[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Changes by Mark Dickinson : -- status: pending -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Mark Dickinson added the comment: Ah yes; I missed that bit of PyInit__struct; thank you! Setting to pending; I'll close once the buildbots have reported back (it might take some days for the ARM buildbots to catch up). Many thanks for the diagnosis. -- status: open -> pending

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Stefan Krah added the comment: Mark Dickinson wrote: > > Somewhere along the way native_table is used instead of lilendian_table, > > so np_bool is called. > > Hmm. This doesn't alleviate my confusion. :) I suppose I sounded a bit like the Oracle of Delphi here. :) I compiled with OPT="-O0

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Mark Dickinson added the comment: > Somewhere along the way native_table is used instead of lilendian_table, > so np_bool is called. Hmm. This doesn't alleviate my confusion. :) The relevant part of test_struct looks like: for prefix in tuple("<>!=")+('',): # other tests

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Stefan Krah added the comment: > Now I'm puzzled about why the test passes for ' open ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Changes by Mark Dickinson : -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> pending versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Mark Dickinson added the comment: Merged to release31-maint in r82942, release27-maint in r82945, release26-maint in r82946. (And added missing Misc/NEWS entries for this change in r82943, r82944.) -- ___ Python tracker

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Mark Dickinson added the comment: Thanks, Stefan! Fixed (I hope) in r82941 (py3k). Now I'm puzzled about why the test passes for ' mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker ___

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Changes by Stefan Krah : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18041/bp_bool.patch ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Stefan Krah added the comment: 'sizeof y' is obviously wrong now in the memcpy. Next attempt. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18043/bp_bool2.patch ___ Python tracker __

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Changes by Stefan Krah : -- stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Stefan Krah added the comment: The usage of char in bp_bool will not work if char is unsigned. Hopefully that is the cause. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +skrah Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18041/bp_bool.patch ___ Python tracker

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

Mark Dickinson added the comment: I don't really know where to start with this. At the point of failure, struct.pack('?', so it's a bit mystifying that one of these fails while the other passes. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue9277] test_struct failure on ARM

New submission from Mark Dickinson : test_struct currently fails on the ARM buildbots; see: http://www.python.org/dev//buildbot/builders/ARMv4%20Debian%203.x/builds/275/steps/test/logs/stdio == FAIL: test_bool (test.test_stru