Change by Anton Barkovsky :
--
nosy: -anton.barkovsky
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue15373>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Anton Barkovsky :
--
nosy: +anton.barkovsky
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27261>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
I'm willing to try to fix this behavior.
I just want to check that this would not be considered breaking backwards
compatibility. I can imagine in theory some code relying on it, but I would say
that it would be relying on a bug. If some code is p
Change by Anton Barkovsky :
--
nosy: +anton.barkovsky
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue23794>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Anton Barkovsky :
--
nosy: +anton.barkovsky
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34961>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Do you have any evidence to believe that this is caused by a bug in CPython
itself or its stdlib? If not, it's probably an issue with your code, libraries,
or environment, and so out of scope in this tracker.
--
nosy: +anton.bark
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Here's a patch.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +anton.barkovsky
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26403/environcopy.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
A new patch with tests.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26404/environcopy_v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
--
nosy: +anton.barkovsky
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10017>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Here's a patch with fix and tests.
Note that class objects are not comparable and have the same type so they
fall back on sorting by id. Should we sort them by name as a special case
instead?
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.pytho
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
This test breaks now even in CPython. Remove it and be done with it?
--
nosy: +anton.barkovsky
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
--
nosy: +anton.barkovsky
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15433>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
The issue is still there. I hope someone fixes it before the release.
--
nosy: +anton.barkovsky
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
I think I've found the root cause.
On my system (also tested in 3.2) /dev/tty is opened successfully, but wrapping
it in io.BufferedRandom fails. By the time the exception is raised, FileIO
object is already created, and then it immediately gets de
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file26498/closewarning.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11466>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26499/closewarning.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11466>
___
___
Python-bug
New submission from Anton Barkovsky :
webbrowser._invoke opens /dev/null, never closes it and a warning is
printed.
I'm attaching a patch.
The diff looks messy, but I'm just wrapping the code in a try-finally
block, the rest is just indented.
--
components: Library (
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
The warning is printed by the file object when it closes itself in __del__:
ResourceWarning: unclosed file <_io.TextIOWrapper name='/dev/null' mode='r+'
encoding='UTF-8'>
T
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
To clarify, I discovered this when I was simply running webbrowser.open
in REPL.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Adding a patch that uses subprocess.DEVNULL instead.
Writing tests for webbrowser should be a separate issue, right?
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26513/fileclose_devnull.patch
___
Python tracker
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
--
nosy: +anton.barkovsky
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14966>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Anton Barkovsky:
webbrowser.UnixBrowser._invoke will sleep for at least 1 second after
launching browser process and then probably 4 more seconds. These numbers
are hardcoded and can't be modified which is especially problematic for
testing.
I think this code shou
New submission from Anton Barkovsky:
Exception classes from subprocess module are mentioned in the doc but do
not have their own entries.
I'm attaching patches for 3.3, 3.2 and 2.7
This issue supersedes #14966.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26599/subprocess_doc_3.2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15501>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26600/subprocess_doc_2.7.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15501>
___
___
Pytho
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
An updated patch with the same issue fixed in Konqueror class.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26602/fileclose_devnull_v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
New submission from Anton Barkovsky:
Because of the way webbrowser.UnixBrowser.open generates command-line
arguments the resulting list sometimes looks like this:
['chromium', '', 'http://www.example.org/']
This seems to work fine with chro
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file26607/webbrowser_args.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15509>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26608/webbrowser_args.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15509>
___
___
Python-bug
New submission from Anton Barkovsky:
Attaching a patch with some tests for webbrowser module.
The tests fail unless #15509 is fixed.
They also print lots of warnings unless #15447 is fixed.
--
components: Tests
files: test_webbrowser.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 167423
nosy
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Added tests in #15557.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15447>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Added tests in #15557.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15509>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26738/subprocess_doc_2.7_v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15501>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26739/subprocess_doc_3.2_v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15501>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26740/subprocess_doc_3.3_v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15501>
___
___
Pytho
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Updated.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15501>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Anton Barkovsky:
I've seen people being confused by the documentation for set.pop() method. It
makes it look like the element is selected randomly while it's
just unspecified.
I'm attaching a patch that clarifies the doc, tested on 3.3, 3.2 and 2.7
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Thanks for the review, I've updated the patch.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26774/test_webbrowser_v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Updated, added separate helper methods and 'test' and 'http://www.example.com/'
are no longer hardcoded.
> The helper methods could default to the most common string arguments so that
> you will only need to define and pass the
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
I think you forgot to write `test_open_with_autoraise_false` for Chrome tests.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Here's a patch.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +anton.barkovsky
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35932/code.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
> 1. How should python3 -q -mcode behave?
I've only now found out about sys.flags. I think we should check for -q both
before -m and after, because why not?
> 2. If we add this patch, should we also attempt to emulate other command line
> o
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Here's a patch that checks both sys.flags and sys.argv and uses argparse.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35933/code_flags_argparse.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
That's not a very likely scenario and I think the distinction between arguments
that are passed to the script and interpreter flags is fairly obvious.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Anton Barkovsky added the comment:
Yeah, my love for keyword arguments is a bit too big sometimes.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35934/code_flags_argparse_v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21
Changes by Anton Barkovsky :
--
nosy: +anton.barkovsky
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22452>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
46 matches
Mail list logo