Dmitry Andreychuk added the comment:
I created this issue almost 4 years ago. Looking at it now, I think that I was
asking too much of that docstring. I believe it's current version quite
sufficient.
I would close the issue, but I'm not sure if it's up
New submission from Dmitry Andreychuk:
Calls to autospecced mock functions are not recorded to mock_calls list of
parent mock. This only happens if autospec is used and the original object is a
function.
Example:
import unittest.mock as mock
def foo():
pass
parent = mock.Mock
New submission from Dmitry Andreychuk:
https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/functions.html?highlight=int#int
The docstring for int() function has these sentences:
"If x is a number, return x.__int__()."
"If x is not a number or if base is given..."
Unfortunately the docstr
Dmitry Andreychuk added the comment:
Now I see that my message may look like a suggestion to add an encyclopedic
definition of number there. Sorry.
Actually I was talking about requirements for user-defined types to make them
work with int(). Something like: "If x has __int__() method r
Dmitry Andreychuk added the comment:
python 3.4.3 is also affected. Is it possible to fix this in branch 3.4?
--
nosy: +and
versions: +Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23
