Changes by Forest Wilkinson :
--
nosy: +forest
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3831>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was just browsing the development docs, and noticed that the new
left-side navigation bar wastes a lot of horizontal space on the web
page. It fills nearly a third of my browser window (at its usual size)
with useless blank spa
New submission from Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
SSLSocket() and ssl.wrap_socket() accept private keys only as paths to
their location on the file system. This means that a server can only
support SSL if it has read access to its private key file at the time
when client conne
Changes by Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
title: ssl.wrap_socket() is incompatible with unprivileged servers, due to
keyfile requirement -> ssl.wrap_socket() is incompatible with servers that drop
privileges, due to keyfile re
Changes by Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +janssen
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3823>
___
__
Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
This problem also exists in the add-on ssl module for python < 2.6:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ssl/
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.py
Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Simon: I wish I could offer guidance here, but I'm afraid that I too am
reading some of these openssl man pages for the first time.
I agree that writing to a temporary file would be bad.
Accepting file-like objects from python
Changes by Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +forest
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2550>
___
__
New submission from Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
In python 2.6rc2, the async_chat.__init__() parameters have changed.
The first arg was called 'conn' in python 2.5, and it is now called
'sock'. This change breaks code that worked with previous python
Forest Wilkinson added the comment:
I just noticed Ezio's change to the title of this bug. Does the proposed fix
address the original bug title ("docs waste a lot of horizontal space on left
nav bar") for third-party packages that use docutils to generate their docs?
Or, doe
Changes by Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +forest
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1641>
__
___
Python-bugs
Changes by Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +forest
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2632>
__
___
Python-bugs
Changes by Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +forest
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1533164>
___
__
Changes by Forest Wilkinson :
--
nosy: +forest
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1856>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Forest Wilkinson :
--
nosy: +forest
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1720705>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Forest Wilkinson :
With use_poll=True on linux, asyncore calls handle_write() after the
socket has been closed.
More specifically, it looks like asyncore dispatches handle_read() and
handle_close() events between the writable() test and the corresponding
handle_write() call
Changes by Forest Wilkinson :
--
nosy: +forest
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2944>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Forest Wilkinson :
--
nosy: +forest
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1194378>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Forest Wilkinson added the comment:
I'm looking forward to having this functionality in asyncore. It would
help me remove some unwanted hackery from my own code.
Giampaolo, I'm concerned that your patch uses a global 'tasks' list
which cannot be overriden. Shouldn't
Forest Wilkinson added the comment:
I was just reading the PEP, and caught this bit:
"Does OrderedDict.popitem() return a particular key/value pair?
Yes. It pops-off the most recently inserted new key and its
corresponding value."
Okay, but I'd also like a convenient and fast
Forest Wilkinson added the comment:
> Shouldn't popitem() allow the caller to choose which end from
> which to pop?
Thinking it through a bit more, and LRU cache would actually need to
access the oldest item without necessarily removing it. Besides,
popitem() should probably
Forest Wilkinson added the comment:
Agreed here. Thanks, gents.
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5397>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Forest Wilkinson added the comment:
It is relative to the resolution of the user's browser window. Don't
make the mistake of assuming that everyone keeps their browser
maximized. :)
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
New submission from Forest Wilkinson:
The docs claim that email.parser.BytesFeedParser exists, but it doesn't. Looks
like email.feedparser.FeedParser is imported into the email.parser module, but
someone forgot to do the same for BytesFeedParser.
--
components: email
messages: 1
24 matches
Mail list logo