Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As XP is now out of support here are links
http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0011/#microsoft-windows
http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/ that I hope come in useful.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is the patch acceptable?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
components: -Distutils2
nosy: +dstufft
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -3rd party, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this ever likely to get applied given the arrival of asyncio?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is it worth applying the latest patch given that asynchat is deprecated in
favour of asyncio?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Would somebody review the attached patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I think msg160322 and msg160339 are saying this isn't an issue. If I'm correct
it can be closed. If I'm wrong who is best placed to provide the needed patch?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Benjamin could you review the patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As codecs.py has changed I've generated a patch file which adds the missing
parameters. I looked at test_codecs.py but could only find one reference to
the StreamReaderWriter class in WithStmtTest. I'm sorry but I'll have to leave
wr
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Senthil Kumaran/orsenthil can you pick this up as implied in msg107919?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Serhiy you don't need Windows, msg170593 refers to a Linux man page. Reading
your msg170595 I'd guess that you've got confused with a similar function that
is Windows specific.
--
___
Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Given the rise of the 64 bit machine I'd guess that this needs completing
sooner rather than later. I'd volunteer myself but I've never heard of the '#'
format codes, let alone know anything about them :-(
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm guessing that a patch to ceval.c that's this old wouldn't apply cleanly
now. I'll rework it but only if the changes are highly likely to be accepted.
Given the mixed results previously reported this is not guaranteed. Opinions
plea
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have an update on this please, I'm assuming that the priority should now
be marked as normal?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Presumably set to languishing by mistake so please close.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm assuming that this still needs some TLC.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
There is a simple patch to free memory which at a quick glance appears okay.
I've not tried to apply it as the line numbers tie up with those in the
existing code.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Seems like a good idea but it'll go nowhere without a patch, anybody up for it?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Benjamin what do you think of the proposed fix?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
If this report is (still) true I'd assume that we'd want to eventually action
it. Otherwise can we close this as out of date?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
msg139889 states "so I think this report is invalid" so I suggest we close this.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is the OP interested in taking this forward?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4887>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This won't go anywhere without a patch, is the OP willing to provide one?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Brian this will go nowhere without a patch covering code, tests and
documentation, are you interested in providing one?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
In recent months people have been doing some great work on the docs, is this
something that one of them could pick up? I'm sorry that I can't remember any
names.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python trac
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
It looks as if we're talking at cross purposes. PEP11 will not be updated any
more for Windows releases, we will be following the Microsoft support life
cycle. That is clearly of interest to anybody wishing to make code changes
against this issue. I d
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've tried to reproduce this on Windows 7 with Python 3.4.1 and failed. Would
somebody else please give it a go.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I like the wording in the patch as it's clearer than the original and so think
it should be applied.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +paul.j3
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9341>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Steve could this be included with the work you're doing with the Windows
installers?
--
components: +Windows
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, dstufft, eric.araujo, steve.dower
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.py
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1635217>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +paul.j3
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9350>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The attached patch is simple enough, surely it's a simple decision as to
whether or not to commit it?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +paul.j3
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11695>
___
___
Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
If we've got some meaningful changes can we please get them committed. However
I'd like to state that with over 4000 issues open we've got better things to do
than change docs because somebody doesn't like the use of foo, bar
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Good as 2.7 is in support until 2020.
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm assuming that this is no longer an issue as we're now at Python 2.7.7 and
Solaris 11.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Slipped under the radar?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10612>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could someone do a patch review on this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10608>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm assuming that this can go into 2.7 and 3.5 if anybody is prepared to work
on a patch.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.py
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Marc please accept our apologies for having missed this. Can you still
reproduce the problem?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could somebody please review the attached patch.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Who is best placed to look at an issue about import hooks and default
tracebacks?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can somebody answer the question about PyMem versus malloc/free functions.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The important line from the link in msg122717 is :-
mswindows = (sys.platform == "win32" or (sys.platform == "cli" and os.name ==
'nt'))
so +1 from me unless someone can show one or more problems with it.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can somebody review this small patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9499>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Slipped under the radar?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could we have a response to this please as a way to reproduce the problem is
given in the attached patch and a suggested solution is inline.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could we have a response to this problem please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Nick is this something you'd like to pick up on, and are there any other
Windows gurus who should be added to the nosy list?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The problem and fix are simple but who is best placed to take a look at this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Slipped under the radar?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we close this as "out of date" as we're already working on msi for 3.5?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyt
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can somebody review the attached patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
IIRC somebody has been working on the turtle code and/or docs recently, if I'm
correct presumably they could pick this issue up?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could we have a patch review on this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10310>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone review the patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Karl do you intend following up on this issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Karl do you intend following up on this issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10381>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a response to this please.
--
components: +Extension Modules -None
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, sbt
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9034>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a response to this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm assuming that this is classed as an enhancement request and not a bug.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, loewis
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
After three years can we close this test failure as "out of date"?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pytho
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
title: next fixer fooled by trailing cheracters -> next fixer fooled by
trailing characters
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.p
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm assuming that any work on this is unlikely as asyncore is deprecated in
favour of asyncio.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, giampaolo.rodola
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Your opinions please gentlemen.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, meador.inge
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Your opinions please folks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, meador.inge
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a patch review on this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11511>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a patch review please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11580>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have an answer to the question given in msg131355 please?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this the type of change that PEP3151 was aimed at?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1571
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I don't recall any recent reports of this problem so think this can be closed
as "out of date"?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyt
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'd intended to write a patch but got confused as msg51241 talks about
"execlp() in msvcrt" but execlp is in the os module. Please advise.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this or could this be addressed via the new pathlib module?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
See also Issue20574.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21808>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch deliberately says Windows msvcrt to distinguish it from the Python
module of the same name.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35690/Issue1576313.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Pierre can you submit a clean patch as requested in msg214267?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Terry is this something you could take on?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Marc can you prepare a patch for this issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Chris can you prepare a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Both list comprehension and generator expression are defined in the glossary
https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html, so what else can be done?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a comment on this please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Steven you're into timeit, do you have anything to add here?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steven.daprano
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
It looks as if there's nothing to be done here, is that correct?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Assuming that documentation changes are needed, who's best placed to do them?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm -0 on this as it seems to be six of one, half a dozen of the other, but I
don't get the final say :)
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can somebody check to see if this is still a problem, I've only got a Windows
PC.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracke
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Given the last two comments can this be closed as won't fix?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Patch has been applied so this can be closed.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8502>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can somebody review the attached patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
>From the statement in msg144927 this can be closed as "not a bug".
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Seems good to proceed as there are no dissenters.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've changed the nosy list according to the experts index for the os module and
Windows, sorry if I've named anyone I shouldn't have.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, loewis, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Nick/Dave, any comment on this problem?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19415>
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could somebody review the attached patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Could somebody review the simple patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone comment on this issue please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20446>
___
___
1101 - 1200 of 3464 matches
Mail list logo