Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
pull_requests: +15147
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15453
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
pull_requests: -15147
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37797>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Thank you for the mentoring of this work.
It was great experience for me!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Can I take a look at this issue?
Is there anything should I care about except update clinic?
Thanks!
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +15176
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15489
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37805>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@vstiner
I'd like to work on this issue.
My plan is adding mime-types as 'mmp' to 'application/x-lmms-project' and
'mmpz' to 'application/x-lmms-project'
What do you think?
--
nosy: +corona10
_
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@ronaldoussoren
Do you have any ideas to resume this issue again?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
pull_requests: +15206
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15522
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
pull_requests: +15223
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15546
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@rhettinger
If you are okay, Can you review PR 15546, please?
IMHO, this issue should be fixed ASAP...
Thanks again
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
It works well on the master branch version but also the latest 3.7 branch
I think that we can close this issue for `.jpe` issue if we don't have to
support "image/jpg" case.
Python 3.9.0a0 (heads/master:daa82d019c, Aug 31 2019, 23:37:00)
[Clan
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
nosy: -vstinner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37943>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@vstinner @taleinat
This patch of this issue is not merged yet.
If there is no reason to abandon this patch,
is it okay for me to continue working on it?
--
nosy: +corona10, vstinner
___
Python tracker
<ht
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
This patch/The patch
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24416>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
pull_requests: +15301
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15633
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@p-ganssle @taleinat
I agree that there are penalties of this patch what you said.
But I'm wondering how the `fromisocalendar` API relates to this patch.
Rather, wouldn't this patch contribute to improving the usability of the
`fromisocalendar` AP
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@pganssle @serhiy.storchaka
Sounds reasonable on the view of maintaining pure Python and C APIs at the time
Thank you for the explanation.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@taleinat @p-ganssle
I am okay with closing this issue without any change.
My initial purpose for this issue was also whether or not to close a long left
issue.
I am +1 to closing this issue without any change.
Please leave a vote for this issue.
If @taleinat
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@vstinner
== baseline ==
./python.exe -m timeit -r11 -s 'import datetime' -s 'a =
datetime.datetime.now().isocalendar()'
5000 loops, best of 11: 8.73 nsec per loop
== proposed ==
./python.exe -m timeit -r11 -s
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +15318
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15651
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
versions: +Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35923>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
pull_requests: +15345
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15687
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue22
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@vstinner(my mentor) @maxking
Now this issue is solved.
I'd like to close this issue. Is it okay?
--
nosy: +maxking, vstinner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Great! I will close bpo-35939 also.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue22347>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
stage: patch review -> resolved
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue22347>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue22347>
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
This issue is fixed by
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15522
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
versions: +Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
resolution: fixed -> duplicate
superseder: -> mimetypes.guess_type("//example.com") misinterprets host name
as file name
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.py
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@vstinner
Here is the new benchmark with you suggested.
It seems to affect performance.
== Baseline ==
Mean +- std dev: 134 ns +- 2 ns
== PR 15633 ==
Mean +- std dev: 174 ns +- 5 ns
--
___
Python tracker
<ht
New submission from Dong-hee Na :
This issue is the same as bpo-22347.
Let's remove the deprecated urllib.parse._splituser and urllib.parse._splittype
from xmlrpc.client
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 351199
nosy: corona10, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
priority: normal
sev
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
versions: +Python 3.7
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38038>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +15357
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15703
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
nosy: +cheryl.sabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38038>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
title: Remove urllib.parse._ from xmlrpc.client -> Remove
urllib.parse._splittype from xmlrpc.client
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@vstinner
This issue is not solved yet.
Can I finalize this issue?
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue15
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
versions: -Python 3.7, Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@vstinner
Right. splittype() is deprecated.
Nevertheless, the same functionality is still accessible to end users with
_splittype (). So I thought we should go in the direction of removing this
completely.
>From the view of the standard library is used
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Understood
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38038>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
assignee: nnja -> corona10
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
versions: -Python 3.7, Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Good news, When this issue is solved.
Can we solve the issue from https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15633 ?
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: test needed -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
I would like to recommend this kind of question should be discussed at
comp.lang.python mailing list.
If cpython bug is detected from this issue.
Please reopen this issue.
Thanks!
--
nosy: +corona10
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
New submission from Dong-hee Na :
I've found that imghdr does not detect HEIF type yet.
I'd like to propose adding to detect HEIF type.
There's already real-life usage within HEIF
(https://help.dropbox.com/en-es/installs-integrations/mobile/ios-formats)
And also we can find
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
https://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards/mpeg-h/image-file-format
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Oh.. but PEP 594 is planning to remove imghdr.
(https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0594)
It looks like that adding a new feature is not proper.
I close this issue because of PEP 594
--
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: -> resolved
status: open -&g
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
keywords: +newcomer friendly
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38173>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
New submission from Dong-hee Na :
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/39d87b54715197ca9dcb6902bb43461c0ed701a2/Lib/tkinter/filedialog.py#L397
This should be
options["multiple"]=1 -> options["multiple"] = 1
--
components: Tkinter
messages: 352438
nosy: coro
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@ta1hia
My idea is that both tests should be added.
@p-ganssle's test aims to check the attr is allowed or not.
And your test aims to check attribute equalities of pure python module and c
module.
