[issue21124] _struct module compilation error under Cygwin 1.7.17 on Python 3.4

Changes by Masayuki Yamamoto : -- nosy: -masamoto ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail

[issue19217] Calling assertEquals for moderately long list takes too long

Ezio Melotti added the comment: I don't think I will have time for this for a while, so if anyone wants to provide tests they are welcomed to do it. The related #11763 already has some tests, so those might be adapted for this issue. -- keywords: +easy stage: patch review -> test neede

[issue21320] dict() allows keyword expansion with integer keys, e.g. dict(**{5:'v'})

R. David Murray added the comment: I'm not going to reopen it, but my point was that if we really are going to add additional -3 warnings to help people port 2.7, as discussed at the language summit, then this would be a candidate. -- ___ Python tra

[issue21377] PyBytes_Concat could try to concat in-place

Changes by Nikolaus Rath : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35100/issue_21377_r3.diff ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue18154] make install failed on solaris

Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: Palm, I am trying "ln -sf" on Solaris 10 and it works ok. What error are you getting? -- nosy: +jcea ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue21389] The repr of BoundMethod objects sometimes incorrectly identifies the bound function

New submission from Steven Barker: The "repr" of bound method objects can be misleading in certain situations. The repr is always is of the format: > But "x" is often incorrect. Here are some examples where the current code gets it wrong: # inherited method class Base(object):

[issue20951] SSLSocket.send() returns 0 for non-blocking socket

Nikolaus Rath added the comment: Antoine, are you sure this was a problem related to this patch? The test seems to work just fine for me: $ hg update -C -r b0f6983d63df $ make clean $ ./configure --with-pydebug && make -j1 $ ./python -m test -u network,urlfetch -j 8 test_poplib [1/1] test_popli

[issue2159] dbmmodule inquiry function is performance prohibitive

Eric Olson added the comment: Hi Jesús, I believe the patch should have this behavior: a) If the database is closed, raise an exception. b) If database is empty, return False. c) If database has any entry, return True. Fast and simply checking if the database has at least a single record.

[issue6839] zipfile can't extract file

Changes by Ethan Furman : -- nosy: +ethan.furman ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.py

[issue6839] zipfile can't extract file

Adam Polkosnik added the comment: Terry, I apologize about the second change of headers, somehow I must have used the submission form to post the comment from a tab that had the old content, and the headers didn't refresh there. I assure you that it was not my intention to change them again.

[issue6839] zipfile can't extract file

Adam Polkosnik added the comment: In any event, I think that zipfile_stupid3.patch would be the best trivial fix to this issue. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue6839] zipfile can't extract file

Nick Coghlan added the comment: The check can be simplified further to "if self.debug and fname != zinfo.orig_filename:", but the conversion to a debugging print seems reasonable to me. -- nosy: +ncoghlan ___ Python tracker

[issue6839] zipfile can't extract file

Adam Polkosnik added the comment: Patch against 2.7.6 attached. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35101/zipfile_276_filename_mismatch.patch ___ Python tracker ___

[issue6839] zipfile can't extract file

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Nick, do you agree that this should be treated as a bug (apply to all 3 versions)? Should debug messages be 'print'ed, sent to stderr, or go through the warnings module? -- ___ Python tracker

[issue6839] zipfile can't extract file

Adam Polkosnik added the comment: Patch against zipfile 3.4.0 attached. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35102/zipfile_340_filename_mismatch.patch ___ Python tracker ___

[issue6839] zipfile can't extract file

Changes by Adam Polkosnik : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file35102/zipfile_340_filename_mismatch.patch ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pyth

[issue6839] zipfile can't extract file

Changes by Adam Polkosnik : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file35101/zipfile_276_filename_mismatch.patch ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pyth

[issue6839] zipfile can't extract file

Adam Polkosnik added the comment: update -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35103/zipfile_340_filename_mismatch.patch ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue6839] zipfile can't extract file

Adam Polkosnik added the comment: Once again patch against 2.7.6 -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35104/zipfile_276_filename_mismatch.patch ___ Python tracker ___ ___

<    1   2