[issue35505] Test test_imaplib fail in test_imap4_host_default_value

2019-02-11 Thread Matej Cepl
Change by Matej Cepl : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +11853 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue35975] Put back the ability to parse files where async/await aren't keywords

2019-02-11 Thread Ivan Levkivskyi
Change by Ivan Levkivskyi : -- nosy: +levkivskyi ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail

[issue35918] multiprocessing's SyncManager.dict.has_key() method is broken

2019-02-11 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: New changeset a31f4cc881992e84d351957bd9ac1a92f882fa39 by Giampaolo Rodola (Rémi Lapeyre) in branch 'master': bpo-35918: Remove broken has_key method and add test (#11819) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/a31f4cc881992e84d351957bd9ac1a92f882fa39 -

[issue35918] multiprocessing's SyncManager.dict.has_key() method is broken

2019-02-11 Thread miss-islington
Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +11854 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://m

[issue35918] multiprocessing's SyncManager.dict.has_key() method is broken

2019-02-11 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: New changeset 58f05ce059cc5207320fef27a9fbc0ffdc2b1d1a by Giampaolo Rodola (Miss Islington (bot)) in branch '3.7': bpo-35918: Remove broken has_key method and add test (GH-11819) (#11824) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/58f05ce059cc5207320fef27a9f

[issue35975] Put back the ability to parse files where async/await aren't keywords

2019-02-11 Thread Ethan Smith
Change by Ethan Smith : -- nosy: +Ethan Smith ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.py

[issue35972] _xxsubinterpreters: channel_send() may truncate ints on 32-bit platforms

2019-02-11 Thread Eric Snow
Eric Snow added the comment: Is "long long" (AKA int64_t) 32 bits or 64 bits on a 32-bit platform? It it's always 32 bits then there is no problem here. Otherwise I agree we have a problem to fix. My understanding is that it is the former (always 32 bits). --

[issue35813] shared memory construct to avoid need for serialization between processes

2019-02-11 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: FWIW, I read the draft docs and found them to be at the right level throughout. I definitely wouldn't want anything more terse. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue35971] Documentation should warn about code injection from current working directory

2019-02-11 Thread Karthikeyan Singaravelan
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: The change in behavior of Perl was discussed in https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-June/045842.html -- nosy: +vstinner, xtreak ___ Python tracker ___

[issue35813] shared memory construct to avoid need for serialization between processes

2019-02-11 Thread Davin Potts
Davin Potts added the comment: @giampaolo.rodola: It definitely helps. Conceptually, SyncManager provides "distributed shared memory" where lists, dicts, etc. are held in memory by one process but may be accessed remotely from another via a Proxy Object. Mutating a dict from one process re

[issue35976] PCBuild file changes for arm32 should be separated from code changes for review

2019-02-11 Thread Paul Monson
Change by Paul Monson : -- components: Build, Windows nosy: Paul Monson, paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: PCBuild file changes for arm32 should be separated from code changes for review type: enhancement versions: Pyth

[issue35976] PCBuild file changes for arm32 should be separated from code changes for review

2019-02-11 Thread Paul Monson
Change by Paul Monson : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +11855 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-lis

[issue17561] Add socket.bind_socket() convenience function

2019-02-11 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: After iterating over this over the last few days I realized it makes more sense to implement and discuss the whole thing in here and as a single PR, so sorry about previously splitting this in a separate ticket/PR. Relevant PR is now this one and is ready

[issue35934] Add socket.bind_socket() utility function

2019-02-11 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: Closing this out as duplicate. Will continue in issue35934. -- resolution: -> duplicate stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue35973] `growable_int_array type_ignores` in parsetok.c is not always freed.

2019-02-11 Thread Karthikeyan Singaravelan
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan : -- nosy: +gvanrossum ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: htt

[issue35973] `growable_int_array type_ignores` in parsetok.c is not always freed.

2019-02-11 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum added the comment: Thanks for the report! I think I see a path through the code that doesn't free the memory. Does this patch fix it? diff --git a/Parser/parsetok.c b/Parser/parsetok.c index 1fa4a1286b..6a96f6bc5a 100644 --- a/Parser/parsetok.c +++ b/Parser/parsetok.c @@ -37

[issue21914] Create unit tests for Turtle guionly

2019-02-11 Thread Joannah Nanjekye
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment: @RAJALAKSHMI V Any status on this? I would love to take this up if you are no longer working on it. -- nosy: +nanjekyejoannah ___ Python tracker _

[issue25461] Unclear language (the word ineffective) in the documentation for os.walk

2019-02-11 Thread Joannah Nanjekye
Joannah Nanjekye added the comment: What is the status on this? From this discussion, it looks like @vstinner pushed changes to resolve this. Do we close this? If this still needs a patch, then one of the patches can be reviewed in a PR on GitHub. -- nosy: +nanjekyejoannah _

[issue21914] Create unit tests for Turtle guionly

2019-02-11 Thread RAJALAKSHMI V
RAJALAKSHMI V added the comment: I’m no longer working on this. Please feel free to take it up. Rajalakshmi.V > On 12-Feb-2019, at 11:48 AM, Joannah Nanjekye wrote: > > > Joannah Nanjekye added the comment: > > @RAJALAKSHMI V Any status on this? I would love to take this up if you are no

<    1   2