Jesse Noller added the comment:
Charles and Antoine's votes match my own, therefore closing the bug wont fix
--
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Antoine is correct, as he usually is. This is more of a documentation issue
than bug.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13
Jesse Noller added the comment:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Charles-François Natali wrote:
While I would tend to agree with you in theory - I don't think we should make
it the default - at least not without a LOT of lead time. There's a surprising
amount of code
Jesse Noller added the comment:
I agree derek, I think that would be a fine addition, however we lack a patch
and I don't have the current bandwidth to add it.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Yes, Charles - the test is not only welcome, but needed - it just can't rely on
reading /etc/fstab ;)
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Charles; you have +commit, it seems. I would welcome the patch and test (just
as long as the aforementioned reliance on /etc/fstab was removed).
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Jesse Noller added the comment:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> I can't seem to reproduce this under 3.3. Should it be closed?
I don't think so; it's still applicable to 2.x, and a fix shoul
Jesse Noller added the comment:
No one is currently working on a patch AFAIK
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8713>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Jesse Noller added the comment:
I agree with Antoine
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9586>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Florent - Are you running the script from Freek on the buildbots, or are you
just updating this bugs with other run failures? I'm having a really hard time
separating things.
--
___
Python tracker
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Is this intermittent, or consistently failing? Updating it with more buildbot
failures doesn't help.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Jesse Noller added the comment:
looks fine mark
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9586>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Thanks Freek - we're actually discussing some stuff like this in issue9205 as
well
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Nice.
--
nosy: +jnoller
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9663>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Jesse Noller added the comment:
> If we keep that behavior, the real problem here is that the
> result handler hangs if the process that reserved a job is gone, which is
> going to be handled
> by #9205. Should we mark it as a duplicate?
I would tend to agree with your asses
Jesse Noller added the comment:
> are there really any test/doc changes needed for this?
Yes. At bare minimum we need unit tests for the new possible usage of
the API; I'd like docs and an example which show the new usage as
well.
--
__
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Calling it stupid doesn't incentivize me to help you, or fix it.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9851>
___
___
Jesse Noller added the comment:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Michael Fladischer
wrote:
>
> Michael Fladischer added the comment:
>
> Is there any timeline on when this will be fixed? It's currently blocking
> work on a python-related package for Debian.
>
I'l
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Duplicate; 9897
--
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9851>
___
__
Jesse Noller added the comment:
hume; filing this again doesn't help. I closed issue 9851 as a duplicate of
this for you.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Jesse Noller added the comment:
I can not, for the life of me, remember why ThreadPool is there, except as a
fallback. It's also not part of the documented interface as well. Additionally,
in Python 3 we now have futures.
--
___
Python tr
Jesse Noller added the comment:
I doubt I, or Ask will have the time to rewrite the entire multiprocessing test
suite right now to work around the change Antoine.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Sridhar can you confirm if this is still a problem on 3.2?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6645>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Jesse Noller :
--
assignee: jnoller -> nobody
keywords: +easy
nosy: +nobody
priority: normal -> low
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Jesse Noller added the comment:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Well, I'm not asking anyone to rewrite the entire multiprocessing test suite;
> and, besides, I've provided a patch myself to improve it in that respect ;)
> (in issue10173)
I just
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Closing per Sridhar
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6645>
___
___
Python-bugs-lis
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Fine w/ committing this Ask.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9244>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Fine w/ committing this Ask.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7707>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Fine w/ committing this Ask as-is ask. You are correct in the original intent
of the code.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8
Jesse Noller added the comment:
I concur with RDM. We need complex data structures, and switching to JSON
represents a non zero amount of work, isn't as fast and pickle works well. If
you want to use JSON as a transport, I would do custom subcla
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Ronald - if you're OK w/ patch 2, please commit!
