R. David Murray added the comment:
Applied in r87590. I threw in an extra test for a multi-leapyear-range. Since
there was no reason not to, I backported it to 3.1 in r87591 and 2.7 in r87592.
In the latter two commits I also backported the issue 9342 patch.
Thanks for the patch, John, and
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I just tried John's patch, and:
- it still applies without problem (except for a bit of offset)
- I can confirm that it actually adds test coverage for leapdays() function
(bringing calendar coverage from 71% to 72%).
I think it would be good to apply it to py3k
New submission from John Chandler :
Hi,
Attaching a patch for the test_calendar.py file.
Adds four tests to provide coverage of the leapdays() function.
John
--
components: Tests
files: test_calendar.diff
keywords: patch
messages: 111373
nosy: John.Chandler
priority: normal
severity:
