[issue9115] test_site: support for systems without unsetenv

Éric Araujo added the comment: Fixed in r87691 (py3k), r87693 (3.1) and r87694 (2.7), thanks! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue9115] test_site: support for systems without unsetenv

Zsolt Cserna added the comment: I confirm that this patch fixes the problem. Thanks. On my systems I haven't seen other bugs related to unsetenv - however, it might be useful to fix subprocess.Popen and subprocess.call to use the os.environ by default (but this would be another request or dis

[issue9115] test_site: support for systems without unsetenv

Éric Araujo added the comment: Attached patch uses a copy of os.environ, like other tests already do. Can you test it? Also, is the lack of unsetenv a problem only for test_s_option? If not, we should fix the test infrastructure, not each test. -- nosy: +eric.araujo stage: -> patc

[issue9115] test_site: support for systems without unsetenv

New submission from Zsolt Cserna : On systems where there's no unsetenv function (for example solaris 8), test_site fails because the PYTHONUSERBASE environment variable remains set to "xoxo" (set in the previous tests). This results a failed test_s_option test. -- components: Tests f