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11569>
___
___
Pytho
Jesse Noller added the comment:
I concur with Antoine. I think you're good to go Mark.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11675>
___
___
Jesse Noller added the comment:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> Speaking of which, I wonder why we have both multiprocessing.Pool and
> concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor. They seem to fill the exact same
Jesse Noller added the comment:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> Possible plan for POSIX, where a connection uses a pipe() or socketpair():
> exploit the fact that an endpoint becomes ready for reading (indicati
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Nothing jumps out at me at initial review; I've asked other
contributors/interested parties to take a look too. Thanks a ton Antoine for
doing this work
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Agreed; I'm not personally the windows expert that should handle that
consolidation though.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Jesse Noller added the comment:
> Note: I noticed that there are some thread-unsafe operations (the cache that
> can be modified from different threads, and thread states are modified also
> from different threads). While this isn't an issue with the current cPython
> implem
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Dupe of issue10517
--
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Do things like this in the REPL are known not to work. Things are not protected
in the if __name__ block so we can import the script properly to run it.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Can you please expand on "deeply different"?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8028>
___
___
Python-b
Jesse Noller added the comment:
We have to add the BSD header and maintain the copyright clause on all of the
multiprocessing files. Apologies for the delay
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Changes by Jesse Noller :
--
nosy: +asksol
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10527>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Jesse Noller :
--
nosy: +jnoller
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5725>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Adding, or moving, to SYSV semaphores is very low on the list of things to do.
If someone were to provide a patch, I'm sure we could consider it.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Jesse Noller added the comment:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Brian Thorne wrote:
>
> Brian Thorne added the comment:
>
> With the example script attached I see the exception every time. On Ubuntu
> 10.10 with Python 2.6
>
> Since the offending line in multiprocesing
Jesse Noller added the comment:
I'm fine with that tweak antoine
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10845>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Jesse Noller added the comment:
Yeah, despite what the RFC says, the most common usage is in web clients, and
stuffing it in the email module won't be obvious to 95% of the population I
think, unless that's where the implementation lives, but we can add a doc stub
in the http doc
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I've somehow lost my xmlrpc* changes on my local machine - if someone else
gets to it before me, feel free to work on it.
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.
New submission from Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This issue tracks the work pending for the inclusion of the pyprocessing
module under the multiprocessing name for Python 2.6 and 3.0. If needed,
additional tickets will be created for issues which will need to be
addressed after i
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Quick status:
Completed:
- Redo all documentation to match ReST format of stdlib
- thanks to Benjamin Peterson for the massive conversion he did.
- All unit tests are converted, I'm just chasing down a few lingering
bugs tha
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I applied Ben's updated patch and then applied Georg's patch - but now I
am getting an error doing "make html", unfortunately sphinx/ReST doesn't
include line numbers with the error:
mify library/miniaeframe
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Thanks Ben - even with that, for some reason I ended up with duplicate
chunks and data inside of the .rst file - wiping it all out, and then
making a blank version of the .rst and then applying the patch from Georg
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Attached is rev 1 of a complete patch for inclusion in 2.6. This patch
was developed off of trunk and includes the unit tests, docs, modules, c
module, etc.
2 of the unit tests had to be commented out, the first due to the
differe
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Added to the code review system too: http://codereview.appspot.com/2061
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Richard mentioned it should just work after being run though lib2to3
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Specifically:
>>> import multiprocessing
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "/Users/jesse/open_source/subversion/python-
trunk/Lib/multiprocessing/__init__.py", line 63, in
imp
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Additional things to clean up post-beta:
- Review all docs fully to ensure the documented API is still in sync with
the renames.
- Restore the commented out tests in test_event
- Restore the commented out test in test_bounded_sem
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Here is a diff for the tests under py3k, I applied the svnmerge, then
ben's patch and made a couple of import changes.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10587/py3k_fixed.diff
___
Pyt
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Debian PPC build crash:
http://python.org/dev/buildbot/stable/ppc%20Debian%20unstable%203.0/buil
ds/1063/step-test/0
...snip
Re-running test 'test_multiprocessing' in verbose mode
test test_multiprocessing crashed -- : [Errno 3
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Small diff for the ACKs/NEWS file
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10589/news.diff
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
New submission from Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This is on osx 10.5.3, latest gcc tool chain.
I have $ARCHFLAGS set to "-arch i386" to prevent the OS/X gcc from
building PPC code (as I don't want/need it) - if I leave this set as-is,
other applications build with
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
On python-3000 trunk, _multiprocessing doesn't even compile:
/Users/jesse/open_source/subversion/python-
3000/Modules/_multiprocessing/semaphore.c: In function ‘semlock_iszero’:
/Users/jesse/open_source/subversion/python-
3
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I did a make clean && ./configure && make and it started compiling for me
again. Sorry for the noise.
