[issue1664] nntplib is not IPv6-capable

2008-12-29 Thread Chris Morrow
Chris Morrow added the comment: This patch doesn't appear to work for python2.5.1 -> Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Jun 15 2008, 18:24:51) [GCC 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more in

[issue1664] nntplib is not IPv6-capable

2008-12-29 Thread Chris Morrow
Chris Morrow added the comment: oh crap :( I saw the 2.6 AFTER I posted the message :( sorry. grr, have to find a fix for 2.5 I suppose now. Thanks. ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue1

[issue1664] nntplib is not IPv6-capable

2008-12-29 Thread Chris Morrow
Chris Morrow added the comment: oy, and I'm not reading emails properly. I'll try the fix you propose for 2.5. ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.

[issue1664] nntplib is not IPv6-capable

2008-12-29 Thread Chris Morrow
Chris Morrow added the comment: a possible fix for 2.5 is: morr...@tweezer:/tmp$ diff -U3 nntplib.py.orig nntplib.py --- nntplib.py.orig 2008-12-30 01:06:14.0 -0500 +++ nntplib.py 2008-12-30 01:07:33.0 -0500 @@ -109,8 +109,19 @@ """ s

[issue4777] nntplib - python 2.5

2008-12-29 Thread Chris Morrow
New submission from Chris Morrow : nntplib.py on python2.5 is not IPv6 ready. The below patch at least makes connections on both ipv4 and ipv6 to servers. This was taken out of bug: http://bugs.python.org/issue1664 if that helps... platform: Linux hostnamehere 2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686 #1 SMP

[issue1664] nntplib is not IPv6-capable

2008-12-30 Thread Chris Morrow
Chris Morrow added the comment: Are we sure that the 2.6 fix (in the patch) will make it into 2.6? (and the right upstream patching will happen to the 3.0 code as well?) ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue1

[issue1664] nntplib is not IPv6-capable

2009-04-01 Thread Chris Morrow
Chris Morrow added the comment: This is a little silly and painful... it's utterly broken to hardcode the AF type in this way, could we please apply a patch (something like the proposed seems to work fine) and get this rolled into the next release? It seems really lame to not be ab