head, and set the stage
and versions as appropriate.
--
nosy: +steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Petri/Illirgway could one of you produce a new patch including the code change
and a test for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As issue10084 has been closed "won't fix" then the same must apply here.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyt
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Other asyncore issues have been closed as "won't fix" as it's been deprecated
in favour of asyncio. I assume the same applies here.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I don't know where we stand with this as it references asyncore which is
deprecated in favour of asynio, can someone please advise.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Looks as if the status was inadvertently set to languishing. Stage needs
setting to patch review. The patch is effectively all new C code but there are
no doc changes or tests.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I understand that the patch cannot be used as the OP refuses to sign the CLA.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patches cannot be used as the OP hasn't signed the CLA.
--
components: -Distutils2
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, dstufft
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Antoine/Marc-Andre are either of you interested in taking this forward?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This shouldn't be languishing, work has been committed against revision 86742
and there's another patch that apparently just needs a little tweak.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just for the record clicking on "revision 86742" gives "Specified revision
r86742 not found".
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As a lot of work has gone into this it saddens me to see it languishing.
Surely if Python performance is to be improved the bytecode for conditionals
and loops is one of the places if not the place to do it? Are there any names
missing from the nosy list
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Was this ever a Python issue if the compiler isn't supported by ctypes? If it
is a Python issue what is the likelihood of a fix being put in place for the
2.7 series?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could we have a formal review of the patch please as Victor seemed fairly happy
with it in msg176881. Note that #16287 also refers to this issue.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
>From https://docs.python.org/3/library/distutils.html "Most Python users will
>not want to use this module directly, but instead use the cross-version tools
>maintained by the Python Packaging Authority. Refer to the Python Packaging
>Us
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Why has this been set to languishing as it's only three months old?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As issue18107 has been closed as a duplicate of this, should this be moved to
open from languishing?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The code given in msg183579 works perfectly in 3.4.1 and 3.5.0. Is there
anything to fix here whether code or docs?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone comment on this please as I know nothing about the build system or
mingw.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@David can you pick this up given your previous involvement?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've seen several comments recently about the workaround to this problem being
"don't put spaces in paths on Windows", so can we close this as "won't fix"?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
__
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
c:\cpython\PCbuild>python_d.exe -V
Python 3.5.0a0
c:\cpython\PCbuild>type C:\Users\Mark\MyPython\mytest.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# -*- coding: latin-1 -*-
import urllib.request
opener = urllib.request.build_opener()
opener.addheaders = [('User-agen
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Giampaolo can you add anything to this?
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This works perfectly for me using 3.4.1.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12066>
___
___
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +loewis, steve.dower
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +loewis, steve.dower
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python
3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can one of you on the nosy list pick this up please, it's way out of my league.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
No longer an issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Martin/Steve do you consider this enhancement request worth pursuing?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still a problem as AIX is now up to (at least) 7.1?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Does anybody want to follow up on this? #12213 was closed as fixed, #12513 is
still open.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Just one small query on the patch (more for my own benefit than anything else).
In the rst file there's now no difference between the wording for the
quotetabs positional argument to encode and the keyword argument to
encodestring. Is there a rule (of
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@bjorn terribly sorry for the delay here :-( Would you be able to supply a
patch for this, including doc and unittest changes as appropriate?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Benjamin can you take this on please?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Slipped under the radar?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Seems a reasonable idea, thoughts?
--
components: +Installation, Windows
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyth
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I believe the code in the patch has already been applied, can somebody confirm
that I'm correct please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
What is the status of this issue as according to the index PEP 3118 has been
completed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Confirmed still a problem in 3.4.1 on Win7.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch has never been applied. I'm not qualified to state whether or not it
is correct.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Anything else left to do on this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13248>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Sandro do you want to follow this up? msg142613 was on #12781.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Stefan do you want to follow this up?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This refers to a crash so can we have a code review please, I'm certainly not
qualified to do one on ceval.c.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
P
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can this be reproduced, has it been fixed already, what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This looks identical to the problem fixed on #16658.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@paul j3 can you prepare a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
"nice to have" isn't much of a requirement in my book. The Python launcher for
Windows http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0397/ is also relevant.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
ping.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12800>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As optparse has been deprecated since 3.2 in favour of argparse can this be
closed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Hopefully the patch speaks for itself.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35782/Issue13074.diff
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Petri can you propose a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13213>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is it safe to assume that this is a problem that has long been resolved?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Even I've successfully used Rietveld, so can we close this to brighten our
tracker statistics? :)
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone comment on this regex problem please, they're just not my cup of
tea.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch is small and looks clean to me. Can someone take a look with a view
to committing please, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'd be inclined to close this as "won't fix" as a workaround is given,
especially considering that mixing tabs and spaces has always been considered a
no no.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
P
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Three months gone and still no patch, not that I believe one is needed. I'm
inclined to close as "won't fix", there's nothing to stop it being reopened if
needed.
--
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@sfinnie can we please have a response to the question first asked by Antoine
and repeated by Jessica, thanks.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: -BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21327>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Will we actually get regex into the standard library on this pass?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
There are comments on rietvield but I'm not sure whether or not they've been
picked up. In any case can somebody set the appropriate fields and give us a
commit review please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is there an easy way to find out how many other issues have #2636 as a
dependency?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1528
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3647>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
How, if at all, has the requirement for HTTP 0.9 support changed since this
issue was first raised?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch is two extra lines that look fine to me, can somebody do a commit
review please?
--
components: -Distutils2
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, dstufft
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -3rd party, Python 3.2
___
Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is there anything of value in the patch which can be used, as I can't comment
on it from a technical viewpoint? Otherwise can we close this as "out of date"
or "won't fix" as appropriate?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Patched code produces identical output to unpatched code. This doesn't really
surprise me as word is reused within the for loop.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
1201 - 1300 of 3464 matches
Mail list logo