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<h
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
It's taking me longer to get to this than I planned, any help is
appreciated.
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I can get an intermittent (1 every 15 or so runs) lock in:
test_get (__main__.WithProcessesTestQueue) ...
Executed like this:
./python Lib/test/test_multiprocessing.py
When I control-c it the stack looks like this:
...snip
File &qu
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +roudkerk
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3088>
___
___
Python
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +jnoller, roudkerk
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3093>
___
_
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +jnoller, roudkerk
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3095>
___
_
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
FWIW: In order to boost the logging level within the test(s) do the
following:
Search for LOG_LEVEL, set it to:
LOG_LEVEL=util.SUBDEBUG
And then in the main() replace:
multiprocessing.get_logger().setLevel(LOG_LEVEL
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I also isolated the test(s) like Paul did, and it looks like a semi-
consistent lock up in:
File "/root/py/python-3000/Lib/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 337, in
get
racquire()
This is running only the test_event te
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +roudkerk
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3109>
___
___
Python
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> jnoller
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3109>
___
___
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +roudkerk
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3100>
___
___
Python
New submission from Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Per skip's email:
FWIW, it appears that Solaris doesn't define SEM_VALUE_MAX but does
define
_SEM_VALUE_MAX in sys/params.h.
.../Modules/_multiprocessing/multiprocessing.c: In function
'init_multiproces
New submission from Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Both debian ia64 and PPC are failing the mp test suite with the
following error:
Re-running test 'test_multiprocessing' in verbose mode
test test_multiprocessing crashed -- : [Errno
38] Function not implemented
Traceback (
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
title: multiprocessing pkg Debian compilation error -> multiprocessing ppc
Debian/ ia64 Ubuntu compilation error
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Sorry, should have been debian PPC and ubuntu ia64
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
After talking with Richard, I think the best way to attack this issue
(and the other ones around suite unreliability) is to remove the
unreliable test cases for the first beta, and then refactor the suite
post beta with an eye t
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
See: http://bugs.python.org/msg68237
For Beta 1 I am proposing a reduced test suite to remove the more
unreliable tests.
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
This is also effecting gentoo x86. After speaking with Richard, he
suggested that this could be a side-effect if the buildbot execution is
happening in a chroot'ed environment.
Barry, do you know if this is the case?
--
n
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Here is the loop I ran the tests with:
#!/bin/sh
for (( i=1;i<=100;i+=1 )); do
make test TESTOPTS="-v test_multiprocessing"
done
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Adam, is this due to the c-code tainting you pointed out earlier?
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +jnoller
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3124>
___
___
Python
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Sorry Adam, I was referencing:
http://bugs.python.org/issue3102
Also, it is possible issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue3102 is related?
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Sorry, the first link should have been:
http://bugs.python.org/issue3093
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +roudkerk
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3125>
___
___
Python
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I don't have commit rights, so I can't apply the
test_multiprocessing_reduced.diff myself. Anyone willing? I think this
should help the buildbots.
___
Python tracker <[EMAI
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I believe this is a Linux-specific problem relating to chroot jails
missing the /dev/shm filesystem.
I am suggesting we skip the test for now if /dev/shm does not exist,
via:
if (sys.platform.startswith("linux"):
if no
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I agree, fixing the chroot is the long-term solution, however this gets us
over the beta hump
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Did you add the import and fix the syntax error
On Jun 17, 2008, at 6:44 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
>
> I committed the skip
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I apologize, I should have just posted the diff
On Jun 17, 2008, at 7:00 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I switched to a more aggressive skip as it doesn't seem /dev/shm is the culprit
(at least from overnight runs). I committed it in r64375 on trunk
and I am going to wait for the build bots to run on trunk bef
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Thomas' patch applied and runs clean for me - does anyone have a problem
with me submitting it?
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> jnoller
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3125>
___
___
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> jnoller
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3088>
___
___
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> jnoller
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3110>
___
___
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Is this a make && make install?
--
nosy: +jnoller
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bu
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> jnoller
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3150>
___
___
Changes by Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> jnoller
nosy: +jnoller
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
+1 coat to the bikeshed, the new layout is painful unless you're at a
higher resolution/bigger window
--
nosy: +jnoller
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.
1 - 100 of 567 matches
Mail list logo
