New submission from Andrew Nissen:
Revision 53293 appears to have missed some of the logic inherent in the
previous code. There also appears to be problems with the way that the
dup2 calls are made that can result in a behavior different then
intended under a number of circumstances
Andrew Nissen added the comment:
This patch (subprocess.fix_fileno.udiff) made against subprocess.py
(Revision 55604)appears to give the desired behavior
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/
Andrew Nissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
In reference to Dustin's entry: That's the point; the expected behavior
is that subprocess should write data to the named files, without the
fix, it doesn't. With the subprocess module as it stands, there are a
number o
