New submission from Ari:
The following code produces incorrect results under Python 2.7.13. One would
expect it to print 2 lines, "Encountered a start tag: a" and "Encountered a
start tag: img". Yet it prints only "Encountered a start tag: a".
from HTML
Ari added the comment:
Sorry, it was a false alarm. I had a poorly constructed testcase. I was trying
to grab all image links from html markup while simultaneously substituting
image links to somesite.com with links to anothersite.com. I had
handle_starttag and handle_startendtag defined in
Ari Consul added the comment:
Similar error on make install. Using Centos 5
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./LICENSE
/home/ac927k/local/Python-2.7/lib/python2.7/LICENSE.txt
PYTHONPATH=/home/ac927k/local/Python-2.7/lib/python2.7 \
./python -Wi -tt
/home/ac927k/local/Python-2.7
New submission from Ari Makela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The base class, ConfigParser.RawConfigParser does not inherit object and
therefore it is a classic class.
Test script run with my normal python installation:
$ /usr/bin/python -V
Python 2.5.2
$ /usr/bin/python arska/configparser.py
ba
Changes by Ari Makela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10711/configparser.diff
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Changes by Ari Makela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10711/configparser.diff
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Changes by Ari Makela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10712/configparser.py
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Ari Makela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
New-style classes make object orientated programming considerably more
convenient. For example one can use property() instead of __setitem__ et
al. There's super(). This is, of course, not a serious problem and one
can always
New submission from Ari Krupnik :
W3C DOM Level 1[1] requires removeAttributeNode() to return the removed node:
removeAttributeNode: Removes the specified attribute.
Return Value: The Attr node that was removed.
Minidom implementation returns None.
[1]https://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-DOM-Level
Change by Ari Krupnik :
--
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33274>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscrib
Ari Krupnik added the comment:
I guess the main question if whether minidom wants to adhere to the standard or
be pythonic, and it's not up to me to decide, although personally I like
standards.
The common use case for DOM functions returning the relevant nodes is for the
caller to
Change by Ari Krupnik :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +7086
stage: test needed -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Ari Krupnik :
--
pull_requests: +7087
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33274>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Ari Krupnik added the comment:
I added a test case and a News entry per serhiy.storchaka's request.
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/7465
I agree with fdrake's concerns about DOM's usefulness. DOM is not very
Pythonic. I note that as long as Python has a DOM implementat
Change by Ari Krupnik :
--
pull_requests: -7086
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33274>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Ari Krupnik :
--
pull_requests: +7088
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33274>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Ari Krupnik added the comment:
My bad. This issue looks like a simple omission to me--albeit one that's been
in the code a long time. My patch simply brings the code into compliance with
what the documentation (including in 2.7) already says it
Ari Krupnik added the comment:
I feel a little bit like I wandered into a card game whose rules I didn't
understand. I'm just a lay, mortal user. I've been writing Python for 15 years,
first time I saw an opportunity to contribute back. I saw what looked to me
like a bug tha
Ari Krupnik added the comment:
In retrospect, I wish I had submitted this as a documentation change, simply
acknowledging this function's behavior.
"In most computer projects there comes a day when it is discovered that the
machine and the manual don't agree. When the confro
Ari Koivula added the comment:
I encountered this problem on Python 3.2.5 on Windows and don't think a vague
warning about initializing modules is a proper solution. A better solution
would be to simply not add multiple handlers, even if log_to_stderr is called
more than
Ari Koivula added the comment:
Guarding the initialization is indeed correct and works, but log_to_stderr
adding the handler multiple times is still annoying. Especially as you probably
do want it to be called for child processes (at least on windows) and it might
be called during
Ari Koivula added the comment:
Actually, multiprocessing.forking.prepare does call log_to_stderr on windows.
While debugging the double handler issue I somehow came to the conclusion that
it didn't, but it seems to work just fine now. I must have been doing something
weird like creatin
22 matches
Mail list logo
