Charlie Proctor added the comment:
Found this through the "Random Issue" button -- I've uploaded a simple test
case for thread.interrupt_main().
This is my first patch :) So let me know if there's something else I should do
and I'd love to hear any feedback...
--
Charlie Proctor added the comment:
Thanks for the feedback David!
I've posted a revised patch with more descriptive comments and the restoration
code moved into addCleanup.
As described in the comments, in the context of this test, the "main" thread is
the one running the t
Charlie Proctor added the comment:
To clarify further, the SIGALRM handler catches the timeout sent by the
ITIMER_REAL... whereas the SIGINT handler catches the interrupt_main() signals.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19
Charlie Proctor added the comment:
I broke the two cases (interrupt_main from test thread and from sub-thread)
into two separate tests, using an "expect_sigint" helper.
Let me know what you think -- thanks!
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file45354/test_interrupt_
Charlie Proctor added the comment:
I agree that the message is slightly misleading.
Uploading one possible solution. I'm sure someone more familiar with the
library might have a better approach...
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +charlie.proctor
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file
