Change by Abhilash Raj :
--
pull_requests: +14195
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14381
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
Change by Abhilash Raj :
--
pull_requests: +14201
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14387
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue29
New submission from Abhilash Raj :
from email.parser import BytesParser, Parser
from email.policy import default
payload = 'Content-Type:x;\x1b*="\'G\'\\"""""'
msg = Parser(policy=default).parsestr(payload)
print(msg.get('content-ty
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
Thanks for the explanation Terry!
In this case, value becomes None (I think), which causes the IndexError.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
I just wanted to report before I forgot and hence missed some details, turns
out the bug report was slightly wrong too. The testcase I provided wasn't right.
Here is the right test case to reproduce the exception with master:
# bpo_37491.py
from email.p
Change by Abhilash Raj :
--
pull_requests: +14588
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14794
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
I have proposed a PR for this: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14794
Reviews are welcome.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Change by Abhilash Raj :
--
pull_requests: +14607
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14813
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Abhilash Raj :
--
pull_requests: +14799
stage: resolved -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15044
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
This does look like a side-effect of the commit mentioned by mytran.
The issues seems to be that email._header_value_parser.get_unstructured
wrongfully assumes that anything leading with '=?' would be a valid rfc 2047
encoded word.
This is a sm
Change by Abhilash Raj :
--
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37764>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
Closing this since teh PRs are merged.
--
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
Adding security label since this can cause DOS.
--
type: -> security
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Abhilash Raj :
Looking at the docs, I couldn't find the `raise from` documentation anywhere in
the Errors and Exceptions page (https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/errors.html)
page, which seems to be the landing page for Python Exceptions.
I do see however that
Change by Abhilash Raj :
--
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
versions: +Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python
3.6
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
Yes, I am gonna work on a PR.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37826>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Abhilash Raj :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +14964
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15243
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Abhilash Raj:
After decoding percentage encoded `name` and `values` in the query string, it
tries to `_coerce_result` or encode the result to ascii (which is the value of
_implicit_encoding).
```
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/urllib/parse.py", line 691, in parse_qsl
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
Moving the conversation here from https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12732
for David.
I previously suggested HeaderParseError because of the fact that we could fail
to parse a value into a Header Object in the above scenario.
@r.david.murray Would it be
New submission from Abhilash Raj :
Since Python 3.6 the new EmailMessage API seems to be the default but
mailbox.Message still subclasses from the old email.message.Message API.
It would be nice to get EmailMessage from mailbox so that one can rely on the
new methods and content managers
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
I should also mention probably that I went ahead and made changes to make this
work and I can pass most of the tests, one is failing due to missing `\n`
character in the header's value obtained from `msg.get_all('Received')`.
I can make a
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
Can you suggest what would be the best way go about doing that?
Given that mailbox.Message subclasses from Message, I am not sure how to
proceed about this to make this configurable with a flag.
I haven't yet made a PR, but this[1] is the URL to the cha
New submission from Abhilash Raj :
According to the documentation, email.policy.SMTP and .SMTPUTF8 should have
CRLF (`\r\n`) as line endings for text/plain parts.
However, a new message parsed using message_from_binary_file with
policy.SMTPUTF8 has `\n` as line endings for text/plain parts
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
I understand that the line endings are meant for "outputs", but what
constitutes as output in this case?
I now see that `EmailMessage.as_string()` gives me `\r\n` as line endings and,
which is probably what you mean by output and `get_content()
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
Well, I myself missed the "serialization" part, so it probably was my mistake.
Maybe a :note: saying line endings are only added in serialized outputs like
the one obtained from `as_string()` or `as_bytes()` but not for other methods
that return the
New submission from Abhilash Raj :
When using `urllib.parse.urlencode` it is impossible to pass an empty list when
doseq=True.
So, I see the following behavior when using urlencode:
In [3]: urlencode({'key': ['value']}, doseq=True)
Out[3]: 'key=value'
In [4]
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
Would it then make sense to add a similar flag, keep_blank_values, in urlencode
to achieve similar behavior as parse_qas?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
Ah! But blank lists aren't.
That makes sense! Thank you!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33690>
___
___
Change by Abhilash Raj :
--
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33690>
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
I have tried to document the issue in the patch as discussed.
David: Do you think I should also add an example in walk() method
to demonstrate that it does not iterate over a 'message/rfc822' part
even though it is multipart?
--
keywords: +
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
Sorry, my bad. I was a little confused. I have updated the patch and
also added the example explicitly.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35174/email-1.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
I read the discussion on issue #21079. Does this issue still needs a patch? If
yes I am willing to write one.
--
nosy: +abhilash.raj
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
I have attached my patch. Reviews?
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35177/c_d.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
I have updated the patch. The header with mime parameter 'filename' in addition
to header value is already added, will that not be enough?
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35178/c_d-revised.patch
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
I would like to work on this issue, but I would need a little help to start
working on this feature.
--
nosy: +abhilash.raj
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue634
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
David: I had a look at the examples and documentation as you said. I found some
support for multipart/related in the form of `add_related` and `set_related`
methods. But I am still confused on how to make content_manager recognize
miltipart/related messages
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
Will the building of that 'dict' really be that difficult? Can we not walk over
all the attachments and simply map cid to name of the attachment? All
attachments have to have different names if
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
David: How does this API look?
https://gist.github.com/maxking/2f37bae7875dde027e3c
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue634
Abhilash Raj added the comment:
David: What about his API then?
https://gist.github.com/maxking/b3ed4f54674e5f480275
Here cids are generated behind the scenes when the html part is added and those
cids are assigned to the attachments on the first come basis?
Like {0} is replaced by the cid
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
