New submission from Bumsik Kim :
https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-protocol.html#basesubprocesstransport
I belive the doc has a wrong name "basesubprocesstransport" and it should be
"Subprocesstransport".
You can see this in the source code:
https://github.com
Change by Bumsik Kim :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +7592
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33986>
___
___
Python-
Bumsik Kim added the comment:
As a note, BaseSubprocessTransport is used for implementation of
SubprocessTransport. BaseSubprocessTransport is not exposed outside of the
module.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
Bumsik Kim added the comment:
I also found that SubprocessTransport.close() does not reflect the changes done
in #23347.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
New submission from Bumsik Kim :
webbrowser module currently opens Opera Browser using the following command:
opera -remote "openURL(https://google.com,new-window)"
While this follows Opera's documentation
(https://www.opera.com/docs/switches/#remote), this is broken since
Change by Bumsik Kim :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +7656
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34019>
___
___
Python-
Change by Bumsik Kim :
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34019>
___
___
Bumsik Kim added the comment:
$opera --version
53.0.2907.68
$opera -remote "openURL(https://google.com,new-window)"
would open a broken link: http://openurl%28https//google.com,new-window)
I found that problem while answering a StackOverflow question:
https://stackoverflow.com
Bumsik Kim added the comment:
No problem :) To add more, the Opera's documentation
(https://www.opera.com/docs/switches) says:
"This document was last updated for Opera 11.61"
This is the reason I guessed Opera changed its CLI format to Chrome's and
f
Bumsik Kim added the comment:
I also believe this can be backported to 2.7 as well.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34019>
___
___
Python-bug
Change by Bumsik Kim :
--
pull_requests: +8651
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33649>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Bumsik Kim added the comment:
Hi, I came from #33986. I noticed that the new doc still does not reflect a
design change on SubprocessTransport.close() done in #23347. I made a PR to fix
that.
BTW this is opposed to the original PEP 3156:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3156/#subprocess
Bumsik Kim added the comment:
#33649 does not solve a problem of SubprocessTransport.close() done in #23347.
I made a PR #33649 directly to fix that.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
Change by Bumsik Kim :
--
pull_requests: +8753
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33649>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
14 matches
Mail list logo
