[issue3093] Namespace pollution from multiprocessing

2009-01-20 Thread Jesse Noller
Changes by Jesse Noller : -- title: Namespace polution from multiprocessing -> Namespace pollution from multiprocessing ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue4972] let's equip ftplib.FTP with __enter__ and __exit__

2009-01-20 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
Alexander Belopolsky added the comment: Please remove the old smtplib.patch: it is confusing to have two attachments with the same name. It will still be available in the history, so nothing will be lost. A nit-pick: 221 is a success code (in smtp 2xx codes are successes and 5xx are errors

[issue4242] Classify language vs. impl-detail tests, step 1

2009-01-20 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon added the comment: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 18:19, Terry J. Reedy wrote: > > Terry J. Reedy added the comment: > > Like Brett, I think the long term solution is to segregate > implementation-specific tests into a separate file or subdirectory of > files. Then the main directory of

[issue5018] Overly general claim about sequence unpacking in tutorial

2009-01-20 Thread Mitchell Model
Mitchell Model added the comment: I've read those paragraphs many times. Oddly enough when you asked me for a rewording and I went back and read them again I found a very different interpretation than all the other times. I've always thought of unpacking as being about the variables on the

[issue5020] Regex Expression Error

2009-01-20 Thread sleepyfish
New submission from sleepyfish : import re re.match(r'[/- ]','/') crash, but re.match(r'[ /-]','/'), or re.match(r'[/ -]','/'), or re.match(r'[ -/]','/') ... only when the match pattern is r'[/-]', the program crash I run it in version 2.6.1 and version 3.0, both having the same problem --

[issue5019] Specifying common controls DLL in manifest

2009-01-20 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: See issue4566. If you explicitly create "activation contexts", you might be able to have it load the right DLLs. -- nosy: +loewis ___ Python tracker __

[issue4944] os.fsync() doesn't work as expect in Windows

2009-01-20 Thread Gabriel Genellina
Gabriel Genellina added the comment: Thanks for adapting the smaller example. I think I figured out what's the problem. The error reported by checkfile.c is 0x20 = ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process." I modified the subproc

<    1   2