[issue9373] pulldom has low code coverage

2011-03-02 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: r88712 Thanks -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson resolution: -> accepted status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue9373] pulldom has low code coverage

2011-01-06 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- nosy: +flox, loewis ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.p

[issue9373] pulldom has low code coverage

2010-08-06 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Changes by Terry J. Reedy : -- stage: -> patch review type: -> feature request ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing li

[issue9373] pulldom has low code coverage

2010-08-02 Thread Mark Smith
Mark Smith added the comment: Added a patch to increase code coverage for the pulldom module to 90%. This patch also includes 3 'expectedFailure' tests that I believe indicate erroneous behaviour, associated with issues #9453 (SAX2DOM doesn't like processing instructions before the root eleme

[issue9373] pulldom has low code coverage

2010-07-24 Thread Mark Smith
New submission from Mark Smith : pulldom has poor code coverage, so I am currently implementing thorough unit tests for it. -- components: XML messages: 111476 nosy: mark.smith priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: pulldom has low code coverage versions: Python 3.2