Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
stage: -> patch review
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Does this still need a patch or can it be closed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2548>
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This has not been implemented as part of the new regex module, see :-
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/102181.html
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Anyone interested in this? Marc-Andre seemed +0.? on this in msg61288.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue460
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is anyone likely to work on this given msg53440 quote "Does anybody want to
write a PEP on thread cancellation? It sure looks like a hairy issue!"
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Pyth
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Confirmed still an issue in py3k by using the email subject line from msg8771
and adding two extra test cases to TestParsers got two failures. Tried several
variations of the patch from msg71573 (in the original the parantheses are
unbalanced) and pushed the
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Still a problems on py3k. Set stage to needs patch as it's so easy to
reproduce.
--
assignee: mhammond ->
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: unit test needed -> needs patch
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is anyone aware if this was implemented in 2.5 or later as hinted at in
msg61077? If yes please close this. If no any point in putting this into 3.2?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closing as nobody replied to msg71508.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close this unless there's a positive response within a couple of weeks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Guilherme I'm guessing that you're still interested in this, yes?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
is this still an issue or can it be closed as out fo date?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue592
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
assignee: -> d...@python
nosy: +d...@python
versions: +Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue616013>
___
_
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closing as no reply to msg81791.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> closed
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue626452>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Guilherme I take it that you're still interested in this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Anyone got a reply for msg107898?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue644
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
stage: -> needs patch
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue665194>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
stage: -> needs patch
type: -> feature request
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue670664>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
stage: -> needs patch
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This looks weird, a security issue with a low priority???
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue672
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This won't happen directly as mhlib has been removed from py3k, but presumably
the patch could be reworked to apply to the mailbox module where the MH class
now lives.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no response to msg81716.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no response to msg81850.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue678264>
___
___
Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as fixed in r23322.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Attached a patch for py3k where the file name has changed. Doc changes could
be based on the comment added to the error method in the patch. I don't think
a unit test is needed but could easily be persuaded otherwise.
--
keywords: +patch
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closing because of quote from msg83993 "Another feature request that I've
decided not to consider any further is recursive regular expressions. There are
other tools available for that kind of thing, and I don't want the re module to
go the
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Works fine with pythonw on 2.6 and 2.7.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can this still be reproduced on an appropriate box or can it be closed or what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue706
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is there any interest in seeing the patch updated for py3k? Any comments from
Windows users since Pexpect uses pty which is Linux only?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: -> patch review
type: -> feature request
versions: +Python 3.2 -Pyth
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Amaury I tested with Windows Vista and the latest 2.6 and 2.7 maintainance
releases, what did you use?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue706
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as suggested in msg81496.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can an AIX user state whether or not this is still an issue. The current patch
is a one liner. A patch that looks in all the known
directories was promised but never delivered.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: -> patch review
type: -> behavior
ve
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closing as no reply to msg110333.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
A small simple patch that I see no problems with.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: -> patch review
type: -> feature request
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.0, Python 3.1
___
Python t
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Does this need to be addressed or can it be closed as out of date or what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue747
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg81501.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg109729.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
There are messages both for and against the patch which contains a unit test.
Can we have a statement from a knowledgeable HTML person as to whether the
patch should be accepted or rejected.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: unit test needed -> pa
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue761888>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue816059>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg106638.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is there any interest in this issue?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
There are at least three messages stating that
os.path.supports_unicode_filenames should go so can someone please provide a
definitive statement regarding its future.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<h
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closing as no reply to msg110335.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no response to msg81870.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue783528>
___
___
Pytho
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still an issue with later versions of Python and Cygwin?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: unit test needed -> needs patch
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
&l
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close in a couple of weeks unless someone has a good reason to keep it
open.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I don't see this as particularly useful but other opinions are welcome.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as os.popen deprecated in favour of subprocess.popen.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Still an issue in 2.6, 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue798
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Patch is really simple and looks ok to me, can we get this committed please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: -> patch review
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've tried reproducing this on Windows Vista but sorry I can't make any sense
out of it. I've assumed that a unit test can be based around code given in
msg18142.
