New submission from Florian Dahlitz :
Today, I tried to build Python 3.9 from source, which failed. Building it
without optimizations enabled fails due to an Segmentation fault
(output_without.txt) and building with optimizations fails with a profile-opt
error (output.txt).
$ lsb_release -a
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file48730/output_without.txt
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38877>
___
___
Python-bug
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
My commands were as follows:
$ ./configure
$ make &> output_without.txt
$ ./configure --enable-optimizations
$ make &> output.txt
Doing a make clean before each make resolved the issue. Thanks Ned!
I searched through the README.md on GitHub an
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
It would be an honor for me to work on this issue (updating the docs) as my
first CPython contribution.
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +16849
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17364
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38901>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38902>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
I'd be happy to work on this!
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38979>
___
___
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
Are you still working on this @hakancelik?
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
Are you still working on this @Manjusaka?
If not, I would like to submit a patch for it.
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
I would like to work on this issue if it is still open.
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue29
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +19552
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20272
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue29
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40670>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
I guess it would have been good if I waited submitting a PR until you replied
to my message. This way, I would have known that two separate PRs would be
better suited here - sorry for that.
Nevertheless, I read the discussions here and in PR #995 and I
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
Calling timeit from command-line with the empty string defaults to 'pass'. I
suggest to adopt this behaviour for calling timeit.timeit in the REPL as
@edison.abahurire already suggested. I would be happy to submit a
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +19560
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20286
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40691>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40701>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
I see your point and agree with you. However, IMHO the CLI and the direct
function call should behave the same way to not confuse users. The opened PR
ensures that.
--
___
Python tracker
<ht
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
I was able to reproduce the reported issue and the suggested fix worked fine.
Is there anything else missing like documentation note?
I would like to submit a PR for this @terry.reedy
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
Should we add a note that there is no preferred way of naming enum members and
provide a few examples or define some naming conventions?
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +19580
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20311
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40726>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
@docor...@sonic.net are you going to submit a PR for it or am I free to do it?
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40568>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
I added a news entry to idlelib/NEWS.txt but don't know, where to add an
additional note. The documentation of IDLE doesn't seem to be the right place.
Should a note be added to Misc/NEWS.d/next or would it be redundant, because it
is alread
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
Hi @eric.smith. I'm sure the first "to" can be removed. It sounds better this
way. Am I free to open a PR?
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.pyt
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +19585
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20316
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
Please go head @docor...@sonic.net! It's a good one to get familiar with the
process of contributing. Yes, PR stands for Pull Request.
There is the devguide (https://devguide.python.org/), which documents how to
contribute. In fact, the quick guide m
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
I pointed you to the quick guide. In fact, you fork the cpython repository,
create a new branch called fix-issue-40640, change the file
Doc/tutorial/controlflow.rst and submit a PR agains the cpython master branch.
As Rahul as already added all the
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
I'm on Ubuntu 20.04 64-bit, ran the command provided and got
Ran 303 tests in 18.900s
OK
I was running against the master branch.
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.py
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: -DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40701>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: -DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40568>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: -DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40726>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
@terry.reedy sorry if I misunderstood you, but it seems to me that you agree
with the proposed changes?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
I tested it and can confirm the findings from @cajetan.rodrigues. However, this
does not seem to be _not_ documented. The documentation clearly states that
using a positive value for radius results in a counter-clockwise direction,
whereas a negative
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40804>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40798>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Florian Dahlitz added the comment:
I would like to submit a PR for it if possible.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40798>
___
___
Python-bug
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +19732
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20483
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Florian Dahlitz :
--
nosy: +DahlitzFlorian
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40814>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
41 matches
Mail list logo