[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Changes by Charles Cazabon : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14987/worker-lifetime-python2.6.2.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Charles Cazabon added the comment: No problem, Jesse, I realize you're busy. I've updated the patch very slightly to handle an issue I had where the worker maintainer hung once. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15940/worker-lifetime-python2

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Charles Cazabon added the comment: Thanks, Jesse -- it looks good. If there are bugs remaining in the patch, they're mine and not yours. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/i

[issue7970] email.Generator fails to flatten message parsed by email.Parser

New submission from Charles Cazabon : email.Generator fails to flatten a message parsed by email.Parser; it throws an exception with an odd (but apparently legal) message. First, the exception: File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/email/generator.py", line 84, in flatten self.

[issue30161] Using `with` statement causes dict to start papering over attribute errors

New submission from Charles Cazabon: This is a weird one. I've reproduced it with 3 versions of 2.7, including the latest 2.7.13. I didn't find an open bug about this, but I had difficulty crafting a search string for it, so I may have missed something. Basically, using a `with`

[issue30161] Using `with` statement causes dict to start papering over attribute errors

Charles Cazabon added the comment: oh ffs ;) -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30161> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

New submission from Charles Cazabon : Worker processes with multiprocessing.Pool live for the duration of the Pool. If the tasks they run happen to leak memory (from a C extension module, or from creating cycles of unreachable objects, etc) or open files or other resources, there's no eas

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Changes by Charles Cazabon : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14946/worker-lifetime-python2.6.2.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Changes by Charles Cazabon : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14947/worker-lifetime-python2.6.2.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6963> ___ ___

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Charles Cazabon added the comment: Alright, I'll add those. Thanks for looking at it; first pass was mostly to ensure it wouldn't be wasted work. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Changes by Charles Cazabon : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14947/worker-lifetime-python2.6.2.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Charles Cazabon added the comment: Updated patch attached; handles some of the Pool methods that weren't handled before. Now includes documentation and unit test additions as well. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14987/worker-lifetime-python2.6.2.

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Charles Cazabon added the comment: Jesse: this is ready for your review now. Thanks, Charles -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6963> ___ ___

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Charles Cazabon added the comment: Can someone review this patch? I believe it's sufficient for inclusion now, as it includes docs and unit tests, but if anything about it requires further attention I'd be happy to listen to change requests. We'd like get this into mainline whe

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Charles Cazabon added the comment: Okay, thanks, Jesse. Didn't realize the Con was on. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6963> ___ ___

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Charles Cazabon added the comment: Hi Jesse -- Any chance you'll be able to review this in time for it to make it into trunk for the 2.7 alpha release? Charles -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/i

[issue6963] Add worker process lifetime to multiprocessing.Pool - patch included

Charles Cazabon added the comment: Ping... two alphas into 2.7. Have you had a chance to review this functionality? Thanks. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6