David Lam added the comment:
Hi hi, noob here. I found this today after clicking 'Easy issues' link.
Would something like this work? test_mailbox.py seems to pass. However, I'm
not too sure what more needs to be done in the _explain_to. It seems like
everything to conver
David Lam added the comment:
Hm, it seems right now that the only time that happens is when creating a
message based on an mbox message. The 'status' and 'x-status' attributes are
deleted.
Any hints on what I could to do figure out what special attributes should be
dele
David Lam added the comment:
This patch deletes the leftover special attributes.
Thanks for guiding me through my confusion and/or cluelessness!
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file23191/12537.patch
___
Python tracker
<h
Changes by David Lam :
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file23192/12537.find.attribute.differences.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12537>
___
___
David Lam added the comment:
Wow, cool! Thanks for the update.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12537>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
David Lam added the comment:
haha wow, I was working on this bug too! maybe we can work on the final patch
together
I got through about 2/3's of the docs, so I thought it might help to upload
what I got so far. I basically just made stuff up so I'm totally winning to
change an
David Lam added the comment:
hi hi, found this bug after clicking the "Easy issues" link
i basically just took Ray's hint to look at the __reduce__ method, and applied
it to the __repr__ method in this patch
also updated is the test_repr() unittest
--
keywords: +pa
David Lam added the comment:
yup yup, go for it
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11176>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
David Lam added the comment:
here's a patch that covers all but one of the foo/bar/baz examples
it also has fixes for the sample code near the beginning from the review Ezio
did
the one example I didn't do was the "Arguments containing -" part. I guess it
felt like c
Changes by David Lam :
--
nosy: +dlam
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8489>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pyth
Changes by David Lam :
--
nosy: +dlam
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16954>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pyth
David Lam added the comment:
I had an innocent question about the format to use when listing function
arguments in docstrings. In the PEP 257 doc, there's a single example:
def complex(real=0.0, imag=0.0):
"""Form a complex number.
Keyword arguments:
David Lam added the comment:
Here's a patch which converts all the Doxygen comments in ElementTree.py to
docstrings!
Something I noticed was that the
from _elementtree import *
...at the bottom of ElementTree.py sort of overwrites the docstrings of the
Python module. So if yo
David Lam added the comment:
looks like RFC 6531 obsoletes 5336 -->
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6531/
(6531 says its the "Proposed Standard", whereas 5336 says its "Experimental"
etc etc)
--
___
Python tracker
David Lam added the comment:
here's an updated patch incorporating the feedback from Ezio and Eric:
- moved docstrings put in some __special__ method names
- made the description of 'tag' consistent: 'tag' means the elements name
(as opposed to 'tag
David Lam added the comment:
Hi Eli, I sure would!
(Though, if anyone finds this issue and can figure out a solution, I'd
encourage them to post it!)
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
16 matches
Mail list logo