--
___
P
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
I think that this issue solved. Can we close this issue?
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36
New submission from Dong-hee Na :
I've found this comments.
// TODO length should be size_t! but Python doesn't support parsing size_t yet.
(https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/279f44678c8b84a183f9eeb85e0b086228154497/Modules/posixmodule.c#L8830)
I don't know when this comm
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Oh okay!
Thanks for letting me know.
Is it okay to switch it into Py_ssize_t?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Linux: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/pread.2.html
BSD: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?pread(2)
macOS:
https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/System/Conceptual/ManPages_iPhoneOS/man2/pread.2.html
All of them pass the length as
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +15940
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16359
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38243>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Looks like this issue can be solved by below code changed.
@@ -833,7 +834,7 @@ class XMLRPCDocGenerator:
def set_server_title(self, server_title):
"""Set the HTML title of the generated server documentation""&quo
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +15953
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16373
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
I've proposed the patch on GitHub which escaping the server_title when the
documenter.page is called. (It different point with msg353132.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Thank you @serhiy.storchaka and Kyle Stanley for the code review and approve.
This issue is now solved.
I close this issue.
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
_
New submission from Dong-hee Na :
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/47/builds/3578
This issue was found from GH-16359
The main issue of this failure is the lack of storage space.
OSError: [Errno 28] No space left on device: '/tmp/tmpnmcjxia9/bin/python' ->
'/t
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@vstinner
Thank you for the feedback.
I've updated the PR with the unit test you suggested :-)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@gregory.p.smith @vstinner
Looks like https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/pull/111 is merged.
Can we close this issue?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Sure!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38243>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
pull_requests: +16026
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16447
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Great idea!
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38308>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
> I prefer to keep it open until the 3.5 backport is merged.
Sorry, I didn't find it.
Yes, we should let it open until the PR is merged.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Python 3.9.0a0 (heads/bpo-31722:fc4a044a3c, Oct 4 2019, 03:10:14)
[Clang 11.0.0 (clang-1100.0.33.8)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import functools
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
@rhettinger
If you are okay, Can I process with this issue with your guide?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Oh.. Thank you for letting me know
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38308>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +16190
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16602
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38210>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
Can you finalize the PR 16241 by adding the unit test which @serhiy.storchaka
suggested?
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
pull_requests: +16247
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16664
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31722>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Dong-hee Na :
See
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/01171ebd966b0cd6352057799ad876dd1e07942e/Tools/c-analyzer/README#L37
--
keywords: newcomer friendly
messages: 354246
nosy: corona10
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: The path of check-c
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
This is newcomer friendly issue.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38419>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
keywords: +easy
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38419>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
> Hey, Can I take on this issue? :-)
Unfortunately, Amir already sent a patch for this.
Please take a look at another issue :)
Thank you
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Dong-hee Na :
Python/Python-ast.c: In function ‘PyAST_obj2mod’:
Python/Python-ast.c:10253:12: warning: ‘res’ may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810
gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-36)
--
assignee
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +16274
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16688
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
stage: patch review ->
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38425>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
New submission from Dong-hee Na :
I've got the warining like this.
Modules/gcmodule.c:1925:1: warning: ‘visit_validate’ defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
visit_validate(PyObject *op, void *parent_raw)
This looks like only used in pydebug.
I'd like to propose declaring thi
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
I'd like to suggest add unit test for the report case.
So that we can detect future regression issue :)
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
And I aplogize for my patch which makes regrssion issue.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38449>
___
___
Pytho
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
This is also reproducible on Ubuntu 18.04 gcc 7.4.0
In file included from /home/corona10/cpython/Modules/expat/expat_config.h:8:0,
from /home/corona10/cpython/Modules/expat/xmltok.c:49:
./pyconfig.h:1586:0: warning: "_POSIX_C_SOURCE"
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
> Yes, we should add a test case definitely, do you want to work on a PR?
Sure, I want to finalize this issue :)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
pull_requests: +16311
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16729
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
New submission from Dong-hee Na :
digit check logic can be replaced by Py_ISDIGIT on prepare_s.
--
assignee: corona10
messages: 354643
nosy: corona10
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: digit check logic can be replaced by Py_ISDIGIT on prepare_s
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +16347
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16787
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
versions: +Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38474>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
> What is the benefit of such change?
I think that if an API is implemented for a specific purpose,
it should be used. This will help us to maintain code quality.
Especially in the case of pointed out logics,
since Py_ISDIGIT is exactly what we want to do,
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
> I'm inclined to agree: the current code works and is efficient; there's no
> strong reason to change it.
Okay, then I will close the PR.
I respect core developer's opinions.
--
___
P
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +16373
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16821
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
nosy: +corona10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38493>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Dong-hee Na added the comment:
> What about CLD_STOPPED?
I think that it should be added also.
I 've added the CLD_STOPPED on PR 16821.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org
Change by Dong-hee Na :
--
title: os.CLD_KILLED should be implemented -> os.CLD_KILLED and os.CLD_STOPPED
should be implemented
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Dong-hee Na :
I can read some of Jython related code on the master branch.
ASFIK, this codes are the legacy of Jython2.
Currently, Jython3 stops development since 2017.
https://github.com/jython/jython3
Can we get rid of the Jython related code?
Or is there any reason to
201 - 300 of 1592 matches
Mail list logo