[issue6507] Enhance dis.dis to autocompile codestrings

Nick Coghlan added the comment: Missed the window for 2.7, but should be right for 3.2. There's a minor error in the documentation (strings need to be mentioned in the list of acceptable types), but I can fix that on commit. -- assignee: benjamin.peterson -> ncoghlan priority: low ->

[issue5516] equality not symmetric for subclasses of datetime.date and datetime.datetime

Alexander Belopolsky added the comment: > Could you provide some reasoning for such a resolution? > I had thought that "won't fix" indicated that the issue > wasn't actually an error in behavior. No, that would be "invalid." IMO, "won't fix" is for bugs were cost of fixing them outweighs the

[issue8005] datetime's comparison methods do not return NotImplemented when they should

Changes by Alexander Belopolsky : -- resolution: -> out of date status: open -> pending ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list ma

[issue8820] IDLE not launching correctly

New submission from Joseph : I am on Windows 7 64 bit. Issue occurs trying to open IDLE or Module Docs. My problem is very similar to this one: http://bugs.python.org/issue8247 Also, it is almost identical to this: http://bugs.python.org/issue7265 Followed the directions in issue 7265, here is

[issue5516] equality not symmetric for subclasses of datetime.date and datetime.datetime

Nick Coghlan added the comment: I'd suggest leaving it open - the current situation is definitely suboptimal, but it is likely to take some close scrutiny to get it to behave nicely. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue8821] Range check on unicode repr

New submission from Matt Giuca : In unicodeobject.c's unicodeescape_string, in UCS2 builds, if the last character of the string is the start of a UTF-16 surrogate pair (between '\ud800' and '\udfff'), there is a slight overrun problem. For example: >>> repr(u'abcd\ud800') Upon reading ch = 0x

[issue5516] equality not symmetric for subclasses of datetime.date and datetime.datetime

Ray.Allen added the comment: Date and Datetime comparison is not defined and not documented, and until we find a nice way to implement the comparison, we should just let this comparison raise NotImpelemented. -- nosy: +ysj.ray ___ Python tracker <

[issue6715] xz compressor support

Changes by Lars Gustäbel : -- nosy: +lars.gustaebel ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.

[issue5516] equality not symmetric for subclasses of datetime.date and datetime.datetime

Nick Coghlan added the comment: Deprecating the feature for 3.x is certainly an option. May be a little drastic though. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue7150] datetime operations spanning MINYEAR give bad results

Alexander Belopolsky added the comment: I've untabified my last patch and added a NEWS entry. I believe it is ready for commit review. Mark? -- nosy: +mark.dickinson stage: patch review -> commit review Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17466/issue7150a.diff ___

[issue5689] please support lzma compression as an extension and in the tarfile module

Changes by Lars Gustäbel : -- nosy: +lars.gustaebel ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.

<    1   2