Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Closing as invalid.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Thanks for the patch, committed as r61414.
--
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
This should have been fixed a long time ago. Try running "make clean;
make update; make html"?
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
type: behavior -> performance
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2303>
__
___
Pyt
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
type: feature request -> performance
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1285086>
_
__
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
type: -> performance
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue849662>
___
Python-b
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
type: -> performance
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue984219>
___
Python-b
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
type: feature request -> performance
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1492860>
_
__
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
type: feature request -> performance
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue735110>
__
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
type: resource usage -> performance
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1792>
__
___
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Closing as "Won't fix".
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Okay to close this, then?
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> georg.brandl
nosy: +georg.brandl
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2176>
__
_
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Looks good to me.
--
resolution: -> accepted
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2326>
__
_
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
versions: +Python 3.0
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1513695>
_
___
Python
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Closing in favor of #1513695.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
superseder: -> new turtle module
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2309>
__
__
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Stuff ported from 2.6 needn't be in the 3.0 NEWS, needs it?
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> vsajip
nosy: +vsajip
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2315>
__
___
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> vsajip
nosy: +vsajip
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2316>
__
___
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> vsajip
nosy: +vsajip
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2317>
__
___
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> vsajip
nosy: +vsajip
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2318>
__
___
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Closing as duplicate, then.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> help() with readline support
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&l
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
See also #2171.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2360>
__
_
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
The 2.5.1 "fix" was determined to be too backwards-incompatible and
since rolled back. The trunk behavior is "correct". Closing as rejected.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> re
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Thanks, fixed in r61617.
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: georg.brandl -> tiran
nosy: +tiran
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2421>
__
__
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Applied in r61667.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Added to the docs in r61708, r61709.
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
The docs for "io" are practically nonexistent :)
I'll leave that for a separate issue, and fixed this one by adding a
paragraph to the current file object docs (better than nothing) in r61710.
--
resolution:
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I think AMK maintains the FAQLs.
--
assignee: georg.brandl -> akuchling
nosy: +akuchling
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I don't think we should change this -- it sounds like gratuitous
breakage to me, and I also don't see the reason why httplib should throw
away an HTTP header just because the user isn't likely to need it.
--
res
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Huh, I'm not really an HTTP expert either :)
But this seems reasonable to me. Implemented this (with a slightly
different patch) in r61711.
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
_
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Fixed by adding line_num attr to DictReader in r61712, r61713 (2.5).
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Reformatted, added test case and committed in r61714.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Shouldn't we leave alone oct() and hex() (there is another issue for
deprecation warning for __oct__ and __hex__), and let people use the
versions from future_builtins?
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Added test case and warning for another use of __methods__ and committed
as r61715.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PR
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Patch for #2346 included this.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Committed a simpler patch (the file object already had a getsetlist) in
r61716.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<h
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Turning into a feature request.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
type: performance -> feature request
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pyth
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I assume that it is fixed for Christian too, so am closing it.
--
keywords: +patch
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I've added XXX comments to the code, so this is now tracked by #2322.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> Clean up getargs.c and its form
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Closing as fixed, then.
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Certainly.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Thanks, committed as r61718.
--
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Closing as Fixed.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.p
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Done in r61733.
--
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1918>
__
__
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: jhylton -> georg.brandl
nosy: +georg.brandl
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Agreed.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Thanks, committed as r61801.
--
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Fixed in r61842.
--
resolution: accepted -> fixed
status: open -> closed
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
It's not a bug in Python. Properties, being descriptors, only work fully
with new-style classes.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Applied doc patch in r61871, r61872 (3.0).
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
PEP 3000 refers to PEP 361 which has the schedule for both 2.6 and 3.0.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Added test and committed as r61878.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I'd say that since this is so easy for a fixer to spot and fix, no
convoluted effort to add a Py3k warning is necessary. (The same goes
for sys.exitfunc, #2356).
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Fixed in r61882.
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Committed patch as r61881.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> rhettinger
nosy: +rhettinger
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2478>
__
__
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> loewis
nosy: +loewis
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2481>
__
___
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
This seems to be already fixed in trunk. Can you confirm?
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
What about #1570?
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2488>
__
_
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Thanks, fixed in r61927.
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Go ahead and commit.
--
resolution: -> accepted
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I cannot reproduce this with test.py with Python 2.5.1 on x86 Linux.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Okay, closing as out of date.
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I even run modules compiled for Python 2.2 successfully on 2.5...
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
priority: high -> low
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue812750>
___
Python-b
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Added docs and committed as r61977.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Go ahead and commit -- and don't forget the issue number :)
--
assignee: georg.brandl -> benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> accepted
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http:/
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Committed patch in r61999. Thanks!
--
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
So I finally got to this one :)
I had to fix a few things, mainly error handling, and a refleak.
And I found a refleak in the compiler :)
Reviewed and committed in r62004.
--
resolution: -> accepted
status: open
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I'm in favor of this patch. Not only is "is" faster here, but it is also
way more idiomatic.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<ht
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Fixed example (a * was missing) and committed as r62007. Thanks!
--
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
The bytearray branch has been merged.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Bumping priority so that this gets reviewed before next release.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
priority: normal -> critical
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Bumping priority.
--
keywords: +26backport
priority: normal -> critical
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
#1745 already has a patch.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> duplicate
superseder: -> Backport of PEP 3102 "keyword-only arguments" to 2.6
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2327>
__
___
Python-b
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Closed #595601 as a duplicate.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> thread unsafe file objects cause crash
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bug
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Bumping priority.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
priority: normal -> critical
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1158>
__
__
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
This seems to have been committed in r61925.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
The branch has been merged in r61936.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
keywords: +26backport
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1967>
__
___
Python-bugs
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
priority: normal -> critical
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1967>
__
___
Pyt
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Backported to 2.6 in r62030 and 2.5 in r62031.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
status: open -> closed
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: georg.brandl -> gvanrossum
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2310>
__
___
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Leaving open as a reminder for coming rstdocs releases.
--
priority: normal -> high
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pyth
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
priority: -> high
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2176>
__
___
Python-b
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
status: open -> pending
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2129>
__
___
Python-b
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
assignee: -> georg.brandl
nosy: +georg.brandl
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1945>
__
_
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Benjamin, do you want to apply this? Add a Misc/NEWS item as well.
--
assignee: -> benjamin.peterson
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
New submission from Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This patch adds two things to the _ast module:
* Nodes can be initialized with keyword arguments:
m = _ast.Module(body=[...])
* Only attributes that are in _fields or _attributes can be set on nodes.
Martin, what do you
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
On second thought, restricting node attributes may prevent custom AST
processing tools from adding useful information themselves...
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I don't know if we should pollute the SVN tree with random VCS stuff.
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.
New submission from Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The ASDL file has an XXX comment about excepthandler's lineno and
col_offset -- they are not attributes but fields which gets confusing
when this is exported to Python code. I think the only way to solve this
is to make it a &q
2201 - 2300 of 5257 matches
Mail list logo