--
components: +Library (Lib) -Windows
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: ->
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can someone reply to Daniel Stutzbach's query in msg104541, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue809846>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Reopened because the history shows comments and patches months after it was set
to closed and won't fix, see msg61886.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: wont fix ->
status: closed -> open
___
Python tra
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
#1545463 has been reopened with comments about being used as a stop gap.
Possibly review and implementation of the patch here would be a better option,
sorry it's over my head.
--
versions: +Python 3.2
___
P
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
All that is needed is the doc patch to be applied and the issue closed. Or
have I missed something?
--
assignee: jackjansen -> d...@python
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, d...@python
stage: unit test needed -> patch
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've deliberately changed the stage to patch review and the version to 3.2 to
highlight the fact that a lot of work will be needed to get the new regex
engine into the standard library. Feel free to change these as is seen fit.
--
nosy: +Breamo
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
As Carbon is deprecated and the resolution is already won't fix I'll close this
in a couple of weeks unless anyone objects.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.5, Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue832159>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as bsddb has been deprecated in 2.x and removed from py3k.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg109263.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue834840>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg107343.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close in a couple of weeks unless someone states this is still a problem.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Marc-Andre as there's no comments since your last post would you like to take
this forward, cheers.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: -> patch review
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch is more trouble than it's worth because it's hopelessly out of date.
I think this needs a new patch if it's still relevant or else it should be
closed.
--
___
Python tracker
<http
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg81880.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue846817>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Anyone interested in this? I found the patch unreadable but YMMV.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue849
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
stage: needs patch -> patch review
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue850482>
___
_
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as svn blame shows this is hopelessly out of date.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This is a Sun Studio problem not a Python problem.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue822005>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I can't see this happening after 6 1/2 years, feel free to reopen if you want
to work on this.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'm just wondering if the original code could be the cause of subtle bugs with
socket.py, anyone? (I'm no sockets guru). There's a proposed inline patch
that's never been implemented, what do you (plural) make of it?.
--
nosy
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can this be closed as popen2 is deprecated?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue886
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
This is still a problem with 2.6 and 2.7. I don't know how to test this with
py3k as cPickle doesn't exist, can someone advise, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue892902>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close this in a couple of weeks as won't fix unless anyone objects.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still a problem, sorry I don't have a box to test it on?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closing as no reply to msg110827.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
assignee: tarek -> d...@python
nosy: +d...@python
stage: -> patch review
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Closed as a duplicate of #2001, but please keep in mind msg75324.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've closed #902061 as a duplicate of this, but please keep in mind msg75324
from that issue.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close this in a couple of weeks unless someone shows an interest in
running with it.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'll close this in a couple of weeks unless anyone objects.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open -> pending
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The docs for start() state "This method will raise a RuntimeException if called
more than once on the same thread object."
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
__
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I agree with Dan's comment in msg112741 about dead code so this only applies to
2.7. I'll raise a new issue to get the dead code removed from py3k.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: unit test needed ->
New submission from Mark Lawrence :
The title says it all.
--
files: imaplibpy3k.diff
keywords: patch
messages: 114331
nosy: BreamoreBoy
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: patch review
status: open
title: remove dead code from py3k imaplib
versions: Python 3.1, Python 3.2
Added
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
stage: -> patch review
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue919238>
___
___
Python-
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The patch is a one line change to a compiled regex. Would someone with html
and/or regex knowledge like to comment, thanks, as I've no idea as to the
implications. I also agree with comments in msg81692 regarding better unit
tests. Please don
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this still a problem on Solaris?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue976
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Ah I was misreading things, I too can confirm that it is still a problem.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue706
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue979407>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
nosy: +ron_adam
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue979658>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Changes by Mark Lawrence :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue984870>
___
___
Python-bug
1 - 100 of 3464 matches
Mail list logo